Peer Review History: Factors Influence the Adoption of Improved Agricultural Practices among Smallholder Farmers in the Ripat Program: A Case of Morogoro Municipality, Tanzania

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rakesh Verma, Associate Professor, GNIOT MBA Institute, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Udit Maheshwari, IIMA, India.

(2) Juma Ismail, University of Dodoma, Tanzania.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Udit Maheshwari, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Juma Ismail, Tanzania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Corporate Governance and Manufacturing Firms’ Financial Performance in Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chun-Chien Kuo, National Taipei University of Business, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Ezeala George, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Nigeria.

(2) Emmanuel Uniamikogbo, Margaret Lawrence University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ezeala George, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Emmanuel Uniamikogbo, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Inhibition of Escherichia coli Cell-Free β-Galactosidase Activity by Binary Mixtures of Water-miscible Solvents

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Assistant Professor, Al-Quds Open University, Hebron Branch, Abu ktellah St., Hebron, Hebron, Palestine.

(2) Dr.  Fernando José Cebola Lidon, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Campus da Caparica, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Anmar Kamil Alalwani, University of Anbar, Iraq.

(2) Srisan Phupaboon, Khon Kaen University, Thailand.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Anmar Kamil Alalwani, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Srisan Phupaboon, Thailand) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: An Analysis of Marketing Status of BT Cotton Seed in Devbhumi Dwarka District, Gujarat, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Golubkina Nadezhda Alexandrovna, Federal Scientific Center of vegetable production, Russia.

(2) Dr. Golubkina Nadezhda Alexandrovna, Federal Scientific Center of vegetable production, Russia.

Reviewers:

(1) Sazzala Jeevananda Reddy, India.

(2) Garba Ibrahim Danmaidawo, Nigerian Institute for Oil-Palm Research (NIFOR), Nigeria.

(3) P. Bala Hussain Reddy, Acharya N G Ranga Agricultura University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sazzala Jeevananda Reddy, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Garba Ibrahim Danmaidawo, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (P. Bala Hussain Reddy, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Constraint Analysis and Suggestion of Respondents Regarding Dairy Management Practices in Semi-Urban and Rural Areas

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Md.Shajahan Kabir, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Bangladesh.

Reviewers:

(1) Bidyut Pritom Gogoi, ICAR- National Dairy Research Institute, India.

(2) Arjun Prasad Verma, Banda University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bidyut Pritom Gogoi, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Arjun Prasad Verma, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Scientometric Review of Research on Intestinal Dysbiosis in Dogs (2011–2023): Trends and Insights

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ravi Kant Chaturvedi, Center for Integrative Conservation & Yunnan Key Laboratory for Conservation of Tropical Rainforests & Asian Elephant, Chinese Academy of Sciences, P.R. China.

Reviewers:

(1) Habtamu Endale Tilahun, Wolaita Sodo University, Ethiopia.

(2) Arman Abdous, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

(3) Oumar Ouattara, University of Segou, Mali.

(4) Ravikumar Puttamallappa, Veterinary College, Karnataka Veterinary Animal & Fisheries Sciences University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.87/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Habtamu Endale Tilahun, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Arman Abdous, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Oumar Ouattara, Mali) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Ravikumar Puttamallappa, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Nutritional and Bioactive Properties of Composite Flour Made from Hempseed and Corn Silk for Formulation of Fibre and Protein Rich Paratha

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Uttara Singh, Assistant Professor, Govt. Home Science College, Panjab University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Shahid Mahmood, School of Food and Biological Engineering, Jiangsu University, China.

(2) Nikhil Digambar Solanke, Govt. College of Food Technology, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Agriculture University, India.

(3) Chandrahas Sahu, Dau Shri Vasudev Chandrakar Kamdhenu Vishwavidyalaya, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.84/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shahid Mahmood, China) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nikhil Digambar Solanke, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Chandrahas Sahu, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Gelatin, Chitosan, and Beeswax Based Edible Packaging for Food Product: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Nishant Kumar, National Institute of Food Technology Entrepreneurship and Management, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Niraj Kumar Prajapati, Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University, India.

(2) Chanda Chansa Thelma, Chreso University, Zambia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.35/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Niraj Kumar Prajapati, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Chanda Chansa Thelma, Zambia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Different PPI Herbicides on Energy Utilization, Nutrient Content and Uptake of Soybean (Glycine max L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ayona Jayadev, Assistant Professor, Research Center and Post Graduate, All Saints’ College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Mrutyunjay Padhiary, Assam University, India.

(2) S. Manibharathi, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.95/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mrutyunjay Padhiary, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (S. Manibharathi, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Successful Management of Cystitis in a Male Dog

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Sung-Kun Kim, Northeastern State University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Mohammad Elshahat Abd Alfatah, Egypt.

(2) Pankaj H. Chaudhary, P. R. Pote Patil College of Pharmacy, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mohammad Elshahat Abd Alfatah, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pankaj H. Chaudhary, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA