Peer Review History: Correlation and Path Analysis for Growth, Yield, Quality and Incidence of Shoot and Fruit Borer in Brinjal (Solanum melongena L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Afroz Alam, Associate Professor, Banasthali University (accredited A grade by NAAC), P.O. Banasthali Vidyapith, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Salwa Abdel Azizi Ezzat, Agriculture Research Center, Egypt.

(2) Vikas Tandon, CSK, HPKV, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Amandeep Kaur, Punjab Agricultural University, India.

(2) S. Vallal Kannan, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.85/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Salwa Abdel Azizi Ezzat, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Vikas Tandon, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Nutrients Management Management Practices on Growth and Yield Parameters of Gobhi Sarson (Brassica napus spp. napus).

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Yalçın Coşkun, Associate Professor, Lapseki Vocational College, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Kou Hayakawa, National Research Institute for Child Health and Development, Japan.

(2) Wayan Wangiyana, University of Mataram, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abdel-Monnem Sadalaha Kahlel, Northern Technical University, Iraq.

(2) Juan Diego García Paredes, Universidad Autónoma de Nayarit, México.

(3) Prabowo Tjitropranoto, IPB University, Indonesia.

(4) Sandeep Bhardwaj, CCS Haryana Agriculture University, India.

(5) A. Senthilkumar, The Indian Agriculture College, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Kou Hayakawa, Japan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Wayan Wangiyana, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: In-silico Investigation of Potential Inhibitors of 11-β-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. S. Prabhu, Former Professor, Sri Venkateswara College of Engineering, Sriperumbudur, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Oshin Verma, Gujarat University, India.

(2) Sukhrajkaur, Government Medical College, India.

(3) Eduardo Burgarelli Lages, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Shaik Sarfaraz Nawaz, King Saud University, Saudi Arabia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) G. Swathi, Government Degree and PG College, India.

(2) Kirti Bhati, Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed to be University, College of Ayurved, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Oshin Verma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Sukhrajkaur, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Eduardo Burgarelli Lages, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of Edaphic Parameters on the Natural Regeneration of Terminalia chebula Retz. across Garhwal Himalaya

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Levent SON levent, School of Silifke, The University of Mersin, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Anélia Marais, South Africa.

(2) Chadetrik Rout, Maharishi Markandeshwar Deemed to be University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Anélia Marais, South Africa) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Chadetrik Rout, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Foliar Application of Nutrient and Hormonal Consortia Boost-up the Growth Parameters in Greengram Plants

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Afroz Alam, Associate Professor, Banasthali University (accredited A grade by NAAC), P.O. Banasthali Vidyapith- 304 022 (Rajasthan), India.

Reviewers:

(1) Afam-Ezeaku Chikaodili Eziamaka, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Nigeria.

(2) Ruchuon Wanna, Mahasarakham University, Thailand.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Hind Bushra Ahmed, Ahfad University for Women (AUW), Sudan.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Afam-Ezeaku Chikaodili Eziamaka, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Ruchuon Wanna, Thailand) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Soil Texture Prediction Using Machine Learning Approach for Sustainable Soil Health Management

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ahmed Medhat Mohamed Al-Naggar, Professor, Cairo University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Manu Mitra, University of Bridgeport, USA.

(2) Ankit Dinesh Patel, Sarvajanik College of Engineering and Technology, Sarvajanik University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Hamzah M. Marhoon, Al-Nahrain University, College of Information Engineering, Republic of Iraq.

(2) Makkies David Lengwati, South Africa.

(3) Mihaela Toderas, University of Petrosani, Romania.

(4) Raymond Ikechukwu Onuoha, Michael Okpara University of Agricultureumudike, Nigeria.

(5) Thangadurai N, RajaRajeswari College of Engineering, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Krishna Patel, Charotar University of Science And Technology, India.

(2) M. Murali, Medi-Caps University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Manu Mitra, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Ankit Dinesh Patel, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Beneficial Fungal Root Endophyte Piriformospora indica Diminishes Yield Loss Without Compromising Quality of Banana Fruits Due to Banana bract mosaic virus Infection through Better Soil Nutrient Mobilization

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Chen Chin Chang, Adjunct Professor, Hebei Normal University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Ferry Fadzlul Rahman, Universitas Muhammadiyah Kalimantan Timur, Indonesia.

(2) Ahthasham Sajid, Capital University of Science and Technology, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mohammed Rasheed, University of Technology, Iraq.

(2) Onwudebelu  Ugochukwu, Alex Ekwueme Federal University Ndufu Alike Ikwo (AE-FUNAI), Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ferry Fadzlul Rahman, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Ahthasham Sajid, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Physiological Role of Nutrient Consortium for Improving the Yield in Cotton

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Chen Chin Chang, Adjunct Professor, Hebei Normal University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Namita Joshi, Gurukula Kangri Deemed to be University, India.

(2) Monika Ray, Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Namita Joshi, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Monika Ray, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Research on Bridge Damage Identification Method Based on Dynamic Characteristics

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Huan-Liang Tsai, School of Engineering, Da-Yeh University, Taiwan, R.O.C.

Reviewers:

(1) Mihaela Toderas, University of Petrosani, Romania.

(2) Qasim M. Shakir, University of Kufa, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) C. K. Gomathy, Sri Chandrasekharendra Saraswathi Viswa Mahavidyalaya (SCSVMV Deemed to be University) Kanchipuram, India.

(2) Kadhim K. Resan, Mustansiriyah University, Iraq.

(3) Shivendra Nandan, Indian Institute of Technology Jodhpur, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Mihaela Toderas, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Qasim M. Shakir, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Quality Assessment of Sokoto Water Distribution Networks

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Elangovan, B. S. Abdur Rahman Crescent Institute of Science & Technology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Buddhi Raj Joshi, School of Engineering, Pokhara University, Nepal.

(2) Akarsh Verma, University of Petroleum and Energy Studies, India.

(3) Joseph Kpop Moses, Kaduna State University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Sparsha Narendula, VNR Vignana Jyothi Institute of Engineering and Technology, India.

(2) Pankaj Balasaheb Gavali, Sanjay Ghodawat University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Dinku Worku Debele, Madda Walabu University, Ethiopia.

(2) Ali Fadhil Naser, Al-Furat Al-Awsat Technical Univ, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Buddhi Raj Joshi, Nepal) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Akarsh Verma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Joseph Kpop Moses, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA