Peer Review History: Public Sector Employees’ Arrangement and Plans Towards Retirement in Ghana

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. (Dr.) Rajendra Parsad Gunputh, The University of Mauritius, Réduit, Mauritius.

Reviewers:

(1) M. Lavanya, School of Management Studies, Sathyabama Institute of Science and Technology, India.

(2) Dilip Ganguly, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (M. Lavanya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Dilip Ganguly, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Apert’s Disease: Three Case Reports and Review of the Literature

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Charbell Miguel Haddad Kury, University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Francisco Cammarata, Regional of Antofagasta Hospital, Chile.

(2) Soma Rani Roy, Chittagong Eye Infirmary, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Coşkun Armağan, Dokuz Eylül University, Turkey.

(2) Paras Sharma, Jain (Deemed-To-Be) University, India.

(3) Taher Mistry, Saifee Hospital, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Francisco Cammarata, Chile) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Soma Rani Roy, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Citation Analysis of Post Graduate Theses Submitted to Department of Renewable Energy Sources in College of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, Dr. Balasaheb Sawant Konkan Krishi Vidyapeeth, Dapoli, Maharashtra

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ravi Kant Chaturvedi, Center for Integrative Conservation & Yunnan Key Laboratory for Conservation of Tropical Rainforests & Asian Elephant, Chinese Academy of Sciences, P.R. China.

Reviewers:

(1) Yana Priyana, Eastasouth Institute, Indonesia.

(2) Elham Abdolahpour, Iran.

(3) Saeed Malekmohammadi, Institute for Higher Education, ACECR, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Fiesty Utami, University of Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Yana Priyana, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Elham Abdolahpour, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Saeed Malekmohammadi, Iran) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Different Okra Varieties for Yield, Quality and, Economical Feasibility Cultivated in the Hadoti Region of South-East Rajasthan, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. T. Muthukumar, Bharathiar University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Babagana Umar, Yobe State College of Agriculture Science and Technology, Nigeria.

(2) Muhammad Sajid, MNS-University of Agriculture, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Jamila Dirbas, Syria.

(2) K. M. Khalequzzaman, Spices Research Centre, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute, , Bangladesh.

(3) Samson Moges, Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Babagana Umar, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Muhammad Sajid, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Enhancing Data Access Security through the Utilization of [2048,512,4] Linear Code

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rachana Pathak, Assistant Professor, University of Lucknow, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Dalal Abdulmohsin Hammood, Middle Technical University, Electrical Engineering Technical College, Iraq.

(2) Neelima K, Mohan Babu University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Devisha Arunadevi Tiwari, Ace College of Engineering, India.

(2) P. Chella Pandian, Srimad Andavan Arts and Science College, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Navneet Kaur, Sagar Institute of Research and Technology, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Dalal Abdulmohsin Hammood, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Neelima K, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Influence of Various Methods of Sowing and Organic Manures on the Productivity of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Asma Hanif, Assistant Professor, University of Karachi, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Adib Ali Saad, Al- Manara University, Syria.

(2) Bryan Glomel S. Silverio, University of Science and Technology of Southern Philippines, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Marwan Abdullah Al-Sanam, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Namgay Rinchen, Bhutan.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Adib Ali Saad, Syria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bryan Glomel S. Silverio, Philippines) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Organic Farming Practices on Soil Chemical Properties

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Daniele De Wrachien (Retired), The State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Fatemeh Aghaei, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Iran.

(2) Boureima Kabore, Université  Norbert Zongo, Burkina Faso.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.95/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Fatemeh Aghaei, Iran) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Boureima Kabore, Burkina Faso) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Biology of Fall Armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith) on Maize under Laboratory Conditions

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Assistant Professor and Hod, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College, Karnataka, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Iosob Gabriel-Alin, Vegetable Research and Development Station, Romania.

(2) Muhammad Nauman, Institute of Plant Protection, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anup Chandra, Indian Institute of Pulses Research, India.

(2) Priyadharshini V, Annamalai University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Swagatika Sahoo, National Rice Research Institute, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Iosob Gabriel-Alin, Romania) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Muhammad Nauman, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Target Ranges and PTH Profile in A West African Population Using 2nd and 3rd Generation Tests

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sevgul Donmez, Mugla Sitki Kocman University, Turkey.

(2) Dr. Chan-Min Liu, School of Life Science, Xuzhou Normal University, Xuzhou City, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Sanjay P Dhangar, Vishwa Raj Hospital, India.

(2) Rashi Nigam, Rama University, India.

(3) Meghana P, Apollo Hospitals, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sanjay P Dhangar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rashi Nigam, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Meghana P, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Place of Echo Endoscopy in Unexplained Acute Pancreatitis: A Retrospective Study

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Veera Muthumari, Assistant Professor, V.V.Vanniaperumal College for Women, Virudhunagar, Tamil Nadu, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Muhammad Kashif, Lady Reading Hospital, Pakistan.

(2) Nabeel Ayappali Kalluvalappil, University of Science and Technology of Fujairah, UAE.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Purvant Shubhashri Rajendra, Osmania Medical College, India.

(2) Tejeswari Sahu, Vignan Institute of Pharmaceutical Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Muhammad Kashif, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nabeel Ayappali Kalluvalappil, UAE) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA