Peer Review History: Evaluation of Okra Varieties under Sub-humid Plains of South-East Rajasthan for Morphological and Phenological Traits

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Rusu Teodor, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Hina Saleem, University of Agriculture, Pakistan.

(2) Momoh Shuaibu, Federal Polytechnic, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bizuayehu Desta Ashenafi, Debre Berhan University, Ethiopia.

(2) Jamila Dirbas, Syria.

(3) J. Ebenesar Anna Bagyam, Karpagam Academy of Higher Education, India.

(4) Muhammad Sajid, MNS University of Agriculture, Pakistan.

(5) Zubairu Habiba, University of Abuja, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Gizachew Haile, Addis Ababa Science and Technology University, Ethiopia.

(2) Momoh Shuaibu, Federal Polytechnic Kaura Namoda, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hina Saleem, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Momoh Shuaibu, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Review: Application of Cold Plasma in Food Processing Industry

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, Tainan University of Technology, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Ali Anvari, University of Missouri, United States.

(2) Khaled Hamed El-Shorbagy, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Sikha Bhaduri, USA.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) K. Meera Sankarankutty, S.N.D.T Womens University, India.

(2) Sushma Rani Thiyyagura, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.95/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ali Anvari, United States) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Khaled Hamed El-Shorbagy, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Miracle Multipurpose Tree (Moringa oleifera) with Recent Applications in Agriculture

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Elena Lanchares Sancho, Associate Professor, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.

Reviewers:

(1) Oluyemisi Omotayo Omonije, Fedreal University of Technology, Nigeria.

(2) Mualla Keten Gokkus, Nevsehir Haci Bektas Veli University, Türkiye.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Maged Mohammed Basuliman, Hadramout University, Yemen.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Oluyemisi Omotayo Omonije, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mualla Keten Gokkus, Türkiye) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Vitamin C Supplementation Lowered Atherogenic Lipid Parameters among Oil and Gas Workers Occupationally Exposed to Petroleum Fumes in Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Erich Cosmi, Chair & Director, University of Padua School of Medicine, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Cinosh Mathew, SBKS Medical Institute and Research Centre, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth Deemed to be University, India.

(2) Sowjanya U V P U, Government Medical College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Reshma Ajay, Pulla Reddy Institute of Pharmacy, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Cinosh Mathew, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sowjanya U V P U, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Growth, Yield Attributes, Yield and Economics of Mustard (Brassica Juncea L.) as Affected by Different Varieties and Spacing

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Marco Trevisan, DiSTAS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Zhaleh Soheilikhah, Razi University, Iran.

(2) Yasser Mohammad Mohammad Osman, Horticulture Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Zhaleh Soheilikhah, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Yasser Mohammad Mohammad Osman, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Journal Change | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evolution of Air-Sea CO2 Flux during ARAMIS, EGEE and ROAM

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Isidro Alberto Pérez Bartolomé, University of Valladolid, Spain.

Reviewers:

(1) D. Shiva Kumar, India.

(2) Amizon Azizan, School of Chemical Engineering, College of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.65/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (D. Shiva Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Amizon Azizan, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Post Harvest Anthracnose of Mango Caused by Colletotrichum gloeosporioides: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sung-Kun Kim, Northeastern State University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Muhammad Rafiq, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China.

(2) James Hellyward, Andalas University, Indonesia.

(3) Frederico Denardi, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Elham Baninaiem, University of Hormozgan, Iran.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Muhammad Rafiq, China) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (James Hellyward, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Frederico Denardi, Brazil) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Digital Technology: A Game Changer in Vegetable Cultivation

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ibrahim Farah, Jackson State University, Mississippi, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Deepak Meena, MPUAT, India.

(2) Kirti Verma, Gyan Ganga institute of Technology and Sciences, India.

(3) Kushagra Agrawal, School of Computer Engineering, KIIT, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Shashi Kant Gupta, Eudoxia Research University, USA.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Deepak Meena, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kirti Verma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Kushagra Agrawal, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Solving Mathematics Problems Based on Visual Information Processing

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Abdullah Aydin, Kırşehir Ahi Evran University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Shashi Verma, SRMSCET, India.

(2) Geraldo Claudio Broetto, Instituto Federal do Espírito Santo, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.95/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shashi Verma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Geraldo Claudio Broetto, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Factors Affecting the Middle School Students Academic Performance of Raigarh, Chhattisgarh (India) Depending on Socioeconomic Status of their Parent

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Abdullah Aydin, Kırşehir Ahi Evran University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Tehseen Tahir, The University of Haripur, Pakistan.

(2) Mark M. Alipio, College of Radiologic Technology, Iligan Medical Center College, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ma Rizza Villamor, Page Middle School, USA.

(2) Masoud Janbozorgi, Research Institution of Hawzeh and University, I.R. Iran.

(3) Otiti, Onesimus Elechi, Rivers State University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Tehseen Tahir, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mark M. Alipio, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA