Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fabio da Costa Henry, Associate Professor, State University of Northern of Rio de Janeiro, UENF, Brasil.

Reviewers:

(1) Rajan Mishra, CVASc, GBPUA&T, India.

(2) Muhammad Qasim Ali, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rajan Mishra, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Muhammad Qasim Ali, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. S. M. Aqil Burney, University of Karachi, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Ibrahim, Suleman Adeniyi, Al-Hikmah University Ilorin, Nigeria.

(2) R. Amala, Indian Council of Medical Research – Vector Control Research Centre, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ibrahim, Suleman Adeniyi, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (R. Amala, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised MS v2 and Feedback v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Meryem Altun Ekiz, Associate Professor, Hatay Mustafa Kemal University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Imelda M. Flores, College of Teacher Education, Batangas State University, Philippines.

(2) Chris Gilbert, William VS Tubman University, Liberia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Imelda M. Flores, Philippines) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Chris Gilbert, Liberia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Syed A. A. Rizvi, College of Biomedical Sciences, Larkin University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Anguraj Moulishankar, SRM College of Pharmacy, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, India.

(2) Pooja A. Chawla, ISF College of Pharmacy, India.

(3) Ahmed S Ali, King Abdulaziz University, KSA.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Anguraj Moulishankar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pooja A. Chawla, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ahmed S Ali, KSA) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Stephen G Schwartz, Associate Professor, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Namrata Srivastava, ERA University of Allied Health Science, India.

(2) Salal Mohammad, Era University, India.

(3) Mainak Bhattacharyya, Eye Q Superspeciality Eye Hospital, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.34/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Namrata Srivastava, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Salal Mohammad, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mainak Bhattacharyya, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jurij Janež, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Reviewers:

(1) Fuat Polat, Dr. Siyami Ersek Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Turkey.

(2) Mohd Fazrin Mohd Rohani, Hospital Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Fuat Polat, Turkey) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mohd Fazrin Mohd Rohani, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Naseem A. Qureshi, Assistant Professor, Al-Falah University, India.

(2) Prof. Marcello Iriti, Milan State University, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Rahul Gogoi, Assam Agricultural University, India.

(2) Dhananjay Pandey, Govt. Naveen Girls College, India.

(3) Rizal Irfandi, Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia.

(4) John J. Georrge, University of North Bengal, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.62/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rahul Gogoi, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Dhananjay Pandey, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Rizal Irfandi, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (John J. Georrge, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Marco Trevisan, DiSTAS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Hasan Muminov, Chirchik State Pedagogical University, Uzbekistan.

(2) Gustavo Bich, National University of Misiones, Argentina.

(3) Samiran Patra, West Bengal University of Animal and Fishery Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.73/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hasan Muminov, Uzbekistan) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Gustavo Bich, Argentina) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Samiran Patra, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. M.V. Sriramachandrasekharan, Professor and Head, Annamalai University, India.

(2) Dr. Afroz Alam, Associate Professor, Banasthali Vidyapith, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Duddumpudi Venkata Sri Akshay, Acharya N G Ranga Agricultural University, India.

(2) Amandeep Ranjan, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Duddumpudi Venkata Sri Akshay, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Amandeep Ranjan, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chun-Chien Kuo, National Taipei University of Business, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Pankaj sahu, Dibrugarh University, India.

(2) Anushree Srivastava, Babu Banarasi Das University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Pankaj sahu, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anushree Srivastava, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA