Peer Review History: Comparative Analysis of Nickel Adsorption by Natural Sisal Fiber and Treated with Citric Acid

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Parineeta Samant, MGM Medical College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Enju Wang, St. John’s University, USA.

(2) Chethan G, Mangalore University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Enju Wang, USA) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Chethan G, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Self Medication Against COVID19 Infection: Assessment of Practices among Residents in a Semi Urban Nigerian Community

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Aurora Martínez Romero, Juarez University, Durango, Mexico.

(2) Dr. Bagiu Iulia-Cristina, Assistant Professor, Multidisciplinary Research Center on Antimicrobial Resistance, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Mostafa Abbas Shalaby, Cairo University, Egypt.

(2) Paryati, University Pembangunan  National  “Veteran”, Indonesia.

(3) Zakaria Ahmed, Bangladesh Jute Research Institute, Bangladesh.

(4) Sayed Rashad Ahmed, Agricultural Research Center, Egypt.

(5) Usachova Olena, Zaporizhzhia State Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Ukraine.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.54/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mostafa Abbas Shalaby, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Paryati, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Zakaria Ahmed, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Sayed Rashad Ahmed, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_5 (Usachova Olena, Ukraine) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Time Perspectives and Personality Traits of Filipino College Students in Davao Region: A Quantitative Analysis

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Bei Lyu, Associate Professor, School of Economics and Management, Huaibei Normal University of China and Distinguished Professor, Chinese Graduate School, Panyapiwat Institute of Management, Thailand.

(2) Dr. Roxana Plesa, Senior Lecturer, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Maylaf Hiruy Alemayehu, KDI School of Public Policy and Management, Ethiopia.

(2) Sonakshi Nayar, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Maylaf Hiruy Alemayehu, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sonakshi Nayar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Role of Sensing Capability, Learning Capability and Coordinating Capability on Market Performance: Perspective of Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chun-Chien Kuo, National Taipei University of Business, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Nilna Muna, Universitas Pendidikan Nasional, Indonesia.

(2) Akeem Olanrewaju Ajani, Lagos State University of Science and Technology, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nilna Muna, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Akeem Olanrewaju Ajani, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Income Generation Opportunities through Secondary Agriculture towards Sustainability in Angul District of Odisha: A Case Study

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Yong X. Gan, Associate Professor, California State Polytechnic University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Hasnain Raza, College of Social Science China, China.

(2) Pradip Hajong, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hasnain Raza, China) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pradip Hajong, Bangladesh) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Journal Change_1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Examining the Effects of Diverse Irrigation Regimens and Planting Timelines on Wheat Growth, Yield, and Yield Characteristics

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mariusz Cycoń, Medical University of Silesia, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) W U L Ambagaspitiya, Lincoln University, Sri Lanka.

(2) Hegedus Cristina, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca, România.

(3) V.N. Meena Devi, Noorul Islam Centre for Higher Education, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (W U L Ambagaspitiya, Sri Lanka) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hegedus Cristina, România) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (V. N. Meena Devi, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Nutrient, Phytonutrient Composition, and Antioxidant Activity Analysis of Fresh and Cabinet Dried Coconut (Cocos nucifera L.) Inflorescence

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Paola Angelini. University of Perugia, Italy.

(2) Prof. Marcello Iriti, Milan State University, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Arvind Kumar, AIIMS Rishikesh, India.

(2) Virendra Singh, M.L.N. Medical College, India.

(3) M. G.Rajiniganth, Harshini Hospital, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.26/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Arvind Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Virendra Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (M.G.Rajiniganth , India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Tillage Practices and Fertility Levels on Growth, Yield Attributes and Yield of Wheat in Rice- Wheat Cropping System

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Langa Tembo, University of Zambia, Zambia.

Reviewers:

(1) Fadeyi Olasupo James, Federal University of Agriculture Abeokuta, Nigeria.

(2) Subik Shrestha, Technical University of Munich, Germany.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Fadeyi Olasupo James, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Subik Shrestha, Germany) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Enhancing Nutritional Value: Formulation and Analysis of Rice Cake Enriched with Green Gram Pea

Editor(s):

(1) Prof.  Nelson Pérez Guerra, Ourense Campus, University of Vigo, Spain.

Reviewers:

(1) Bahidin Laode Mpapa, Muhammadiyah University of Luwuk Banggai, Indonesia.

(2) Naseem Akhtar, Soil Fertility Research Institute Lahore, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bahidin Laode Mpapa, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Naseem Akhtar, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Role of Sucrose Ester for Enhancing the Food Quality and Safety: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Hudson Nyambaka, Kenyatta University, Kenya.

Reviewers:

(1) Igor Stadnyk, Ternopil Ivan Pului National Technical University, Ukraine.

(2) Tabeen Irfan, Superior University Lahore, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Igor Stadnyk, Ukraine) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Tabeen Irfan, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA