Peer Review History: A Study of Physical Fitness Index in Physiotherapy Students by Using Modified Harvard Step Test

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Weimin Gao, Center for Personalized Diagnostics, Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.

(2) Dr. Rachid Masrour, Professor, Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University, Morocco.

(3) Dr. Fagbadebo Omololu Michael, Durban University of Technology, South Africa.

Reviewers:

(1) Keren-Happuch Twumasiwaa Boateng, University for Development Studies, Ghana.

(2) Kimura Takashi, Aso Rehabilitation College, Japan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Diana Andreia Tavares Pinto, Portugal.

(2) Mehdi   Rostamizadeh, Islamic Azad University of Ahar Branch, Iran.

(3) Deepak Sethi, Rabindra Nath Tagore Medical College, India.

(4) Sumit Raghav, Swami Vivekanand Subharti University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Keren-Happuch Twumasiwaa Boateng, Ghana) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Kimura Takashi, Japan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Comparison of the Effect on Postoperative Pain between Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve Block and Local Infiltration Anesthesia after Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized Trial

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Murali P Vettath, Director-International Center of Excellence in OPCAB surgery, MEITRA Hospital, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Katayoun Haryalchi, Guilan University of Medical Science, Iran.

(2) Joe Liu, MSU, USA.

(3) Atiyeh Rezaei, Shahid Beheshi University of Medical Science, Iran.

(4) Ibrahim Fadl Mahmoud, Al-Azher University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Kenechukwu Enwonwu, University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Katayoun Haryalchi, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Joe Liu, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Atiyeh Rezaei, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_4 (Ibrahim Fadl Mahmoud, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Efficient Elliptic Curve Arithmetic for Lightweight Cryptographic Schemes for IoT Applications

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Francisco Welington de Sousa Lima, Universidade Federal do Piauí, Teresina, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Shadab Siddiqui, Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation, India.

(2) Gabriel Gomes De Oliveira, UNICAMP, Brazil.

(3) Shahab Wahhab Kareem, Erbil Polytechnic University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) D. Hemanand, S.A. Engineering College, India.

(2) Hamzah M. Marhoon, Al-Esraa University College, Republic of Iraq.

(3) Mudasir M. Kirmani, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences & Technology, India.

(4) P. Asha, Sathyabama Institute of Science and Technology, India.

(5) R Palson Kennedy, India.

(6) Sabyasachi Samanta, Haldia Institute of Technology, India.

(7) Shrinivas Kishanrao Sonkar, India.

(8) Vikram Singh, Chaudhary Devi Lal University, India.

(9) Vuna Venkata Vidyasagar, Gitam School of Technology, Gitam Eemed Tobe Univeersity, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Shadab Siddiqui, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Gabriel Gomes De Oliveira, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Shahab Wahhab Kareem, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Genetic Diversity Study of Melon Native Landraces Using ISSR Markers in Kurdistan Region of Iraq

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Daniele De Wrachien, Retired Professor, State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Carmine Boniello, University of Salerno, Italy.

(2) R. K. Lal, CSIR-CIMAP, India.

(3) Víctor Manuel de Jesús Canché Ek, México.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Cosmas S. Abengmeneng, University for Development Studies, Ghana.

(2) Hayyawi Wewa Attia Al-Juthery, Unervetsity of Al-Qadisiyah, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Carmine Boniello, Italy) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (R. K. Lal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Víctor Manuel de Jesús Canché Ek, México) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Studying on Crop Response Model for Grapes under Climate Change Scenario: Statistical Study Approach

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Wen-Cheng Liu, Professor, National United University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Xinxing Wu, University of Kentucky, United States.

(2) Tiruveedula Gopi Krishna, Adama Science and Technology University, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) M Krishnamurthy, KCG College of Technology, India.

(2) Alireza Allameh, Rice Research Institute of Iran, Iran.

(3) Omar Sedqi Kareem, Duhok Polytechnic University, Iraq.

(4) Sylvanus Iro, Imo State University, Nigeria.

(5) Anang Susanto, Merdeka University, Indonesia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Xinxing Wu, United States) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Tiruveedula Gopi Krishna, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Copper Oxide Nanoparticles Induced Liver and Kidney Toxicity in Rat

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ardhendu Kumar Mandal, Principal Technical Officer, Indian Institute of Chemical Biology, C.S.I.R.; India.

(2) Dr. Arulselvan Palanisamy, Visiting Professor, School of Bio-Engineering, Centre for Materials Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, Bharath Institute of Higher Education and Research, India.

(3) Dr. S. Prabhu, Former Professor, Sri Venkateswara College of Engineering, Sriperumbudur, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Rekha S, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Dayananda Sagar University, India.

(2) P. Manikantan, CHRIST University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anthony Kodzo-Grey Venyo, North Manchester General Hospital, United Kingdom.

(2) Omar Hussein Ahmed, Tikrit University  College of Pharmacy, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Rekha S, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (P. Manikantan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v3_and_Feedback_v3 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Broad Bean and Carob Flours, Alternative Ingredients to Amplify Sensory Notes

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Tapanee Hongratanaworakit, Associate Professor, Srinakharinwirot University, Thailand.

Reviewers:

(1) Celile Aylin Oluk, Eastern Mediterranean Agriculture Research Institute, Türkiye.

(2) Pushpa Acharya, Canada.

(3) Sebaey Mahgoub, Children’s Cancer Hospital, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aderibigbe Foluso, Glasgow Caledonian University, Scotland.

(2) Hossein Habibi, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

(3) Judit Tarek-Tilistyák, University of Nyíregyháza, Hungary.

(4) Marisa Guerra Modernell, Simon Bolivar University, Venezuela.

(5) Mohamed Moustafa Abd El-Rzik, Agriculture College, Ain Shams University, Egypt.

(6) Nazira Sarkis, University of Aleppo, Syria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Celile Aylin Oluk, Türkiye) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Pushpa Acharya, Canada) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Sebaey Mahgoub, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Rapid Methods of Synthesis of Stilbene and Phenylethynylstilbene Arms

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fahmida Khan, National Institute of Technology, Raipur, India.

Reviewers:

(1) V. Krishna, Malla Reddy Engineering College, India.

(2) A. V. G. S. Prasad, JNTU, India.

(3) Manohar V Lokhande, Sathaye College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ammar A. Razzak Mahmood, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (V. Krishna, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (A. V. G. S. Prasad, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Manohar V Lokhande, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Study of Treating Wastewater with a Laboratory Benchtop Septic Systems

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hamdy  Mohy El-Din Afefy, Professor, Tanta University, Smouha, Alexandria, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Akarsh Verma, University of Petroleum and Energy Studies, India.

(2) Tariq Aziz, School of Engineering, Westlake University, China.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Akarsh Verma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Tariq Aziz, China) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Phenomenon of the ‘Starry Sky’ on Blood: Lesson Learned From Severe Malaria Falciparum

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dharmesh Chandra Sharma, Madhur Pathology, M K Plasa, Katora Tal Chauraha, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Hüsniye Kayalar, Ege University, Turkey.

(2) Deijanria Albuquerque, Federal University of Mato Grosso, Brazil.

(3) R. Rahmawati, University of Mataram, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Agustin Joison, Cordoba Catholic University, Argentina.

(2) Dharmasoth Rama Devi, Dr. Samuel George Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, India.

(3) Edy Victor Haryanto S, Universitas Potensi Utama, Indonesia.

(4) Nadia Noreen, Pakistan.

(5) Neera Kapoor, IGNOU, India.

(6) Rama Shankar, Patanjali Research Institute, India.

(7) Sk Chand Basha, India.

(8) Yanitsa Davidkova, Specialised Hospital for Active Treatment of Hematological Diseases, Bulgaria.

(9) Atul Choube, Awadh University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Hüsniye Kayalar, Turkey) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Deijanria Albuquerque, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (R. Rahmawati, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA