Peer Review History: Screening of Different Genotypes of Niger (Guizotia abyssinica Cass) against Major Insect Pests

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Marco Trevisan, Professor, Institute of Agricultural Chemistry and Environmental Research Centre Biomass, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Magdalene Kharbangar, Synod College, India.

(2) M. V. Dabhi, Anand Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Deressa Tesfaye Gutu, Ethiopian Institute Agricultural Research Center, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Magdalene Kharbangar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (M. V. Dabhi, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Consumer Price Search Behaviors in Online Shopping

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Chun-Chien Kuo, Associate Professor, National Taipei University of Business, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Milad Farzin, Rahedanesh Institute of Higher Education, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

(2) Albina Amin, Bangladesh University of Professionals, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Christina Esti Susanti, Widya Mandala Surabaya Catholic University, Indonesia.

(2) Mahmoud Alghizzawi, Amman Arab University, Jordan

(3) Oyerinde Oluyinka Moses, Nigeria.

(4) Umbas Krisnanto, Perbanas Institute, Indonesia.

(5) Yingji Li, Yunnan University of Chinese Medicine, China.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Dickson Mdhlalose, National Electronic Media Institute of South Africa, South Africa.

(2) L. Sankari, Sri Ramakrishna College of Arts & Science for Women, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Milad Farzin, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Albina Amin, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Genetic Variability, Heritability and Genetic Advance of Rice Genotypes (Oryza sativa L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Marco Trevisan, Professor, Institute of Agricultural Chemistry and Environmental Research Centre Biomass, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) A. Thanga Hemavathy, Anbil Dharmalingam Agricultural College, TNAU, India.

(2) Mahfut, Lampung University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Nandkangre Hervé, Centre Universitaire de Tenkodogo, Burkina Faso.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (A. Thanga Hemavathy, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Mahfut, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Standardization of Rose Flower Propagation by Improving the Climatic Conditions in India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Valarmathi, Scientist, ICAR- Central Institute for Cotton Research, Coimbatore, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Mohamed Mohamed El-Komi, National Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries, Egypt.

(2) Salisu Audu Baba, School of Undergraduate, College of Education, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Prashanth Sangannavar, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Mohamed Mohamed El-Komi, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Salisu Audu Baba, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Study of Salinity in Market Garden Production on the Togolese Coast

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Chen Chin Chang, Adjunct Professor, Hebei Normal University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Josep Vicent Llinares Palacios, Universitat Politècnica de València, Spain.

(2) Indah Suciati, Alkhairaat University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Tariq H. Y. Al-Maliky, MSC. University, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Josep Vicent Llinares Palacios, Spain) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Indah Suciati, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Economic Dimensions of Mustard Cultivation under Sprinkler Irrigation in Southern Haryana

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hakan Sevik, Kastamonu University, Turkey.

(2) Dr. P. Valarmathi, Scientist, ICAR- Central Institute for Cotton Research, Coimbatore, India.

(3) Dr. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, New York, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Jeverson Santiago Quishpe Gaibor, Salesian Polytechnic University, Ecuador.

(2) Visagaperumal, T. John College of Pharmacy, Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Raghunath Chandranauth, National Agricultural Research and Extension Institute (NAREI), Guyana.

(2) L. Geetarani Devi, College of Agriculture, Central Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Usha Chirala, Andhra University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Jeverson Santiago Quishpe Gaibor, Ecuador) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Visagaperumal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comprehensive Analysis of the Livelihood Index among Millet Farmers Associated with Farmers Producer Organizations (FPOs) in Madurai District of Tamil Nadu

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rajesh Kumar, Assistant Professor, College of Veterinary Sciences, Lala Lajpat Rai University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences (LUVAS), India.

Reviewers:

(1) Pradeep Kumar Panda, Gopabandhu Academy of Administration, India.

(2) Chairil Anwar Siregar, Research Center for Ecology and Ethnobiology, National Institute of Research and Innovation, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bello Olunike Adedoyin, Osun State College of Education, Nigeria.

(2) Carlo Artemi, Italy.

(3) Hnaifah Binti Jambari, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Malaysia.

(4) Sanjib Kumar Datta, University of Kalyani, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) G. S. Solanki, Mizoram University, India.

(2) Sajad A. Saraf, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Pradeep Kumar Panda, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Chairil Anwar Siregar, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Study on Promotional Strategy of Syngenta Product Amistar in Hoshiarpur District of Punjab, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Roxana Plesa, Senior Lecturer, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Raj Kumar Yogi, India.

(2) Moataz Eliw, Al-Azhar University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Habiba Usman Aliyu, Federal University of Kashere, Nigeria.

(2) Udokang Anietie Edem, The Federal Polytechnic Offa, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Hussein Ali Salim, Iraq.

(2) Sandeep Bhardwaj, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, India.

(3) Sarhan Ahmed Soliman, Egypt.

(4) Timothy A. Okeowo, Lagos State University of Science and Technology, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Raj Kumar Yogi, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Moataz Eliw, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Marketing Efficiency of Cocoon in Salem District of Tamil Nadu, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Shakeel-Ul-Rehman, Assistant Professor, Islamic University of Science and Technology, India.

(2) Dr. Mevlut Gul, Associate Professor, Isparta Applied Science University, Turkey.

(3) Dr. Roxana Plesa, Senior Lecturer, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Lavjit Kaur, Punjab Agricultural University, India.

(2) Mohammad Reza Zargaran Khouzani, Khuzestan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bharti, ICAR-IASRI, India.

(2) C. Tholkappian, Government Arts and Science College Mettur Dam Tamil Nadu, India.

(3) Khaled Abdel-Moneim Hammam, Horticulture Research Institute, Agriculture Research Center (ARC), Egypt.

(4) L.M.A.Shamila, Eastern University, Sri Lanka.

(5) Olha Shapoval, Kharkiv National Medical University, Ukraine.

(6) R. Mahalakshmi, India.

(7) Sajad A. Saraf, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir (SKUAST-K), India.

(8) Shahram Gilaninia, IAURASHT.AC.IR, Iran.

(9) T. Amose, The American College, Madurai Kamaraj University, India.

(10) Wardis Girsang, Pattimura University, Indonesia.

(11) Yudha Trinoegraha Adiputra, University of Lampung, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Yan Yunxian, Jilin Agricultural University, China.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Lavjit Kaur, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Mohammad Reza Zargaran Khouzani, Iran) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Resource Use Efficiency and Constraints in the Production of Direct Seeded Rice in Haryana, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fang Xiang, International Business School, University of International and Business Economics, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Anjali Tomar, RVSKVV, India.

(2) Aparna Jaiswal, College of Agriculture, JNKVV, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Anjali Tomar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Aparna Jaiswal, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA