Editor(s):

(1) Lesław Juszczak, Associate professor, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Poland.

(2) Dr. Ahmed Mohammed Abu-Dief Mohammed, Assistant Professor, Sohag University, Sohag, Egypt and Taibah University, Saudi Arabia.

Reviewers:

(1) Fadeyi Olasupo James, Federal University of Agriculture, Nigeria.

(2) Abiodun Jacob Osatogbe, Kebbi State University of Science and Technology, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Fadeyi Olasupo James, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Abiodun Jacob Osatogbe, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Paola Angelini, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Victor Mbuku Mutinda, Egerton University, Kenya.

(2) Ambugus O. Peter, Nigerian Institute of Leather and Science Technology, Nigeria.

(3) Ravi Kiran Arigela, Arid Zone Regional Centre, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bhargavi.G, India.

(2) Manisha Sharma, Assam Agricultural University, India.

(3) Nayana, H. N., GKVK, India.

(4) Preetheekha Elangovan, India.

(5) Supriya, India.

(6) Tilling Tayo, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Narendra Kumar Ahirwar, Mahatma Gandhi Chitrakoot Gramodaya Vishwavidhyalaya, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Victor Mbuku Mutinda, Kenya) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ambugus O. Peter, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ravi Kiran Arigela, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Khoy Branch, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Sintayehu Gedifew, Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Ethiopia.

(2) Seham Mansour Ismail, Central Agricultural Pesticides Laboratory, Agriculture Research Center, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Bahram Tafaghodinia, Iranian Research Organization for Science and Technology, Iran.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sintayehu Gedifew, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Seham Mansour Ismail, Egypt) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Shankar Srinivasan, Rutgers – School of Health Professions, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Gauri Metkar, MIMER Medical College, MUHS, India.

(2) Siti Nurfatimah Mohd Shahpudin, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Gauri Metkar, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Siti Nurfatimah Mohd Shahpudin, Malaysia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ghulam Khaliq, Associate Professor, Lasbela University of Agriculture, Water & Marine Sciences, Uthal, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Sana Fatima Dogar, Shalamar Institute of Health Sciences, Shalamar Medical and Dental College, Pakistan.

(2) Harshad Sharad Vanmali, S. D. Arts, V. S. Apte Commerce, M. H. Mehta Science College Palghar, University of Mumbai, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Elasari Dwi Pratiwi, University of Muhammadiyah Lamongan, Indonesia.

(2) Shaimaa Sayed Mohamed El-Sayed, Luxor University, Egypt.

(3) R.Ragunathan, Bharathiar University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Armando Abel Massingue, Universidade Eduardo Mondlane, Mozambique.

(2) Dhananjay Pandey, Govt. Naveen Girls College, India.

(3) Thiagarajan J, J J College of Engineering and Technology, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.45/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sana Fatima Dogar, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Harshad Sharad Vanmali, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vlasta Hus, Associate Professor, University of Maribor, Koroška Cesta 160, Slovenia.

Reviewers:

(1) Ly Van An, Tay Ninh University, Vietnam.

(2) Philip Asiedu Kyeremateng, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Ghana.

(3) Sk Chand Basha, KL Deemed to be University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ezekiel Olusegun Babatunde, University of Ibadan, Nigeria.

(2) Cem Kurdal, Türkiye.

(3) Eddie Aparicio Landa, Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán, México.

(4) Ng Chiew Leng, University of Science Malaysia, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Celina Aparecida Almeida Pereira Abar, Pontifical Catholic University of São Paulo, Brazil.

(2) Dewi Mardhiyana, Pekalongan University, Indonesia.

(3) Zakaria Ndemo, Bindura University of Science Education, Zimbabwe.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ly Van An, Vietnam) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Philip Asiedu Kyeremateng, Ghana) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sk Chand Basha, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Emeritus Manuel Alberto M. Ferreira, Iscte-Instituto Universitário de Lisboa, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Deepika Mallampati, Osmania University, India.

(2) Moch. Syamsudin, University of Jember, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Umesh Bhagat, Indian institute of Technology Madras, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Deepika Mallampati, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Moch. Syamsudin, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Roxana Plesa, Senior Lecturer, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Muhammad Javaid Jamil, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Pakistan.

(2) A. Rasul, STKIP Hermon, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Muhammad Javaid Jamil, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (A. Rasul, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Nguyen Van Toan, School of Biotechnology, Vietnam National University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.

(2) Dr. M. A. Elbagermi, Misurata University, Libya.

Reviewers:

(1) Mojgan Soleimanizadeh, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Hormozgan, Iran.

(2) Walaa Abdel-kader Ramadan Ibrahim, Biotechnology Institute, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Dmytro Chuiko, State Biotechnological University, Ukraine.

(2) Sandeep Bhardwaj, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Mtibaa Latifa, Military Hospital of Tunis, Tunisia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.65/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mojgan Soleimanizadeh, Iran) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Walaa Abdel-kader Ramadan Ibrahim, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ahmed Mohammed Abu-Dief Mohammed, Assistant Professor, Sohag University, Sohag, Egypt and Taibah University, Saudi Arabia.

Reviewers:

(1) Sandeep Bhardwaj, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, India.

(2) Mohanad Aljanabi, Al-Furat Al-Awsat Technical University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ankitha. H, SNPA Govt. Ayurved College Raipur, India.

(2) Brij Bihari Pandey, Indira Gandhi Agricultural University, India.

(3) Kiran Patnaik, Odisha University of Agriculture And Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Sarhan Ahmed Soliman, Egypt.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sandeep Bhardwaj, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mohanad Aljanabi, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA