Peer Review History: Determinant of Eudaimonic Well Being: Case in Mimika Papua, Indonesia

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chun-Chien Kuo, National Taipei University of Business, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Dorothy Medza Tsuma, Management University of Africa, Kenya.

(2) Tefo Gordon Sekgweleo, Eskom South Africa, South Africa.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mohammed Nabeel K, Bharathiar University, India.

(2) Ranpreet Kaur, India.

(3) Rinki Mishra, Parul University, India.

(4) Robert Arasa, Machakos University, Kenya.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Sameeena Z. Mir, Ajeenkya DY Patil University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Dorothy Medza Tsuma, Kenya) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Tefo Gordon Sekgweleo, South Africa) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Shree Anna: The Nutritional Powerhouse Paving the Path for Health Security in India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Marco Trevisan, DiSTAS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Saroj Kumar Prasad, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, India.

(2) Maria M. Adeyemi, Caleb University, Nigeria.

(3) Guan, Yan’an, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Science, China.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ancha Singh, Jai Prakash University Chapra Bihar, India.

(2) Radhika.R, Pondicherry University, India.

(3) Taiwo Oluwatoyin Ajao, Nigerian Stored Products Research Institute, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Saroj Kumar Prasad, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Maria M. Adeyemi, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Guan, Yan’an, China) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of the Mutagenic Potential of Artavol® Using the Ame’s Test

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Prem K. Ramasamy, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, USA.

(2) Prof. Marcello Iriti, Milan State University, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Pradeep Bodduluri, Kravy Pharma Institute, India.

(2) Asha S Raj, Institute of Teaching and Research in Ayurveda, India.

(3) Alpana Joshi, Shobhit Institute of Engineering & Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Adakole Boniface Ella, Nigeria.

(2) Babita Yadav, India.

(3) Mohd Shahid, Mohd Shahid.

(4) S. Anuradha, University College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kakatiya University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) M. Jeyachandran, Sri Paramakalyani College, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Pradeep Bodduluri, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Asha S Raj, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Alpana Joshi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Anaemia in Relationship with Body Mass Index among Adult Female Students in Tertiary Institution

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Armel Hervé Nwabo Kamdje, Assistant Professor, University of Ngaoundere, Cameroon.

Reviewers:

(1) Sheeba Varghese, Royal Dental College, India.

(2) Ch K  V L S N Anjana Male, Nims Institute of Pharmacy, Nims College of Pharmacy, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Chinwe Okeke, Federal College of Veterinary and Medical Laboratory Technology Vom, Nigeria.

(2) Vasukidevi Ramachandran, Bharath Institute of Higher Education and Research, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Bonaventure Tientche, University of Buea, Cameroon.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sheeba Varghese, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ch K V L S N Anjana Male, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Study on the Germicidal Effect of Bitter Bark Tree (Sacoglottis gabonensis) on Water Purification

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Elmarie Van Der Watt, University of the Free State, South Africa.

(2) Prof. Prasong Srihanam, Mahasarakham University, Thailand.

(3) Prof. Mohamed Fawzy Ramadan Hassanien, Zagazig University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Wubetu Yihunie, Debre Markos University, Ethiopia.

(2) Aneela Sharif, University of Mianwali, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Wubetu Yihunie, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Aneela Sharif, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Novel Graphitic Carbon Nitride/Co-B-P Nanocomposites with Significantly Enhance Visible-Light Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production from Water Splitting

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Francisco Marquez-Linares, School of Science and Technology, Universidad Ana G. Méndez-Gurabo Campus, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Olawale Monsur Sanusi, INSA Centre Val de Loire, France.

(2) Swapnakumari B. Patil, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Balaso D.Jadhav, Rayat Shikshan Sanstha’s Sharadchandra Pawar Mahavidyalaya, India.

(2) Ganesh Kadiyala, India.

(3) Laftani Yasmine, Graduate School of Technology, Cadi Ayyad University, Morocco.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.95/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Olawale Monsur Sanusi, France) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Swapnakumari B. Patil, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Characterization and Identification of Major Constraints and Potentials of Kiltu Sorsa Watershed, in Guji Zone, Southern Ethiopia

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Chandra Shekhar Kapoor, Assistant Professor, Raj Noble Degree College, Govind Guru Tribal University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Samane Arvandi, Soil Conservation and Watershed Management Research Institute, Iran.

(2) Neelam Yadav, CSJMU, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Shraddha Pandey, Guru Ghasidas University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Samane Arvandi, Iran) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Neelam Yadav, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Physical Consequences of Climate Change on Agriculture: Causes and Effects

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Marco Trevisan, DiSTAS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Muhammad Ijaz Tabassum, Wheat Research Institute, Pakistan.

(2) Yongqi Wang, College of Tobacco, Henan Agricultural University, China.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Nnaemeka Success Esiobu, International Rice Research Institute (IRRI), Thailand.

(2) Okpo Francis Uzochukwu, Nwafor Orizu College of Education, Nigeria.

(3) Sopialena, University of Mulawarman, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Muhammad Ijaz Tabassum, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Yongqi Wang, China) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Factors Determining Private Agricultural Investment: A Comparative Case Study of Two States of India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chun-Chien Kuo, National Taipei University of Business, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Sabah Mahmoud Mahran, King Abdulaziz University, Saudi Arabia.

(2) Alamsyah Agit, DDI Islamic Institute of Sidenreng Rappang, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sabah Mahmoud Mahran, Saudi Arabia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Alamsyah Agit, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Understanding the Nigerian Domestic Debt

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Alexandru Trifu, Z“Petre Andrei” University of Iasi, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Naftaly Mose, University of Eldoret, Kenya.

(2) Chandrakala. M, Kristu Jayanti College, India.

(3) Kurpayanidi K.I, Fergana Polytechnic Institute, Uzbekistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Danish Baig, University of Sargodha, Pakistan.

(2) Sojib Bhawmick, Dhaka International University, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Zunarni Kosim, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Naftaly Mose, Kenya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Chandrakala. M, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Kurpayanidi K.I., Uzbekistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA