Peer Review History: Stability-indicating Reverse Phase-HPLC Method Development and Method Validation for Quantitative Determination of Degradation Products in Favipiravir API and Drug Product

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Charbell Miguel Haddad Kury, University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Bhoomi Patel, Rai University, India.

(2) R Nageswara Rao, Santhiram College of Pharmacy, India.

(3) Enas Abdal-Raouf Ammar Semysim, University of Kufa, Iraq

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.47/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bhoomi Patel, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (R Nageswara Rao , India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Enas Abdal-Raouf Ammar Semysim, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Performance of Different Varieties of Gladiolus under Prayagraj agro-Climatic conditions

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Assistant Professor, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Mahmoud Okasha, Agricultural Engineering Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Egypt.

(2) Sameer Mohapatro, Centurion University of Technology and Management, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mahmoud Okasha, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sameer Mohapatro, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effectiveness of Different Desensitizing Protocols in In-Office Dental Whitening: Clinical, Blind and Randomized Study

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Barbara Giambene, Al Emadi Hospital, Doha, Qatar.

Reviewers:

(1) Mohammed Nasser Mohammed Anwar, Ain-Shams University, Egypt.

(2) Shwetha K.M, M. S. Ramaiah University of Applied Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mohammed Nasser Mohammed Anwar, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shwetha K.M., India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Persistent Homology in Solar Production

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Danilo Costarelli, Associate professor, University of Perugia, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Carlos Henrique Tognon, University of São Paulo, Brazil.

(2) Abdullahi Isyaku, Federal College of Animal Health and Production Technology Ibadan, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Carlos Henrique Tognon, Brazil) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Abdullahi Isyaku, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Technology Integration and Attitude Towards New Food as Predictors of Self-Efficacy in Cooking

Editor(s):

(1) Prof.  Nelson Pérez Guerra, Ourense Campus, University of Vigo, Spain.

Reviewers:

(1) Swapan Banerjee, Seacom Skills University, India.

(2) Archana Mandal, MIMS, Mandya, Germany.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Swapan Banerjee, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Archana Mandal, Germany) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of Nigerian Television Authority’s Drama Programmes on Child Abuse among Residents of Abuja Municipal Area Council Federal Capital Territory Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Roxana Plesa, Senior Lecturer, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) S. Hemalatha, SSM Institute of Engineering and Technology, India.

(2) Sepideh Harzand-Jadidi, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

(3) Madhuri Amit Sahu, G. H. Raisoni College of Engineering, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (S. Hemalatha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sepideh Harzand-Jadidi, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Madhuri Amit Sahu, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of Indoor Plants on Human Health: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Isidro Alberto Pérez Bartolomé, University of Valladolid, Spain.

Reviewers:

(1) Deepak Kumar Namdeo, Computer Science College of Agriculture Balaghat, Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, India.

(2) Ibtihaj Abdulwahhab Abdulrazzak, Al-Iraqia University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.67/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Berna Krikor Jilenkerian, Syria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Deepak Kumar Namdeo, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ibtihaj Abdulwahhab Abdulrazzak, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Epigenetic Mechanisms of Metal Carcinogenicity: Exploring Associated Therapeutic Options for Individualised Treatments

Editor(s):

(1) Prof.  Ashish Anand, William Carey School of Osteopathic Medicine, Mississipi, USA and Associate Professor, Staff Orthopedic Surgeon GV Montgomery Va Medical Center, University of Mississipi Medical Center, Mississipi, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Mehrdad Hashemi, IAU, Iran.

(2) Anuja Atul Masule, Dr. Shivajirao Kadam College of Pharmacy, Shivaji University, India.

(3) Debosree  Ghosh, Govt. General Degree College, India.

(4) Archana Kumari, Guru Ghasidas Vishwavidyalaya, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.62/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mehrdad Hashemi, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anuja Atul Masule, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Debosree Ghosh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Archana Kumari, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Advances and Challenges in Intellectual Disability in Rural India: A Comprehensive Review of Recent Trends

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Gustavo Henrique Silva de Souza, Federal Institute of The North of Minas Gerais, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Abdul Karim Suhag, Sindh Madressatul Islam University, Pakistan.

(2) K. Vijaya Rachel, GITAM Deemed to be University, India.

(3) Digvijay Singh, Shri Balaji Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Abdul Karim Suhag, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (K.Vijaya Rachel, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Digvijay Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Behind Closed Doors: The Persistence of Domestic Violence in Contemporary Indian Society

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Meryem Altun Ekiz, Associate Professor, Hatay Mustafa Kemal University, Turkey.

(2) Dr. Der-Jang Chi, Chinese Culture University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Saket Bihari, Patna University, India.

(2) Ritu K. Sureka, University of Allahabad, India.

(3) Ebikabowei Musah, Government Model Secondary School, Nigeria.

(4) G. Theivanathan, Velammal Engineering College, India.

(5) Arpita Sharma Kandpal, GBPUA&T, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.04/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Saket Bihari, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ritu K. Sureka, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ebikabowei Musah, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (G. Theivanathan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_5 (Arpita Sharma Kandpal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA