Peer Review History: Effect of Genetic and Non-Genetic Factors on Productive and Reproductive Performances of Dairy Cattle at TALIRI–Tanga

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fabio da Costa Henry, Associate Professor, State University of Northern of Rio de Janeiro, UENF, Brasil.

Reviewers:

(1) H.Y. Abbaya, Adamawa State University, Nigeria.

(2) Manjari Pandey, College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Bihar Animal Sciences University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Shailendra Kumar Rajak, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, India.

(2) Sharew Mekonnen Haile, Werabe University, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Demilade Ibiwoye, North Carolina State University, United States.

(2) Dibyajyoti Talukdar, Central Agricultural University, India.

(3) Ganesh Mahadeo Gadegaonkar, Maharashtra Animal and Fishery Sciences University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (H.Y. Abbaya, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Manjari Pandey, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Estimation of Length-Weight and Condition Factor of Indian Major Carps and Selected Indigenous Fish Species in Chandrakeshar Reservoir, Dewas (M.P.), India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Luis Enrique Ibarra Morales, Research Professor, State University of Sonora, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Maryyum Khalil, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Pakistan.

(2) Suntorn Wittayakun, Rajamangala University of Technology, Thailand.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Rahman, Pattimura University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Maryyum Khalil, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Suntorn Wittayakun, Thailand) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Exploring Microeconomic Dynamics and Challenges in Vegetable-Based Farming System

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohamed Fadel, National Research Center, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) El Aich Ahmed, Institut of Agronomique et Vétérinaire Hassan II, Morocco.

(2) Gde Eka Martiningsih, Universitas Mahasaraswati Denpasar, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (El Aich Ahmed, Morocco) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Gde Eka Martiningsih, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Barriers and Strategies of Reporting Medical Errors at Benghazi Medical Center: A Cross-sectional Study in Benghazi City, Libya

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Erich Cosmi, Associate Professor, University of Padua, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Md Mortuza Ahmmed, American International University, Bangladesh.

(2) Derya Şimşekli, Ardahan University, Turkey.

(3) Pouran Famili, University of Pittsburgh, USA.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Jiwon Ryoo, Bucheon St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Republic of Korea.

(2) Shahnawaz Hamid Khan, Sheri Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Akram Chhaybi, AbdelMalik Essaadi, Morocco.

(2) T. Suseelal, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Md Mortuza Ahmmed, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Derya Şimşekli, Turkey) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Pouran Famili, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparative Study on Ethanol Production from Sweet Potato Flour and Sugarcane Juice Using Thermotolerant Kluyveromyces marxianus

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Matheus Poletto, Professor, Universidade de Caxias do Sul, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Manishita Das Mukherji, Amity Institute of Biotechnology, Amity University, India.

(2) Sugeng Hadi Susilo, State Polytechnic of Malang, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Manishita Das Mukherji, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sugeng Hadi Susilo, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA 


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Eye Camp and its Impact on the Patients and Community

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Francesco Saverio Sorrentino, Sorrentino Studio Oculistico, Francesco Saverio Sorrentino, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Mohammed Abrar Ahmed, Navodaya Medical College, Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, India.

(2) Mujeeb Ur Rehman Parrey, Northern Border University, Saudi Arabia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Rupankar Sarkar, Teerthankar Mahaveer University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Jamshed Ali, Era University, India.

(2) Priyanka Das, Medanta Hospital, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mohammed Abrar Ahmed, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mujeeb Ur Rehman Parrey, Saudi Arabia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Bio-efficacy and Phytotoxicity of Gibberellic Acid (GA3) Technical 90% for Improving Yield and Quality in Grapes (Vitis vinifera L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Saheb Pal, Scientist, ICAR- Indian Agricultural Research Institute, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Praveen Kumar Chachaiya, Agriculture University, India.

(2) Cardei Petru, The National Institute of Research – Development for Machines and Installations Designed for Agriculture and Food Industry, Romania.

(3) Ana Maria Arambarri, Universidad Nacional De La Plata, Argentina.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Monica Guadalupe Lozano Contreras, National Institute of Forest Research Agricultural and Livestock (INIFAP), Mexico.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.43/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Praveen Kumar Chachaiya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Cardei Petru, Romania) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ana Maria Arambarri, Argentina) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Exogenous Plant Growth Regulators on Growth, Yield, and Quality of Parthenocarpic Cucumber/English Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) under Protected Condition

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Pravallika Sree Rayanoothala, Assistant Professor, CV Raman Global University, Bubaneswar, Odisha, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Celimphilo Mavuso, University of Eswatini, Eswatini.

(2) Shukri I. Rekani, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Jyothi T.V., India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Celimphilo Mavuso, Eswatini) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shukri I. Rekani, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Morpho-physiological Alteration of Mangifera indica L. in Response to Sea Water Induced Salt Stress

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Nesreen Houssien Ahmed Abou-Baker, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Sanjoy Shil, BCKV, India.

(2) Kamyar Shameli, Medical School, Virology Institute, Technology University of Munich, Germany.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abderrahim El Keroumi, Semlalia, Cadi Ayyad University, Morocco.

(2) Mucahit Kivrak, University of Balikesir, Turkiye.

(3) Phyo La Pyae Won, Yezin Agricultural University, Myanmar.

(4) Swe Swe Mar, Yezin Agricultural University, Myanmar.

(5) Ved Prakash, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, India.

(6) Virupakshi Hiremata, ICAR- Indian Institute of Horticultural Research Bengaluru, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Sahraoui Naima, Blida 1 University, Algeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sanjoy Shil, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kamyar Shameli, Germany) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Afro Medicinal Plants a Promising Remedy for Sickle Cell Anemia

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Juan Carlos Troiano, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Reviewers:

(1) Theeranat Suwanaruang, Kalasin University, Thailand.

(2) Pavan Goyal, Apollo College of Veterinary Medicine, RAJUVAS, India.

(3) Siti Nurhidayah, Binawan University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) K. Baskaran, Chengalpattu Medical College, India.

(2) Yogita Shrivas, DMAMCHRC, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Theeranat Suwanaruang, Thailand) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pavan Goyal, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Siti Nurhidayah, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA