Peer Review History: Perception and Knowledge of Solar Photovoltaic Technology in Climate Change Mitigation by Households in Embu County, Kenya

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Essam Fathy Mohamed El-Hashash, Al-Azhar University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Shiv Lal, Rajasthan Technical University, India.

(2) Paul Okon Udom, Federal University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aisha Isa Shehu, Abubakar Tafawa Balewa University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Le Van Dai, Industrial University of Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam.

(2) Tarana Afrin Chandel, Integral University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shiv Lal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Paul Okon Udom, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Predicting Onset of Sand Production in Oil Wells using Machine Learning

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hamdy Mohy El-Din Afefy, Tanta University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Yogeesh N, Government First Grade College, India.

(2) Satyanaraynaa, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abimnui Norine Wendi, University of Yaounde I, Cameroon.

(2) K. D. V. Pavan Kumar Varma, Annamalai University, India.

(3) K.Kalaiarasi, Cauvery College for Women, India.

(4) Mahamat Nour Abdallah, University of N’Djamena, Chad.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Lekha A, PESU, India.

(2) Manikandan S, Vel Tech Rangarajan Dr. Sagunthala R&D Institute of Science and Technology, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Yogeesh N, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Satyanaraynaa, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessing the Economic Viability of Watermelon Cultivation in Haryana and Karnataka, India: A Comparative Analysis

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Rusu Teodor, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Tahir Saleem, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences & Technology of Kashmir, India.

(2) Ranjit Sambhaji Patil, D.Y. Patil Agriculture & Technical University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Sangeet Ranguwal, Punjab Agricultural University, India.

(2) Wilson Calmon Almeida dos Santos, Fluminense Federal University, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Tahir Saleem, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ranjit Sambhaji Patil, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Different Integrated Nutrient Management Approaches on Growth, Yield Attributes and Yield of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Crop: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Tsoata Esaïe, University of  Yaoundé 1, Cameroon.

(2) Badr Eldin Abdelgadir Moh. Ahmed, Kassala University, Sudan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.95/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Tsoata Esaïe, Cameroon) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Badr Eldin Abdelgadir Moh. Ahmed, Sudan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Qualitative Elements of the World’s Best Educational System: A Thematic Analysis

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Emily Chepngetich Sitienei, Associate Professor, University of Johannesburg, South Africa.

Reviewers:

(1) Elegant Joy Okah-Tim, Rivers State University, Nigeria.

(2) Veeranna Kotagi, Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology, India.

(3) Shehrevar Davierwala, Gandhinagar University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Dheva Rajan S, University of Technology and Applied Sciences Al Musannah, Oman.

(2) Magdaline Bessong Bisong, Federal College of Education Obudu, Nigeria.

(3) Mohammad Montazeri, Arena Design Academy, Iran.

(4) S.S.Venkata Subramanian, Annamalai University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Seiva Subramaniam A/L Ramiah, IPGK Pendidikan Teknik Nilai, Malaysia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.76/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Elegant Joy Okah-Tim, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Veeranna Kotagi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Shehrevar Davierwala, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Revolutionizing Maize (Zea mays l.) Growth: Evaluating the Impact of Tokyo 8 Microorganism-based Biofertilizer in Southern Côte d’Ivoire Farmers’ Fields

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Valarmathi, Scientist, ICAR- Central Institute for Cotton Research, Coimbatore, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Koppula Prawan, Osmania University, India.

(2) Le Quy Kha, Institute of Agricultural Sciences for Southern, Vietnam.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Chinnamani Ilanchezhian, RVS Agricultural College, India.

(2) Henry Okolie, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Nigeria.

(3) Ningthaipuilu Longmei, India.

(4) Noorjehan A.K.A.Hanif, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

(5) Sudip Ghimire, Agriculture and Forestry University Bharatpur, Nepal.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Koppula Prawan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Le Quy Kha, Vietnam) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Combined Application of Inorganic Fertilizer and Organic Manure with Nano Urea on Growth and Yield of Scented Rice

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, Tainan University of Technology, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Sourav Mandal, MAKAUT University, JIS University, India.

(2) Ismarley Lage Horta Morais, Federal University of Uberlândia, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bingliang Zhou, Jiangsu University, China.

(2) Takata B. D., Jijamata College of Science and Arts Bhende, India.

(3) Tole S.B., ASPM’s K.T.Patil College of Pharmacay, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Arbaoui, Université Abdelhamid Ibn Badis, Algeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sourav Mandal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ismarley Lage Horta Morais, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Gene Therapies in the Fight against Liver Disease: A Comprehensive Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatma Mohammad Nasr, Theodor Bilharz Research Institute, Warraq El-hadar, Imbaba, Giza, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Ramdas Bhat, Srinivas College of Pharmacy, India.

(2) Premkumar Daivasikamani, AIMST University, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ramdas Bhat, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Premkumar Daivasikamani, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Rational Design of a Multi-epitope Vaccine for Yak Milk Allergy by Immuno-informatics Approach

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Tsygankova Victoria Anatolyivna, Senior Staff Scientist & Principal Researcher, V.P. Kukhar Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry and Petrochemistry of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine.

Reviewers:

(1) Attapon Cheepsattayakorn, Western University, Thailand.

(2) Allah Rakha Yaseen, School of Biological Sciences, University of the Punjab, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ebreez Ahmed Foud Ali Zaki, Napata College, Sudan.

(2) Tamas Szabo, Semmelweis University, Hungary.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Attapon Cheepsattayakorn, Thailand) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Allah Rakha Yaseen, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: End-to-Side Neurorrhaphy Technique: Exploring Neuronal Regeneration to Restore Nerve Function

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatma Mohammad Nasr, Theodor Bilharz Research Institute, Warraq El-hadar, Imbaba, Giza, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Sudhir Singh, Getwell Hospital, India.

(2) F. Duygu Ozel Demiralp, Yüksek İhtisas Üniversitesi, Türkiye.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Rakesh Gupta, M.G.M. Medical College, India.

(2) SWajeeha Zahra, University of Lahore, Pakistan.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sudhir Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (F. Duygu Ozel Demiralp, Türkiye) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA