Peer Review History: Assessment of Micronutrient Deficiencies in Agricultural Soils of Hasanganj and Auras Blocks, Unnao District, Uttar Pradesh, India: Implications for Sustainable Farming

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohamed Fadel, National Research Center, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Mrinal Choudhury, SCS College of Agriculture, Assam Agricultural University, India.

(2) Ajeet Kumar, College of Basic Sciences and Humanities (CBS&H), Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

 

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mrinal Choudhury, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ajeet Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Studies on Management Practices on Growth, Development, Tillage and NPK Content of Soybean (Glycine max L.) in the North Western Himalayas

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mariusz Cycoń, Medical University of Silesia, Poland.

(2) Prof. Lixiang Cao, Sun Yat-sen University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Mrinal Choudhury, Assam Agricultural University, India.

(2) Naziya Banu, University Of Mysore, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mrinal Choudhury, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Naziya Banu, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Enriched Farm Yard Manure on Growth and Yield of Sweet Corn (Zea mays var. Saccharata)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Lixiang Cao, Sun Yat-sen University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Anil Kumar Yadav, India.

(2) Anita Mahapatra, College of Agriculture, Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.15/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

 

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Anil Kumar Yadav, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anita Mahapatra, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of Integrated Interventions of Prescriber Education and De-escalation Strategies on Implementing WHO Access: Insights from a South Indian Tertiary Care Setting

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Biswajit Dash, Amity Institute of Pharmacy, Amity University, Kolkata, India, Adamas University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Rakibul Hasan, University of Louisville, United States.

(2) Norshazlin Binti Md Zawawi, Shah Alam Hospital, Malaysia.

(3) Manasa C R, RGUHS, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.50/10

 

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rakibul Hasan, United States) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Norshazlin Binti Md Zawawi, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Manasa C R, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Germination, Drying, Milling and Sieving on the Nutritional Quality of Foxtail Millet (Setaria italica)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Tsygankova Victoria Anatolyivna, Senior Staff Scientist & Principal Researcher, Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry and Petrochemistry, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine.

Reviewers:

(1) Manasa R, University of Mysore, India.

(2) Jaya Laxman Jamdar, CNCVCW, CSIBER, India.

(3) Robijaona Rahelivololoniaina Baholy, University of Antananarivo, Madagascar.

(4) Debjani Das, Professor Jayashankar Telangana Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

 

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Manasa R, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jaya Laxman Jamdar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Robijaona Rahelivololoniaina Baholy, Madagascar) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Debjani Das, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Enhancing Agricultural Resilience Through Seed Priming: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohammed Jard Kadhim, Assistant Professor, Al- Furat Al- Awsat Technical University, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Aashish Gyawali, Institute of Agriculture and Animal Sciences, Tribhuvan University, Nepal

(2) Suleman Haider Shah, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

 

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Aashish Gyawali, Nepal) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Suleman Haider Shah, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Pharmacokinetics of Enrofloxacin in Rohu (Labeo rohita): A Comparison of Bath, Intramuscular, and Oral Administration

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iram Liaqat, Associate Professor, Govt. College University, Lahore, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Igor, Ukraine.

(2) Halina Tkaczenko, Institute of Biology, Pomeranian University in Słupsk, Poland.

(3) Esti Handayani Hardi, Mulawarman University Jl., Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

 

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Igor, Ukraine) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Halina Tkaczenko, Poland) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Esti Handayani Hardi, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Potential of Insect Gut Microbes in Advancing Renewable Energy Production: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohammed Jard Kadhim, Assistant Professor, Al- Furat Al- Awsat Technical University, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Sollomy Ainomujuni, Uganda Institute of Information and Communications Technology, Uganda.

(2) Aremanda Ramesh Babu, Mainefi College of Engineering & Technology (MCET), India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

 

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sollomy Ainomujuni, Uganda) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Aremanda Ramesh Babu, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Factors of Staphylococcus aureus in Dairy Farms: Insights from the Animal-Human-Environment Interface

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohammed Jard Kadhim, Assistant Professor, Al- Furat Al- Awsat Technical University, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Anushri Tiwari, N.D.V.S.U., India.

(2) Gizem Ozluk, Hitit University, Turkey.

(3) S. Ilavarasan, Indian Veterinary Research Institute, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

 

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Anushri Tiwari, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Gizem Ozluk, Turkey) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (S. Ilavarasan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Genetic Analysis of Line × Tester Crosses of Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) for Combining Ability Variances and Effect

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Tsygankova Victoria Anatolyivna, Senior Staff Scientist & Principal researcher, Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry and Petrochemistry, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine.

Reviewers:

(1) Alireza Haghighi Hasanalideh, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Iran.

(2) Tejaskumar H. Borkhatariya, College of Agriculture, Junagadh Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Alireza Haghighi Hasanalideh, Iran) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Tejaskumar H. Borkhatariya, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA