Peer Review History: Gross Anatomical Studies on Facial Bones of the Skull of Indian Mongoose (Herpestes javanicus)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iram Liaqat, Associate Professor, Govt. College University, Lahore, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Asli Salcioğlu, Turkey.

(2) Hiroki Higashiyama, SOKENDAI: The Graduate University for Advanced Studies, Japan.

(3) Érika Branco, Universidade Federal Rural da Amazônia – UFRA, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Elias Warshaw, University of Bristol, United Kingdom.

(2) Ibrahem Abdulrasol, Al-Muthanna University, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Asli Salcioğlu, Turkey) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hiroki Higashiyama, Japan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Érika Branco, Brazil) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Standardization of Cost-effective Nursery Techniques in Marigold

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Tsygankova Victoria Anatolyivna, Senior Staff Scientist & Principal researcher,V.P. Kukhar Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry and Petrochemistry of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine.

Reviewers:

(1) Du jie, Huainan Normal University, China.

(2) Olagunju Johnson Adetuwo, Adekunle Ajasin University Akungba-Akoko, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Jinisha Blessie JP, Kerala Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Du jie, China) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Olagunju Johnson Adetuwo, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effectiveness of Soil-amended Biochar in Improving Crop Production, Soil Health and Environmental Aspects

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jean Beguinot, Research Associate, University of Bourgogne, France.

Reviewers:

(1) Mohamed El-Komi, National Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries, Egypt.

(2) Khadeeja Ahmed Sido, University of Duhok, College of Agriculture and Engineering Sciences, Iraq.

(3) Rajya Lakshmi, Beaconhouse International College, Canada.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Endalkachew Baye, Salale University, Ethiopia.

(2) Faithful Ivbarue Oshone, Ekiti State University, Nigeria.

(3) Isreal Ayobami Onifade, Federal University of Technology Akure, Nigeria.

(4) James Majamanda, Domasi College of Education, University of Malawi, Malawi.

(5) Mahmoud Okasha, Agricultural Research Center, Egypt.

(6) Maria Belem Arce Vazquez, México.

(7) Naseema Rahman, Assam Agricultural University-HRS, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Amer J. A. Al-Gerrawy, Wasit University, Iraq.

(2) Asoke Kumar Sannigrahi, Advanced Management Institute for Training and Achievement, India.

(3) João Rufino de Freitas Filho, Rural Federal University of Pernambuco (UFRPE), Brazil.

(4) Jolanta Puczel, International Academy of Applied Sciences in Łomży, Poland.

(5) Mahmoud Saad Abdelzaher Zedan, French University in Cairo, Egypt.

(6) Mallu Srinivasa Reddy, Acharya N.G.Ranga Agricultural University, India.

(7) T.Kumaran, Muslim Arts College, India.

(8) Nur Qursyna Boll Kassim, Universiti Teknologi Mara, Malaysia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.23/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mohamed El-Komi, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Khadeeja Ahmed Sido, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Rajya Lakshmi , Canada) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Studies on the Persistence of Pyraclostrobin 10% CS in Acidic, Neutral and Basic Waters by Validated HPLC-DAD Method

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Figen Balo, Firat University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Ljiljana Nikolić Bujanović, Union Nikola Tesla, Serbia.

(2) Chukwu Fidelis, Imo State University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.35/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ljiljana Nikolić Bujanović, Serbia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Chukwu Fidelis, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Effect of Purwoceng Extract on the Etawa Crossbreed Bucks Mating

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Muhammad Zubair, Associate Professor, University of Poonch, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Shahid Ahmad Shergojry, Sheri-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, India.

(2) Matei Adrian Ducu, Athenaeum University, Romania.

(3) Nakambam Manoranjan Singh, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Suntorn  Wittayakun, Rajamangala University of Technology Lanna, Thailand.

(2) Rukmani Dewangan, College of Veterinary Science & A. H., Anjora, Durg (Chhattisgarh), India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Matysyagandha Kishanrao Patil, COVAS, MAFSU, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.93/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shahid Ahmad Shergojry, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Matei Adrian Ducu, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Nakambam Manoranjan Singh, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Review on Precision Agriculture Navigating the Future of Farming with AI and IoT

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Faisal, Lecturer, Sohar University, Oman.

(2) Prof. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Mustafa Bin Dakian, Graduate School of Business, Universiti Tun Abdul Razak, Malaysia.

(2) Mojtaba Sedighi, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

(3) Isaac Baidoo, Biotechnology and Nuclear Agriculture Research Institute, Ghana.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Parveen Kumar, SKUAST-Jammu, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Ahmed Awad Talb Altalb, University of Mosul, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mustafa Bin Dakian, Malaysia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mojtaba Sedighi, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Isaac Baidoo, Ghana) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Journal_Change | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparative Evaluation of Surface Roughness Using Two Different Mechanical Surface Treatments and their Effect on Microshear Bond Strength Using Different Nanocomposites: An In vitro Sem Study

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Joao Paulo Schwartz, School of Dentistry of Amazonas, Federal University (FAO-UFAM), Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) John Alexis Dominguez, Universidad Peuana Cayetano Heredia, Peru.

(2) U. Krishna Kumar, RGUHS, India.

(3) Tarun Kumar Singh, AIIMS, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Florence Wanja Ngari, The Technical University of Kenya, Kenya.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Dina Maleki, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

(2) Joby Peter, Annoor Dental College and Hospital, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (John Alexis Dominguez, Peru) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (U. Krishna Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Tarun Kumar Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Endoscopic Extraction of Foreign Bodies from the Upper Digestive Tract in Adults: A Case Series

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Veera Muthumari, Assistant professor, V.V.Vanniaperumal College for Women, Virudhunagar, Tamil Nanu, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Mohammed Ahmed El-Gelany Azab, Cairo University Kasr Alainy School of Medicine, Egypt.

(2) Nandini Manndath, University of Bahrain, Bahrain.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Hussein Soleimantabar, Shahid Beheshti Medical University (SBMU), Iran.

(2) Mariana Nuno Costa, Portugal.

(3) Rahul Pal, Nims Institute of Pharmacy, Nims University Rajasthan, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mohammed Ahmed El-Gelany Azab, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nandini Manndath, Bahrain) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Design of an All-in-One Drowning Prevention and Monitoring System

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Guang Yih Sheu, Associate Professor, Chang-Jung Christian University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Md Moyeed Abrar, Khaja Bandanawaz University, India.

(2) Vojin Grković, University of Novi Sad, Serbia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Pankaj Balasaheb Gavali, Rajarambapu Institute of Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Ameer Aqeel Kamoona, Al Furat AL Wast Technical University, Babylon Technical Institute, Iraq.

(2) C.Bibin, R.M.K. College of Engineering and Technology, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.45/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Md Moyeed Abrar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Vojin Grković, Serbia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Securing the Digital Frontier: Strategies for Cloud Computing Security, Database Protection, and Comprehensive Penetration Testing

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Leandro A. Pasa, Campus Medianeira da Universidade Tecnologica Federal do Parana, Brazil.

(2) Dr. Guang Yih Sheu, Associate Professor, Chang-Jung Christian University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Sohil Shah, Gujarat Technological University, India.

(2) T N Kavitha, SCSVMV, India.

(3) Jalaiah Saikam, School of Computer Science and Engineering, Vit-Ap University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Asmaa Salih Hammoodi, Tikrit University.

(2) Gagandeep, Chitkara University, India.

(3) Harshal Shah, Parul University, India.

(4) K. Kumutha, Tagore College of Arts And Science, India.

(5) Mohan Kumar Dehury, Amity University Jharkhand, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Jyoti Batra Arora, Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sohil Shah, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (T N Kavitha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Jalaiah Saikam, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA