Peer Review History: Effects of Packaging Material and Moisture Contents on Pulse Beetle Infestation under Different Storage Conditions in Chickpea

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohamed Fadel, National Research Center, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Mesfin Wolde, Bonga Agricultural Research Center, Ethiopia.

(2) Hisworo Ramdani, IPB University, Trilogi University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mesfin Wolde, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hisworo Ramdani, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Biochemical Effects of High Concentration of Colocasia Esculenta Flour Fed on Streptozotocin-Induced Diabetic Rats

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rameshwari Thakur, Associate Professor, Muzaffarnagar Medical College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Krishnaraju Venkatesan, King khalid University, Saudi Arabia.

(2) Saleh Ahmed Jalal Siam, American International University, Bangladesh.

(3) Md Saifur Rahman, Chittagong University of Engineering and Technology(CUET), Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Krishnaraju Venkatesan, Saudi Arabia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Saleh Ahmed Jalal Siam, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Md Saifur Rahman, Bangladesh) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Entomophthorales Fungi Parasitizing Sucking Insects in Egypt

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Dhasarathan, Prathyusha Engineering College, Anna University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Nushiba Naser P T, University of Calicut, India.

(2) Surya Prabha Matangi, Vignan’s Foundation for Science, Technology and Research, Deemed to be University, India.

(3) Muhammad Sajjad, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nushiba Naser P T, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Surya Prabha Matangi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Muhammad Sajjad, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Survey of Hospitalizations due to Leishmaniasis in Adults during the Pre and Post COVID-19 Pandemic Periods in Feira de Santana, Brazil

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Janvier Gasana, Kuwait University, Kuwait.

(2) Dr. Muhammad Akram, Associate Professor, Government College University, Faisalabad, Pakistan.

(3) Prof. Giuseppe Murdaca, University of Genoa, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Valentina Divocha, Ukrainian Research Institute for Medicine of Transpot, Ukraine.

(2) Agustin Joison, Cordoba Catholic University, Argentina.

(3) Anand Bhogaraju, Malla Reddy Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

(4) Patricia Rivera Vazquez, Universidad Autonoma De Tamaulipas, Mexico.

(5) Jay Devraj Kansara, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Valentina Divocha, Ukraine) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Agustin Joison, Argentina) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Anand Bhogaraju, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Patricia Rivera Vazquez, Mexico) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_5 (Jay Devraj Kansara, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Effect of Implementing Learning Models Cycle 7e on Mathematical Problems-Solving Ability

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. E.Seda Koç, Associate Professor, Namık Kemal University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) John Gathage Kunga, Kirinyaga University, Kenya.

(2) SVB Subrahmanyeswara Rao, Ramachandra College of Engineering, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (John Gathage Kunga, Kenya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (SVB Subrahmanyeswara Rao, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Review on Sonochemical Treatment of Dye Molecules

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Lamsoudi Redouane, Regional Center for Education and Training Professions Casablanca- Settat, El Jadida Provincial Section, Morocco.

Reviewers:

(1) Hanane Etabti, University Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah, Morocco.

(2) Akbar Mohammadidoust, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hanane Etabti, Morocco) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Akbar Mohammadidoust, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Exploring the Benefits of e-Extension Tools: Perspectives from Extension Personnel

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Aleksandr Nikolaevich Sekisov, Kuban State Agrarian University, Russia and Institute of Construction and Transport Infrastructure, Kuban State Technological University, Russia.

Reviewers:

(1) Sandeep Kumar Singh, India.

(2) Nguyen Quang Linh, Hue University, Vietnam.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sandeep Kumar Singh, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nguyen Quang Linh, Vietnam) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of CERES –Rice Model for Simulating Rice Yield and Phenophases

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Al-Quds Open University, Hebron Branch, Palestine.

(2) Prof. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) S.Balambigai, Kongu Engineering College, India.

(2) Anupoju Varaprasad, MVGR College of Engineering, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (S. Balambigai, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anupoju Varaprasad, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Combined Impact of Phosphorus Solubilizng Bacteria and Single Super Phosphate on Soil Nutrient Availability in Sunflower and Chickpea

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Saheb Pal, Scientist, ICAR- Indian Agricultural Research Institute, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Milda Ernita, TamanSiswa University, Indonesia.

(2) Junir Antônio Lutinski, Universidade Comunitária da Região de Chapecó, Chapecó, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Milda Ernita, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Junir Antônio Lutinski, Brazil) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effects of Aqueous Fruit Extract of Annona muricata on Testosterone Propionate Induced Benign Prostate Hyperplasia (BPH) in Male Wistar Rats

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Dr. Mohamed Fawzy Ramadan Hasssanien, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.

Reviewers:

(1) Fatemeh Khatami, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

(2) W.M. Kalpani Madhushika Ratnayake, Sri Lanka.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Fatemeh Khatami, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (W. M. Kalpani Madhushika Ratnayake, Sri Lanka) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA