Peer Review History: Mechanization Levels of Some Crops in the Gezira Scheme, Sudan

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hamid El Bilali, International Centre for Advanced Mediterranean Agronomic Studies, Mediterranean Agronomic Institute of Bari (CIHEAM-Bari), Valenzano (Bari), Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Rathinavel S, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

(2) Alireza Allameh, Rice Research Institute of Iran, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Syful Islam, Bangladesh Institute of Nuclear Agriculture (BINA), Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rathinavel S, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Alireza Allameh, Iran) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: ICH and E-Commerce: Bridging Tradition and Modernity in Cultural and Creative Products

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chun-Chien Kuo, National Taipei University of Business, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Prashant S. Kalshetti, Global Business School & Research Centre, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, India.

(2) Roberto Paladini, Ca’ Foscari University of Venice, Italy.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Prashant S. Kalshetti, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Roberto Paladini, Italy) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparative Reliability Analysis of Selenium and Playwright: Evaluating Automated Software Testing Tools

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Francisco Welington de Sousa Lima, Federal University of Piaui,Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Kodanda Rami Reddy Manukonda, IBM, USA.

(2) S. Suguna Mallika, CVR College of Engineering, India.

(3) JPD Wijesekara, NSBM Green University, Sri Lanka.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kodanda Rami Reddy Manukonda, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (S. Suguna Mallika, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (JPD Wijesekara, Sri Lanka) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Determinants of Human Development Index (HDI): A Regression Analysis of Economic and Social Indicators

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Fang Xiang, Visiting Professor, University of International and Business Economics, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Salaheddine SARI-HASSOUN, University Centre of Maghnia, Algeria.

(2) Nicholas Bamegne Nambie, Valley View University-Ghana, Ghana.

(3) Fashanu Felix Adeniyi, McPherson University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Adamu Mulu Ketema, Salale University College of Business and Economics, Ethiopia.

(2) Ofori Frimpong Henneh, Knutsford University College, Ghana.

(3) Onyechege Declan Chibueze, University Putra, Malaysia.

(4) Paulinus Okhumode Ozemede, Bayero University, Nigeria.

(5) Solomon Audu, Caleb University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.83

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Salaheddine SARI-HASSOUN, Algeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nicholas Bamegne Nambie, Ghana) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Fashanu Felix Adeniyi, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparison of Patients’ Perceptions of Safety and Efficacy of Herbal and Conventional Type 2 Diabetes Treatments in Nairobi, Kenya

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Erich Cosmi, University of Padua School of Medicine, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Philip lartey, Eastern regional hospital, Ghana.

(2) Shubham Singh, Rai University, India.

(3) S.P. Chaudhary, BHU, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

 

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Philip lartey, Ghana) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shubham Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (S.P. Chaudhary, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Product Packaging on Consumer Buying Behavior: An Econometric Case Study of Jambo Drinking Water, Nyegezi Ward, Mwanza City, Tanzania

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Gerald Aranoff, Ariel University, Israel.

Reviewers:

(1) Karthik Reddy, Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology, India.

(2) Hirenkumar Mistry, Grand Canyon University, USA.

(3) Narsis I, Bharathidasan University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Joy Ndidiamaka Okafor, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

 

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Karthik Reddy, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hirenkumar Mistry, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Narsis I, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Bioreactor-based Bioremediation of Degreaser-Contaminated Soil: A Study on Microbial Synergy and Nutrient Amendments

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Claudia Coelho, Assistant Professor, University of Tras-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Asmaa Abdul Hassan Abdul Hai, University of Basrah, Iraq

(2)Aseel Nadhim Al-Salman, University of Basrah, Iraq

(3) Madhavi Pandey, Shri Rawatpura Sarkar University, India

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Asmaa Abdul Hassan Abdul Hai, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Aseel Nadhim Al-Salman, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Madhavi Pandey, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Screening of Potato Varieties/Entries Against Common Scab (Streptomyces scabiei) of Potato

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Khairy Abdel-Maksoud Mohamed Abada, Cairo University, Egypt

(2) Munawar Fazal, College of Commerce, Arts & Science, India

 

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.55/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Khairy Abdel-Maksoud Mohamed Abada, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Munawar Fazal, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Irrigation, Tillage and Residue Retention on Performance and Economics of Soybean–Wheat Cropping System

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iqtidar Hussain, Assistant Professor, Gomal University, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Firdoz Shahana, PJTAU, India

(2) Ghassan Jayed Zaidan, College of Agriculture, Tikrit University, Iraq

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

 

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Firdoz Shahana, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ghassan Jayed Zaidan, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA