Peer Review History: Vaginal or Fecal Contamination Which Contributes to Parasite Existence in Urine Sediment

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rafik Karaman, Distinguished Professor, College of Pharmacy, Al-Quds University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Essam Fadel Alwan Al-Jumaili, Institute for Postgraduate Studies, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

(2) R. Rahmawati, University of Mataram, Indonesia.

(3) Margaret Mungai, Moi Teaching & Referral Hospital, Kenya.

(4) Zulay Margarita Palima Gonzalez, Univeridad Nacional Experimental Romulo Gallegos, Venezuela.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.62/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Essam Fadel Alwan Al-Jumaili, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (R. Rahmawati, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Margaret Mungai, Kenya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Zulay Margarita Palima Gonzalez, Venezuela) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effects of Different Plant Growth Regulators on Seed Germination, Seedling Growth and Establishment of Papaya (Carica papaya) Cv. Pusa Nanha

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Fernando José Cebola Lidon, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Campus da Caparica, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Cassia Rejane do Nascimento, Universidade Federal de Roraima, Brasil.

(2) Chairuddin, STMIK IM, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Cassia Rejane do Nascimento, Brasil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Chairuddin, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Climate Change and Global Agriculture: Addressing Challenges and Adaptation Strategies

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Bonface O. Manono, Extension Professor, Colorado State University, Office of Engagement and Extension, USA And Senior Lecturer, South Eastern Kenya University, Kenya.

(2) Dr. Mohamed Fadel, National Research Center, Egypt.

(3) Prof. Lixiang Cao, Sun Yat-sen University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Jyoti Pandey, India.

(2) Aniruddha Mukherjee, University of Engineering and Management, India.

(3) Domeniter Naomi Kathula, Management University of Africa, Kenya.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jyoti Pandey, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Aniruddha Mukherjee, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Domeniter Naomi Kathula, Kenya) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Enhancing Crop Saline Stress Tolerance and Soil Remediation with Phytobeneficial Bacteria: Diverse Approaches for Improvement

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Assistant Professor, Al-Quds Open University, Palestine

Reviewers:

(1) Hayder Abbood Kori, College of Administration and Economics, University of Thi – Qar, Iraq.

(2) Mohammed Naser Hussein, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hayder Abbood Kori, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mohammed Naser Hussein, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Mitigation of Mangrove Forest Destruction in East Kalimantan Province

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Nebi Bilir, Isparta University of Applied Sciences, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Andy Etta Bisong, School of Applied Sciences, Federal Polytechnic Ekowe, Nigeria.

(2) S M Nazmuz Sakib, School of Business and Trade, Switzerland.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Andy Etta Bisong, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (S M Nazmuz Sakib, Switzerland) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Possibility of Establishing an Iraqi University Business Incubator and Its Expected Impact on Entrepreneurship: An Analytical Study in a Sample of Iraqi Universities

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chun-Chien Kuo, National Taipei University of Business, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Itunuoluwa Adeoye, Elizabeth School of London, United Kingdom.

(1) Yana Priyana, Eastasouth Institute, Indonesia.

(2) Excel Chukwurah, United States.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Itunuoluwa Adeoye, United Kingdom) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Yana Priyana, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Excel Chukwurah, United States) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Genetic Diversity Analysis of Tomato Germplasm via RAPD Markers: A Case Study in Bangladesh

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Tsygankova Victoria Anatolyivna, Senior Staff Scientist & Principal Researcher, V.P. Kukhar Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry and Petrochemistry of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine.

Reviewers:

(1) Rizwana Zulfiqar, Institute of Botany, University of the Punjab, Pakistan.

(2) Thirunahari Ugandhar, Govt Degree College, Mahabubabad Kakatiya University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rizwana Zulfiqar, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Thirunahari Ugandhar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of Genetic Variability for Yield Improvement in Bitter Gourd (Momordica charantia L.) Genotypes

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hayder Ali Mohammed Al-Keraway, Assistant Professor, Veterinary Medicine College, University of Kerbala, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Fahmi Fuadah, Immanuel Health Institute, Indonesia.

(2) Oluwakemi Anike Ladipo, Babcock University Teaching Hospital, Nigeria.

(3) Sanyogita Shahi, Kalinga University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.63/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Fahmi Fuadah, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Oluwakemi Anike Ladipo, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sanyogita Shahi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Never Walk Alone: Clathrin-coated Vesicle (CCV) Components in Plant Immunity

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Lixiang Cao, Sun Yat-sen University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Zena M. Qaragholi, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

(2) Mukhtar Abdel Aziz Mohamed Osman, University of Dongola, Sudan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Zena M. Qaragholi, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mukhtar Abdel Aziz Mohamed Osman, Sudan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Detection and Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Candida Species Isolated from the Urine of Patients in a Tertiary Health Facility, Southwest Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rafik Karaman, Distinguished Professor, College of Pharmacy, Al-Quds University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Manikantan P, Christ University, India.

(2) Deepthi T, Sree Gokulam Medical College & Research Foundation, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Manikantan P, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Deepthi T, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA