Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Moaed Al Meselmani, The University of Sheffield, UK.

Reviewers:

(1) D Jayanarayana Reddy, G Pullaiah College of Engineering and Technology(Autonomus), India.

(2) Bangun Joko Laksono, Universitas Graha Karya Muara Bulian, Indonesia.

(3) R. Annie Sujatha, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (D Jayanarayana Reddy, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bangun Joko Laksono, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (R. Annie Sujatha, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Yong X. Gan, Associate Professor, California State Polytechnic University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Amirsalar Khandan, Amirkabir University of Technology, Iran.

(2) Gustavo Lopes Toledo, UNINOVE, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Amirsalar Khandan, Iran) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Gustavo Lopes Toledo, Brazil) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Shankar Srinivasan, Rutgers – School of Health Professions, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Sabira Sultana, Government College University, Pakistan.

(2) Keshamma E, Maharani Cluster University, India.

(3) Natarajan Sampathkumar, Ssm College of Arts and Science, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sabira Sultana, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Keshamma E, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Natarajan Sampathkumar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Janvier Gasana, Kuwait University, Kuwait.

Reviewers:

(1) Baisakhi Sarkar, The West Bengal University of Health Sciences, India.

(2) Grace Lalana Christophe, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Baisakhi Sarkar, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Grace Lalana Christophe, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fang Xiang, International Business School, University of International and Business Economics, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Allah Ditta, Federal Govt. Degree College for Women Multan Cantt, Times Institute Multan, Pakistan.

(2) Sunyapat Akkarajeerawat, Bangkok Christian College, Thailand.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Allah Ditta, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sunyapat Akkarajeerawat, Thailand) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Valarmathi, Scientist, ICAR- Central Institute for Cotton Research, Coimbatore, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Arlene Williams-Persad, The University of the West Indies, Trinidad and Tobago.

(2) Sheetal Kumawat, SKN College of Agriculture, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Arlene Williams-Persad, Trinidad and Tobago) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sheetal Kumawat, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Afroz Alam, Associate Professor, Banasthali Vidyapith, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Niloufar Rajaei, Univversity of Guilan, Iran.

(2) Georgi Kostadinov, Institute of Soil Science, Agrotechnologies and Plant Protection “Nikola Pushkarov”, Bulgaria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Niloufar Rajaei, Iran) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Georgi Kostadinov, Bulgaria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Langa Tembo, University of Zambia, Zambia.

Reviewers:

(1) Vinod Fogawat, CSIR- Indian Institute of Integrative Medicine, Jammu J&K, India.

(2) Jacob Pitii, University of Panama, Panama.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Vinod Fogawat, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jacob Pitii, Panama) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Afroz Alam, Associate Professor, Banasthali Vidyapith, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Yezli-Touiker Samira, Badji Mokhtar University, Algeria.

(2) Eric Robert, University of Orléans, France.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Yezli-Touiker Samira, Algeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Eric Robert, France) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Foluso O. Osunsanmi, University of Zululand, South Africa.

Reviewers:

(1) Fai Chan, USA.

(2) Vaibhav Mishra, UMH, India.

(3) Rafael Miranda Pedroso, Univerisdad De Ciencias Medicas Ernesto Guevara De La Serna, Cuba.

(4) Manjula, Bldeas Avs Amv, India.

(5) Pankaj Kumar Singh, Institute of Ayush Medical Sciences, Mahayogi Guru Gorakhnath Ayush University, India.

(6) Rashmi Sharma, Dr. Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan Rajasthan Ayurved University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Fai Chan, USA) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Vaibhav Mishra, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rafael Miranda Pedroso, Cuba) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Manjula, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pankaj Kumar Singh, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rashmi Sharma, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA