Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Emeritus Ahmed Medhat Mohamed Al-Naggar, Cairo University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Chadetrik Rout, Maharishi Markandeshwar Deemed to be University, India.

(2) Mihaela Lungu, National Research and Development Institute for soil Science, Agrochemistry and Environment, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Nihad Abdul-Lateef Ali Kadhim, Al -Qasim Green University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.05/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Chadetrik Rout, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mihaela Lungu, Romania) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Veronica Mîndrescu, Associate Professor, Transilvania University of Brasov, Romania.

(2) Tsung Hung Lee,  Professor, Graduate School of Leisure and Exercise Studies, National Yunlin University of Science & Technology, Taiwan.

(3) Prof. Turgut Tursoy, Near East University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Naomi Nduta Njoroge, Nairobi University, Kenya.

(2) Mohammad Fotouhi Ardakani, Ardakan University, Iran.

(3) Noor Azlinna Azizan, Solbridge International School of Business, South Korea.

(4) Rahul Banerjee, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute, India.

(5) Endang Noerhartati, Universitas Wijaya Kusuma Surabaya, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ahmad Azmy, Tanri Abeng University, Indonesia.

(2) Kalulu Ronald, Mountains of the Moon University, Uganda.

(3) M. Abdul Jamal, University of Madras, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Ayuta Mohanty, C. V. Raman Global University, India.

(2) Somashekhar I C, Vidyavardhaka College of Engineering, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Naomi Nduta Njoroge, Kenya) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mohammad Fotouhi Ardakani, Iran) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Noor Azlinna Azizan, South Korea) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Rahul Banerjee, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_5 (Endang Noerhartati, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Journal_Change | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Özlem Sultan Aslantürk, Associate Professor, Adnan Menderes University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Ai Tran Huu, Van Hien University, Vietnam.

(2) Yusuf Izang Elijah, University of Jos, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Jose Manuel Salum Tome, Universidad Catolica de Temuco, Chile.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Sangeet Ranguwal, PAU, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.65/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ai Tran Huu, Vietnam) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Yusuf Izang Elijah, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ashish Anand, William Carey School of Osteopathic Medicine, Mississipi, USA and Associate Professor, Staff Orthopedic Surgeon GV Montgomery Va Medical Center, University of Mississipi Medical Center, Mississipi, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Bhavya B. M, Central Ayurveda Research Institute, India.

(2) Marco A. Ramirez-Ortiz, Hospital Infantil De México Federico Gómez, Mexico.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) K Edvina Princy, SRM Trichy College of Nursing, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bhavya B. M., India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Marco A. Ramirez-Ortiz, Mexico) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Kamal Kant, Assistant Professor, Aspee Shakilam Biotechnology Institute, Navsari Agricultural University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Shaikh Salahuddin Shaikh Rafiuddin, College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, MAFSU, India.

(2) Amira Soliman, Agricultural Research Center, Animal Production Research Institute, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Ali Ahmed Abdukareem, University of Thi Qar, Iraq.

(2) Anum Razzaq, PMAS-Arid Agriculture University, Pakistan.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shaikh Salahuddin Shaikh Rafiuddin, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Amira Soliman, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Francisco Welington de Sousa Lima, Natural Sciences Center, Federal University of Piaui, Brazil, Minister Petrônio Portella University Campus, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Ananth S. Iyengar, M.S. Ramaiah University of Applied Sciences, India.

(2) Babatunde Abiodun Joseph, University of Ilorin, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Muhammad Syaiful Fadly A. Majid, Tadulako University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.55/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ananth S. Iyengar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Babatunde Abiodun Joseph, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Orlando Manuel da Costa Gomes, Lisbon Accounting and Business School (ISCAL), Lisbon Polytechnic Institute, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Farhang Salehi, Iran.

(2) Sonali Bhutad, Mumbai University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abhishek Kumar, India.

(2) Onwudebelu Ugochukwu, Alex Ekwueme Federal University Ndufu Alike Ikwo, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Rajamohan Parthasarathy, SEGI University, Malaysia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Farhang Salehi, Iran) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sonali Bhutad, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Pradip K Bhowmik, University of Nevada Las Vegas, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Souilah Zahi, CDTA, Algeria.

(2) Tejinder Kaur, UIPS, Chandigarh University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Rana Das, University of Missouri, USA.

(2) Tahrir Etihad Kadium, Alkindy College of Medicine, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Souilah Zahi, Algeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Tejinder Kaur, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Khalid Khalidlawan, Nigeria Police Academy, Nigeria.

(2) Manikantan P, Christ University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Fayez M Eissa, Aswan University, Egypt.

(2) Meraim Attyah Kazaal, Technical Institute of Al-Diwaniyah, Al-Furat Al- Awsat Technical University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Sayyed-Javad Ziaolhagh, Iran.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Khalid Khalidlawan, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Manikantan P, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Arulselvan Palanisamy, Visiting Professor, School of Bio-Engineering, Centre for Materials Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, Bharath Institute of Higher Education and Research, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Bharti Sahu, Seth Phool Chand Agrawal Smriti College, India.

(2) Sargol Mazraedoost, Pukyong National University, South Korea.

(3) Manisha V. Kale, Shivaji University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Naveen, Rajmata Vijayaraje Scindia Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, India.

(2) Shyma K.P., Bihar Animal Sciences University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bharti Sahu, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sargol Mazraedoost, South Korea) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Manisha V. Kale, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA