Monthly Archives: May 2022

Peer Review History: Empirical Modeling and Optimization of Base Activated Ngbo Catalysts in Esterification Reaction Using Response Surface Methodology

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Djordje Cica, Associate Professor, University of Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Reviewers:

(1) Chaitanya Vijaykumar Mahamuni, Amity University, India.

(2) Ghanim M Alwan, Missouri University of S & T, USA.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Miracle Uwa Livinus, Skyline University Nigeria, Nigeria.

(2) Mohammad Bazvand, Sahand University of Technology, Iran.

(3) Narges Omrani, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

(4) Ninoska Margarita Paz Palacios, Unversidad Bolivariana De Venezuela, Venezuela.

(5) Odangowei Inetiminebi Ogidi, Federal Polytechnic Ekowe, Nigeria.

(6) S. Sankaravadivu, A.P.C. Mahalaxmi College for Women, India.

(7) Tariq Aziz, Westlake University, China.

(8) Doty Dewi Risanti, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Indonesia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Chaitanya Vijaykumar Mahamuni, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Ghanim M Alwan, USA) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Assessing the Prevalence of Intestinal Parasitic Infections (IPIs) Among the Children of Geidam Central Primary School Yobe State, Nigeria

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Zhiheng Zhou, Thyroid Cancer Research Laboratory, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Faika Ibrahim Mohamed Hassanein, Pharos University, Egypt.

(2) Dina abdalla Mohamed Zaglool, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Galo Fabián García Ordóñez, Catholic University of Cuenca, Ecuador.

(2) Luca Iasmina, Banat’s University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine “King Michael I of Romania” Romania.

(3) Nkengazong Lucia, Institute of Medical Research and Medicinal Plants studies (IMPM), Cameroon.

(4) Salwa Fouad Ahmed Oshiba, Menoufia University, Egypt.

(5) Shola Kola Babatunde, Crown-Hill University, Nigeria.

(6) Tejeshwari B V, Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, Rajarajeswari College of Nursing, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Faika Ibrahim Mohamed Hassanein, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Dina abdalla Mohamed Zaglool, Egypt) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2

Peer Review History: Reproductive Biology Analyses in Jasmine (Jasminum spp.)

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohammad Asadi, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) V. N. Kapadia, AAU, India.

(2) Serban Eugen Cucu, National Research and Development Institute for Food Bioresources – IBA, Romania.

(3) Ahmed Fathy Abd El-Khalek, Tanta University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abeer Shokeer, National Research Center, Egypt.

(2) Esther Maria Ferreira Lucas, Centro Federal de Educação Tecnológica de Minas Gerais, Brazil.

(3) Udomdeja Polyium, Rajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakhon (RMUTP), Thailand.

(4) Dominic Chukwuka Ndulue, University of Nigeria, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (V. N. Kapadia, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Serban Eugen Cucu, Romania) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Ahmed Fathy Abd El-Khalek, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Income Generation through Value Addition of Flower Crops: A Review

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fang Xiang, International Business School, University of International and Business Economics, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Dhia Ahmed Taain, University of Basrah, Iraq.

(2) Mahesh Mahadeo Kadam, CCS National Institute of Agricultural Marketing, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Dhia Ahmed Taain, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Mahesh Mahadeo Kadam, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Approximation Properties of Linear Positive Operators with Differences

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Qing-Wen Wang, Professor, Shanghai University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Nilüfer Topsakal, Sivas Cumhuriyet University, Turkey.

(2) Peter Ebiendele, Lagos State University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Haneen Jaafar Sadiq, University of Basrah, Iraq.

(2) Tahair Rasham, University of Poonch Rawalakot Azad Kashmir, Pakistan.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Nilüfer Topsakal, Turkey) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Peter Ebiendele, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: A Cross Sectional Study on Prevalence and Factors Associated with Family Planning in the Context of COVID-19 among Women of Reproductive Age in a Rural Town Council in Eastern Uganda

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ashish Anand, Associate Profressor, University of Mississipi Medical Center and Professor, William Carey School of Osteopathic Medicine, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Rivera Soto Maria Ana, UACM, Mexico.

(2) Neelam Kumari Shah, Jilin University, China.

(3) Temidayo Joseph Oluwafemi, Newgate College of Health Technology, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mohammad Othman, Fakeeh College for Medical Sciences, Saudi Arabia.

(2) Kshitij Karki, Purbanchal University, Nepal.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Rivera Soto Maria Ana, Mexico) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Neelam Kumari Shah, China) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Temidayo Joseph Oluwafemi, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: A Biological Trial on the Effect of Vitamin E and C Combination Therapy on Chronic Paraquat Toxicity

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Tunira Bhadauria, Lucknow University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Ismet Yilmaz, Inonu University, Turkiye.

(2) Maksuk, Poltekkes Kemenkes Palembang, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Endang L. Widiastuti, University of Lampung, Indonesia.

(2) Mariam Abdul -hussain Kadhem, University of  karbala, Iraq.

(3) Umar Muhammad Ghali, Near East University, Cyprus.

(4) Swapan Kumar Chatterjee, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ismet Yilmaz, Turkiye) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Maksuk, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Retroperitoneal Mucocele of the Appendix: Diagnostic Problem (A Case Report)

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ramesh Gurunathan, Malaysia.

Reviewers:

(1) Tamer Mohamed Abdulrahman, Taif University, Saudi Arabia.

(2) Vicky Sumarki Budipramana, Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abdussemee  Idowu Abdurrazzaaq, Federal Medical Centre Abeokuta, Nigeria.

(2) Vijaykumar V Ingle, Dr V M Govt Medical College, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Tamer Mohamed Abdulrahman, Saudi Arabia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Vicky Sumarki Budipramana, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA