Peer Review History: Proposed Model for Washback Effect of High-stakes Test in Ghanaian Senior High Schools

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Sofia Pedrosa Gomes dos Santos, Assistant Professor, UIDEF – Instituto da Educação, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Mg Vivian Minnaard, UFASTA, Argentina.

(2) Ana Claudia Tenor, UNIBR, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Hadiyanto, Universitas Jambi, Indonesia.

(2) Minati Rani Mohapatra, India.

(3) Sharon Campbell-Phillips, Atlantic International University, Trinidad and Tobago.

(4) You Huay Woon, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Mg Vivian Minnaard, Argentina) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Ana Claudia Tenor, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Editorial Comment | File 1 | Na


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Zero Tillage Lead to Enhanced Productivity and Soil Health

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Muhammad Shehzad, Associate Professor, The University of Poonch Rawalakot AJK, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Manuel Emilio Milla Pino, National University of Jaen, Peru.

(2) Barbara Wieliczko, Institute for Rural and Agricultural Development, Polish Academy of Sciences, Poland.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Giovanni Guimarães Landa, Centro Universitário Vale do Cricaré (UNIVC), Brazil.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Abubaker Ahmed Mohamed Ahmed Elayis, University of Bahri, Sudan.

(2) George Omoto, Kenya.

(3) Nibal Khaleel Mousa, Iraq.

(4) Pradip K Bora, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Manuel Emilio Milla Pino, Peru) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Barbara Wieliczko, Poland) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Morphological and Physiological Analysis of VRI-3 Cashew Plantations under Different Planting Density Systems

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Daniele De Wrachien, State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:.

(1) Junir Antônio Lutinski, Brazil.

(2) Josep Vicent Llinares Palacios, Universitat Politecnica de Valencia, Spain.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Junir Antônio Lutinski, Brazil) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Josep Vicent Llinares Palacios, Spain) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Root Morphological Characteristics of Five Rice Genotypes with Different Nitrogen Use Efficiency

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Daniele De Wrachien, State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Ramin Samiei Fard, The Pennsylvania State University, USA.

(2) Kannan CS Warrier, ICFRE-Institute of Forest Genetics and Tree Breeding, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Asma Jabeen, Indian Institute of Rice Research, Osmania University, India.

(2) Mahdi Ghiyasi, Urmia University, Iran.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Felix Mereka Chipojola, Malawi.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ramin Samiei Fard, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Kannan CS Warrier, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Exploring the Rotavirus Risk in Latin American Food and Water

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Giuseppe Murdaca, University of Genoa, Italy.

(2) Dr. Charbell Miguel Haddad Kury, Professor, University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Gulnaz Parveen, Women University Swabi, Pakistan.

(2) Pon. Arun, King Institute of Preventive Medicine & Research, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Olena Usachova, Zaporizhzhia State Medical University, Ukraine.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Gulnaz Parveen, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Pon. Arun, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effects of Aqueous Extract of Moringa oleifera Seed on the Histology of the Kidney in Wistar Rats

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Darko Nozic, Professor, Military Medical Academy, General hospital Acibadem Belmedic, Belgrade, Serbia.

Reviewers:

(1) Assumani ZaboIdrissa, National Pedagogical University, DR Congo.

(2) C. Shobana, Vels Institute of Science, Technology and Advanced Studies, India.

(3) P. Shivakumar, PV Narsimha Rao Telangana Veterinary University, India.

(4) Riyadh Muhi Abbood Al-Saegh, College of Medicine, University of Kerbala, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Dharmendra Kumar, Govt. P. G. College Maldevta, India.

(2) Himani Shemar, Dr Rajendra Gode Medical College, India.

(3) K. Latha, The Tamilnadu Dr.M.G.R. Medical University, India.

(4) Md Shehan Habib, Bangladesh.

(5) Nitika Hans, Government Medical College, India.

(6) Patrick Onen, University of Kerala, India.

(7) Radha Ballabh Sati, Uttarakhand Ayurved University, Bharat.

(8) Ravi Shankar M, Adichunchanagiri Institute of Medical Sciences, Adichunchanagiri University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Georgina O. O. Erifeta, Igbinedion University Okada, Nigeria.

(2) Mathieu Nahounou Bleyere, Côte d’Ivoire.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Assumani ZaboIdrissa, DR Congo) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (C. Shobana, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (P. Shivakumar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_4 (Riyadh Muhi Abbood Al-Saegh, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Estimation of the Electrical Energy Potential of Rice Husk Biomass Generated within Ebonyi State, South Eastern Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Pankaj Kumar, Assistant Professor, Dolphin (PG) Institute of Biomedical and Natural Sciences, (Affiliated with H.N.B. Garhwal Central University, Srinagar), India.

Reviewers:

(1) Afam Uzorka, Kampala International University, Uganda.

(2) Kitmo, University of Maroua, Cameroon.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Evangelos Papakitsos, University of West Attica, Greece.

(2) Kafel Abdulazeez Mohammed, University Anbar, Iraq.

(3) Rahim Zahedi, University of Tehran, Iran.

(4) V. B Murali Krishna, National Institute of Technology, India.

(5) Xue Hanzhi, Yonsei University, China.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Karim Choukri, Hassan University of Casablanca, Morocco.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Afam Uzorka, Uganda) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Kitmo, Cameroon) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of In-vitro Antimicrobial, Anti-arthritis and In-vivo Analgesic and Neuropharmacological Investigation of the Bark Extract of Solanum americanum Milli

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Somdet Srichairatanakool, Professor, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.

Reviewers:

(1) Vijay Devra, Janki Devi Bajaj Govt. Girls College, India.

(2) P. Kiranmayi, Acharya Nagarjuna University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Arun Kumar Ramu, PRIST Deemed to be University, India.

(2) Boudiba Louiza, Algeria.

(3) Mohsen   Hashem   Risan, Al-Nahrain University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Vijay Devra, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (P. Kiranmayi, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Editorial Comment | File 1 | Na


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparative Evaluation of Machine Learning Algorithms for Intrusion Detection

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. G. Sudheer, Professor, GVP College of Engineering for Women, Madhurawada, India.

Reviewers:

(1) T S Arulananth, JNTUH, India.

(2) Mohammad Nasar, Mazoon College, Oman.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bakari, Ibrahim Abba, Federal University, Nigeria.

(2) Konduru Upendra Raju, Sri Venkateswara College of Engineering, India.

(3) Mekhfioui Mohcin, Ibn Tofail University, Morocco.

(4) Muhammad Junaid Arshad, Virtual University of Pakistan, Pakistan.

(5) P. Sunitha, Aditya Engineering College, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Timothy Sands, Cornell University, USA.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (T S Arulananth, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Mohammad Nasar, Oman) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Principles of Application of Electric Fields and Electro-Technologies for Food Processing and Extraction of Bioactives from Fruits and Vegetables

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hudson Nyambaka, Kenyatta University, Nairobi, Kenya.

Reviewers:

(1) Ninoska Margarita Paz Palacios, Universidad Bolivariana De Venezuela, Venezuela.

(2) Mohan Gandhi Bonthu, V.V. Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Arun K Singh, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ninoska Margarita Paz Palacios, Venezuela) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Mohan Gandhi Bonthu, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA