Peer Review History: Revolutionizing Agriculture Libraries in India: A Comprehensive Study on Implementing Near Field Communication (NFC) Technology for Enhanced Access and Knowledge Sharing

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Roxana Plesa, Senior Lecturer, University of Petrosani, Romania.

(2) Dr. Sailendra Narayan Goswami, Agriculture, Natural Resource Management, Government of Assam, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Romi Fajar Tanjung, Universitas Sriwijaya, Indonesia.

(2) Azadeh Moosavi, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Athitaya Nitchot, Prince of Songkla University, Thailand.

(2) Samaneh Alizadeh, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

(3) Zutaah Puotier, Presbyterian College of Education, Ghana.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Romi Fajar Tanjung, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Azadeh Moosavi, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Emerging Food Processing and Preservation Approaches for Nutrition and Health

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, Tainan University of Technology, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Nura Mohammed, Kaduna State College of Education, Nigeria.

(2) Sumit Kumar Dubey, D. L. S. P. G. College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bougma Sanogo, Joseph Ki-Zerbo University, Burkina Faso.

(2) Ossama Dimassi, American University if Europe, Lebanon.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Kifle Habte Balcha, Ethiopia.

(2) Sadia Hassan, The University of Faisalabad, Pakistan.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nura Mohammed, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sumit Kumar Dubey, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Physico-Chemical Characteristics of Cervical Mucus in Repeat Breeder Crossbred Cows Following Ceftiofur Therapy

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Tzasna Hernandez Delgado, Laboratory of Pharmacognosie, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Oloyede Olanrewaju Solomon, University of Benin, Nigeria.

(2) Mohammed Ali Makki Al Rubaee, Wasit University, Iraq.

(3) Maab I. AL-Farwachi, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Mosul, Iraq.

(4) Fuziaton Baharudin, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Shireen Rashid Mohammed, University of Zakho, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Ibrahim Mehdi, Jigjiga University, Ethiopia.

(2) Judith Lum Ndamukong, University of Yaounde 1, Cameroon.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.55/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Oloyede Olanrewaju Solomon, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mohammed Ali Makki Al Rubaee, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Maab I. AL-Farwachi, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Fuziaton Baharudin, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of Veterinary Education on Ethical Issue Perception

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, Tainan University of Technology, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Jacopo Morelli, Università degli studi di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Italy.

(2) Oleksii Sheviakov, Ukrainian State University of Science and Technology, Ukraine.

(3) Asfa Sakhawat, University of Veterinary and Animal Science, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jacopo Morelli, Italy) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Oleksii Sheviakov, Ukraine) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Asfa Sakhawat, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Yield Gap Analysis for Enhancement of Rice Production and Productivity under Rain-Fed Condition of Chandel, Manipur, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Surapong Pinitglang, Assistant Professor & Dean, School of Science and Technology, University of the Thai Chamber of Commerce, Thailand.

(2) Prof. Mario A. Pagnotta, President of the Degree Course in Mountain Sciences, Tuscia University, Italy.

(3) Dr. Ahmed Mohammed Abu-Dief Mohammed, Assistant Professor, Sohag University, Sohag, Egypt and Taibah University, Saudi Arabia.

Reviewers:

(1) Muhammad Mehran Anjum, Switzerland University of Zurich, Switzerland.

(2) Khin Khin Mu, Myanmar.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.2/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Muhammad Mehran Anjum, Switzerland) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Khin Khin Mu, Myanmar) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Religious Affiliation’s Influence on How Veterinary Students and Scientist’s View Bioethical Concerns

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Farzaneh Mohamadpour, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Sushma Desai, Gitam University, India.

(2) Mojtaba Esmailpour Roshan, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

(3) Ankesh Kumar, Bihar Veterinary College, Bihar Animal Sciences University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sushma Desai, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mojtaba Esmailpour Roshan, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ankesh Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Distribution of Physicochemical Parameters and Heavy Metals at Automobile Mechanic Dumpsites in Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hasan Aydogan, Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Nivetha Martin, Arul Anandar College, India.

(2) Dinh Tran Ngoc Huy, International University of Japan, Japan, Asian Institute of Technology, Thailand.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Muminjan, Fergana State University, Uzbekistan.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nivetha Martin, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Dinh Tran Ngoc Huy, Japan, Thailand) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Electricity Consumption and Economic Growth in Kenya: an ARDL Bound Test Approach

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Aleksey Khlopytskyi, Associate Professor, Ukrainian State University of Chemical Technology, Ukraine.

Reviewers:

(1) Gabriel Obed Fosu, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Ghana.

(2) Rokonuzzaman, University of Chittagong, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Muhammad Meraj, Mohammad Ali Jinnah University, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Afam Uzorka, Kampala International University, Uganda.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Gabriel Obed Fosu, Ghana) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rokonuzzaman, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Choosing Confidence Intervals in Bioequivalence Studies: 100(1 – 2 α )% and 100(1 – α )% Approaches

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Özlem Gürünlü Alma, Muğla Sıtkı Kocman University, Turkey.

(2) Dr. S. M. Aqil Burney, University of Karachi, Pakistan.

(3) Prof. Emeritus Manuel Alberto M. Ferreira, Iscte-Instituto Universitário de Lisboa, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Dmitriy Klyushin, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Ukraine.

(2) Xingsi Xue, School of Computer Science and Mathematics, Fujian University of Technology, China.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.2/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Dmitriy Klyushin, Ukraine) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Xingsi Xue, China) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Modelling Mortality in Kenya

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sheng Zhang, School of Mathematics and Physics, Bohai University, Jinzhou, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Ogungbenle Gbenga, University of Jos, Nigeria.

(2) Manlika Ratchagit, Maejo University, Thailand.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ogungbenle Gbenga, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Manlika Ratchagit, Thailand) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA