Peer Review History: Integration of Customized Wheelchair Tracking and Durable Medical Equipment’s Solutions for Hospitals: A Continuous Quality Improvement Project

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Samir Kumar Bandyopadhyay, Academic Advisor, The Bhowanipur Education Society College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Jivan Rameshrao Kote, University of Kolhapur, India.

(2) Miguel Angel Amaró Garrido, University of Medical Sciences, Cuba.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Benjamin Valladares Carranza, Autonomous University of the State of Mexico, México.

(2) Priyanka Mayapur, AITD, IGNOU, Goa University, India.

(3) T.Nagendra Reddy, Sri Venkat4eswara Veterinary University, India.

(4) T.Rajini Samuel, Shri Sathya Sai Medical College and Research Institute, Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth Deemed To Be University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jivan Rameshrao Kote, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Miguel Angel Amaró Garrido, Cuba) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Geographic Accessibility of General Practitioners by Car and Public Transport – A Study Using the Minimum Travel Time Method in a Rural Area in the North-East of Germany

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sung-Kun Kim, Northeastern State University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) K. Raghu Babu, Yogi Vemana University, India.

(2) Arun Kumar Dwivedi, Sandip University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Vivek Naithani, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) AStanley Raj, Loyola College, India.

(2) Saeedeh Senemari, Imam Khomeini International University, Iran.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.2/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (K. Raghu Babu, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Arun Kumar Dwivedi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Oral Health Status of Pregnant Woman Versus Non-Pregnant Women of Childbearing Age (15-44 Years) in Lao PDR

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Abdelmonem Awad M. Hegazy, Zarqa University, Jordan.

Reviewers:

(1) Ammara Rafique, Indus University of Health Sciences, Pakistan.

(2) Namrata Dalal, India.

(3) Nuzulul Hikmah, Universitas Jember, Indonesia.

(4) Bilge Ersoz, Health Science University, Turkey.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Zouaoui.A, Abou Bekr Belkaid University, Algeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:3

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.13/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ammara Rafique, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Namrata Dalal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Nuzulul Hikmah, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Bilge Ersoz, Turkey) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Epidemiology of Small Ruminant External Parasites: In the Case of Chemical Control Campaign in Welkait District, Tigray Region, Ethiopia

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jean Beguinot, Research Associate, University of Bourgogne, France.

Reviewers:

(1) Beena V, Indian Veterinary Research Institute, India.

(2) David Msokwe, Tanzania Institute of Accountancy, Tanzania.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Danjuma Musa, National Eye Center, Nigeria.

(2) Edy Victor Haryanto S, Universitas Potensi Utama, Indonesia.

(3) Jianbin Li, Tianhua College, Shanghai Normal University, China.

(4) Joyce Siwila-Saasa, University of Zambia, Zambia.

(5) Reqgi First Trasia, Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Anwar Hussain, United States.

(2) Belaynesh Tazebew Flatie, Bahir Dar University, Ethiopia.

(3) Saba Fadhil Ali Malaa, Afurat Alawsat Technical University, Iraq.

(4) Sudarshana Borah Khanikor, University of Science and Technology, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Beena V, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (David Msokwe, Tanzania) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Journal change | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Sentiment Analysis by Hierarchical Deep Neural Networks for Audience Opinion Mining

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dariusz Jacek Jakóbczak, Assistant Professor, Koszalin University of Technology, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) P. Kalarani, Bharathiar University, India.

(2) Amrapali Prakash Tribhuvan, Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University, India.

(3) Senbagavalli M, Alliance University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Biplov Paneru, Pokhara University, Nepal.

(2) M. Edison, Loyola College (Autonomous), India.

(3) Ruchi Kaushal Sharma, NMIMS, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.67/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (P. Kalarani, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Amrapali Prakash Tribhuvan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Senbagavalli M, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Post Traumatic Diaphragmatic Hernia Diagnosed after 2 Years by a Complication of Intestinal Strangulation within the Chest

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Veera Muthumari, Assistant professor, V.V.Vanniaperumal College for Women, India.

Reviewers:

(1) G. Mannar Mannan, Apollo Cancer Hospital Chennai, India.

(2) Sherreen Yehia Zakaria Elhariri, International Medical University (IMU), Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Simone Giungato, “San Pio” Hospital, Italy.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Indrajit Anandakannan, Institute of General Surgery, Madras Medical College and Rajiv Gandhi Government General Hospital, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.45/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (G. Mannar Mannan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sherreen Yehia Zakaria Elhariri, Malaysia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Ileo-Ileal Intussusception Secondary to a Lipoma

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Davina Hijam, Associate professor, Regional Institute of Medical Sciences, Manipur, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Rodolfo Batista Castillo, Xarxa Santa Tecla Sanitaria, Social I Docent. Hospital del Vendrell, Spain.

(2) Abhay Narayan Kulkarni, Ayurved Seva Sangh’s Ayurved College Nashik, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.35/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rodolfo Batista Castillo, Spain) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Abhay Narayan Kulkarni, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Case Report on Diaphragmatic Hernia with Renal Ectopia as a Cause of Low Back Pain and Dyspnea

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Giuseppe Murdaca, Clinical Immunology Unit, University of Genoa, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Rajesh Kumar Mandal, Bheri Hospital, Nepal.

(2) Arun Naphe Khatri, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education & Research, India.

(3) Sudikshya KC, Nepalese Army Instituite of Health Sciences, Nepal.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Najeem Adedamola Idowu, Ladoke Akintola University of Technology, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Danial Fazilat-Panah, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

(2) Heamn Noori Abduljabbar, Universiti Putra Malaysia Upm, Malaysia.

(3) Nir Messer, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel -Aviv University, Israel.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rajesh Kumar Mandal, Nepal) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Arun Naphe Khatri, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sudikshya KC, Nepal) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Journal change | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Design and Implementation of a Standardised Clinical Decision Support Algorithm for Fever

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Sandeep Bhad, Rungta College of Engineering and Technology, India.

(2) Saumya Pandey, Indira IVF Hospital, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Jyotsna Pandit Khedkar, NES’s Gangamai College of Pharmacy, India.

(2) R.Narmadhagnanam, Government Arts College [Autonomous], Kumbakonam, India.

(3) Royyuru Srikanth, Vardhaman College of Engineering, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Aarthi E, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sandeep Bhad, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Saumya Pandey, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Artificial Intelligence in the Effective Execution Process of Construction Projects in the Future

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chun-Chien Kuo, National Taipei University of Business, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Samuel Humphrey Sam, Federal University Wukari, Nigeria.

(2) Kathirvel A, Panimalar Engineering College, Anna University, India.

(3) Julissa Elizabeth Reyna Gonzalez, School of Systems Engineering, Hermilio Valdizan National University, Peru.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ajay Kulkarni, Medi-Caps University, India.

(2) B. O. Orogbade, Olabisi Onabanjo University, Nigeria.

(3) Osabhie Paul Esangbedo, Nigeria.

(4) Jayakiran Reddy Esanakula, Sreenidhi Institute of Science and Technology, India.

(5) Kirti Sharma, Vivekananda Institute of Professional Studies, India.

(6) M. S. Harne, Savitribai Phule Pune University, India.

(7) Muhammad Mubeen, Mehran University of Engineering and Technology, Pakistan.

(8) Osama Burak Elhalid, Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, Turkey.

(9) Purva Mujumdar, Sushant University, India.

(10) V.Swamy Nadh, Aditya College of Engineering, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1)  K. Anupama Francy, Vishnu Institute of Technology, India.

(2)  Mabrouka Shahat Younis Elfargani, University of Derna, Libya.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Samuel Humphrey Sam, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kathirvel A, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Julissa Elizabeth Reyna Gonzalez, Peru) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA