Peer Review History: A Comprehensive Review of the Pros and Cons of Definitions of Radiation-Induced Trismus

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sevgul Donmez, Mugla Sitki Kocman University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Eduardo Martinez Martinez, Federal University of Bahia, Brazil.

(2) K. Sadasiva, Chettinad Dental College and Research Institute, India.

(3) Naveed Inayat, Avicenna Dental College, Pakistan.

(4) Nicola Marchili, Italy.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Areej Ahmed Najm, University of Baghdad, College of Dentistry, Iraq.

(2) Frederico Andrade E Silva, Campinas University, São Paulo.

(3) María Paz Fariña Vélez, Universidad de Concepción, Chile.

(4) P. L. Ravishankar, SRM University, India.

(5) Payal Arvind Kasat, India.

(6) Vishal Mehrotra, Rama Dental College, Rama University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.12/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Eduardo Martinez Martinez, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (K. Sadasiva, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Naveed Inayat, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_4 (Nicola Marchili, Italy) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Response of Onion (Allium cepa L.) to Different Sources and Levels of Sulphur on Growth, Yield and Quality

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, New York, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Girma Megersa Geleta, Salale University, Ethiopia.

(2) Kannan CS Warrier, Institute of Forest Genetics and Tree Breeding, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) P. Syam Sundar Reddy, College of Horticulture, Dr. YSR Horticultural University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Girma Megersa Geleta, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Kannan CS Warrier, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Speckle Tracking in Acute Non-St Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes Patients as a Factor of Risk Stratification

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hani Nabeel Mufti, Assistant Professor, College of Medicine-Jeddah, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Saudi Arabia and King Faisal Cardiac Center, King Abdulaziz Medical City,  Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Saudi Arabia.

Reviewers:

(1) Emre Ozdemir, Izmir Katip Celebi University, Turkey.

(2) Ali A. Hadi, University of Al-Ameed, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Emre Ozdemir, Turkey) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Ali A. Hadi, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Relationship of Mergers and Acquisitions with Financial Performance: Indian Evidence

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Olusegun Felix Ayadi, Professor, Jesse H. Jones School of Business, Texas Southern University, TX., USA.

(2) Dr. María-Dolores Guillamón, University of Murcia, Spain.

(3) Dr. Fang Xiang, International Business School, University of International and Business Economics, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Emmanuel Ikpe Michael, University of Uyo, Nigeria.

(2) Coccia Mario, National Research Council of Italy, Italy.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Emmanuel Ikpe Michael, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Coccia Mario, Italy) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Risk Factors for Breast Malignancy among Women Presenting with Breast Masses in a Teaching Hospital in Lagos, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Giuseppe Murdaca, University of Genoa, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Sudha Suresh, St. John’s Research Institute, India.

(2) Ehab Abdel Aziz Ahmed El-Shaarawy, Cairo University, Egypt.

(3) Deepak Sethi, Rabindra Nath Tagore Medical College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Sudha Suresh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Ehab Abdel Aziz Ahmed El-Shaarawy, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Deepak Sethi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of Seed Germination, Establishment and Growth of Different Adenium (Adenium arabicum) Hybrids under Prayagraj Agro-Climatic Conditions

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, New York, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Kamlesh Kumar, ICAR-Central Institute for Arid Horticulture, India.

(2) Karen Andreon Viçosi, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Brasil.

(3) Widchaya  Radchatawedchakoon, Mahasarakham University, Thailand.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ahmed Elkhawaga, Galala University, Egypt.

(2) Andrea Verónica De Fátima Oviedo, Universidad Nacional De Tucumán – Facultad De Ciencias Naturales E I.M.L, Argentina.

(3) Ujjal Kumar Pati, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Kamlesh Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Karen Andreon Viçosi, Brasil) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Widchaya Radchatawedchakoon, Thailand) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Methanolic Stem Bark Extract of Acacia nilotica (Bagaruwa) on Some Renal Function Parameters in Alloxan Induced Diabetic Albino Rats

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Nissar Sheikh, Assistant Professor, Weill Cornell Medical College, Doha, Qatar.

Reviewers:

(1) Shimaa Mubarak Fahmy Mubarak, El Warraq Central Hospital, Egypt.

(2) Sharad Vats, Banasthali Vidyapith, India.

(3) Muharni, University of Sriwijaya, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Shimaa Mubarak Fahmy Mubarak, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Sharad Vats, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Muharni, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Prevalence and Determinants of Microalbuminuria in Sickle Cell Disease Patients

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sevgul Donmez, Mugla Sitki Kocman University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Santenna Chenchula, AIIMS, India.

(2) Byron Eduardo Coello-Viñán, Ecuador.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Santenna Chenchula, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Byron Eduardo Coello-Viñán, Ecuador) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: An Evaluation of the Agrometeorological Heat Indices for Different Dates of Sowing and Varieties of Chickpeas

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Wen-Cheng Liu, Professor, National United University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Akhilesh Sah, Birsa Agricultural University, India.

(2) R. Nambu Mahalakshmi, Velumanoharan Arts and Science College for Women, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Gopal Lal Choudhary, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Akhilesh Sah, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (R. Nambu Mahalakshmi, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Simulation of the Water Demand in 2050 in the Lobo Watershed in Nibéhibé (Central-Western Cote d’Ivoire): Application of the WEAP Model

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Kholil, Senior Lecturer, Sahid University Jakarta, Indonesia.

Reviewers:

(1) Gusikit, R.B, University of Jos, Nigeria.

(2) Ghadir Ay El-Chaghaby, Agricultural Research Center, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Sanjib Kumar Datta, University of Kalyani, India.

(2) Nedim Özdemir, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Turkey.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Gusikit, R.B, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Ghadir Ay El-Chaghaby, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA