Peer Review History: Spectral Analysis of Pink Mealy Bug Damaged Mulberry Plants Using Hyperspectral Radiometry

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chung-Jen Chiang, School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Bashir Barau, Federal College of Agricultural Produce Technology, Nigeria.

(2) Nor Hairul Bin Palal, PoliteknikTun Syed Nasir Syed Ismail, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) B.Geetha, TamilNadu Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.55/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bashir Barau, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nor Hairul Bin Palal, Malaysia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Commercial Culture of Cordyceps militaris from Waste Products of Sericulture in India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Assistant Professor, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Jitendra Malviya, Institute of Advance Bioinformatics, India.

(2) Shambhavi H T, College of Agriculture, Gandhi Krishi Vigyana Kendra, University of Agricultural Sciences, India.

(3) Rebah N. Algafari, Al-Nahrain University, Iraq.

(4) Ooi Der Jiun, Mahsa University, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jitendra Malviya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shambhavi H T, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Rebah N. Algafari, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Ooi Der Jiun, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Role of Different Fertilization on Growth, Yield and Quality Evaluation in Maize (Zea mays L.) and Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) Intercropping

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Fernando José Cebola Lidon, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Campus da Caparica, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Itefa Degefa Alemu, Dambi Dollo University, Ethiopia.

(2) Bashir Barau, Federal College of Agricultural Produce Technology, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Doumbia Khady, University Nangui Abrogoua, Côte D’ivoire.

(2) Emmanuel Chikalipa, The University of Zambia, Zambia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Itefa Degefa Alemu, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bashir Barau, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of Advance Generation Breeding Lines of Bitter Gourd for Yield and Quality Traits

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Assistant Professor, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Digvijay, School of Applied and Life Sciences, Uttaranchal University, India.

(2) Christopher G. Geranta, Central Luzon State University, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Chandan Shreevastav, Tribhuvan University, Nepal.

(2) Hafiza Ayesha Andleeb, The University of Lahore, Pakistan.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Digvijay, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Christopher G. Geranta, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: An Assessment of the Nutritional Status and its Predictors amongst Women in a Rural Community of Dharwad Taluk, Karnataka, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hudson Nyambaka, Kenyatta University, Nairobi, Kenya.

Reviewers:

(1) Susmita Sarmin, Hajee Mohammad Danesh Science and Technology University, Bangladesh.

(2) Lawal Abdulwahab, University of Ilorin Teaching Hospital, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Erika Agung Mulyaningsih, STIKES Pemkab Jombang, Indonesia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Susmita Sarmin, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Lawal Abdulwahab, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Investigation of the Multidrug Resistance Pattern of Bacteria Isolated from Car and Office Door Handles in a Tertiary Institution

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. John Yahya I. Elshimali, UCLA School of Medicine, Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Rafia Rahman, Institute of Health Economics, University of Dhaka, Bangladesh.

(2) B. Kanimozhi, Dr. NGP Arts and Science College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Santy Irene Putri, Tribhuwana Tunggadewi University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Ali Aboud Shareef, University of Basrah, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rafia Rahman, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (B. Kanimozhi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effects of Watermelon Juice on the Haematological Indices and Body Mass Index of Male Wistar Rats

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Juan Carlos Troiano, University of Buenod Aires, Argentina.

Reviewers:

(1) Gauri Shrikrishna Metkar, MUHS, Nashik University, India.

(2) Chinmoyee Baruah Hazra, The Neotia University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Gauri Shrikrishna Metkar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Chinmoyee Baruah Hazra, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparative Evaluation of the Effect of DTT Treatment and Heat Inactivation on ABO Isoagglutinin Titers

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hayder Ali Mohammed Al-Keraway, Assistant Professor, Veterinary Medicine College, University of Kerbala, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Generalov Sergei Viacheslavovich, Fеdегаl State Scientific Institution “Russian Research Anti Рlаguе Institute, Russia.

(2) Sada Jasimabdulameer, College of Education for Pure Sciences, Wasit University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mostafa Abbas Shalaby, Cairo University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Generalov Sergei Viacheslavovich, Russia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sada Jasimabdulameer, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of Land Use and Land Cover Changes on Ecosystem Services Value in Mwanza City, Tanzania

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ravi Kant Chaturvedi, Center for Integrative Conservation, Yunnan Key Laboratory for Conservation of Tropical Rainforests & Asian Elephant, Chinese Academy of Sciences, P.R. China.

Reviewers:

(1) Sanjeev Goel, Rajiv Gandhi Govt. P.G. College, India.

(2) Victor M Ordriguez Moreno, INIFAP, Mexico.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sanjeev Goel, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Victor M Ordriguez Moreno, Mexico) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Knowledge and Attitude of Eye Care Workers towards Electronic Medical Records in a Tertiary Eye Facility in South-East Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Charbell Miguel Haddad Kury, University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Vahid Ranaei, School of Health, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

(2) Sarah Iqbal, Dhofar University, Oman.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Heeral Joshi, Pawan Multispeciality Hospital and Telemedicine Centre, India.

(2) Ns. Suprapto, Polytechnic Sandi Karsa, Indonesia.

(3) Shantala Priyadarshini, University of Latvia, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Vahid Ranaei, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sarah Iqbal, Oman) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA