Peer Review History: African Breadfruit Seed Oil as Lipid Phase of Self-Emulsifying Drug Delivery System for Improved Gastrointestinal Fluid Solubility of Ibuprofen: Design and Evaluation

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Yong X. Gan, Associate Professor, California State Polytechnic University, USA.

(2) Dr. Amal Hegazi Ahmed Elrefaei, Hot Lab and Waste Management Center, Atomic Energy Authority, Egypt.

(3) Dr. Sung Cheal Moon, Korea Institute of Materials Science (KIMS), Industrial Technology Support Division, Changwon, Republic of Korea.

Reviewers:

(1) Govind Yenge, Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, India.

(2) Neuana Fernando Neuana, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Duangkamol Ruen Ngam, Rajamangala University of Technology Rattanakosin, Thailand.

(2) Thitiphan Chimsook, Maejo University, Thailand.

(3) Yeong Hwang Tan, Universiti Tenaga Nasional, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Bikila Gebeyehu Eticha, Wollega University Shambu Campus, Ethiopia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.45/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Govind Yenge, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Neuana Fernando Neuana, Brazil) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Journal_Change | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Case Report on IRVAN Syndrome

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ahmad M Mansour, Professor, American University of Beirut, Lebanon.

Reviewers:

(1) Sana Nadeem, Foundation University, Pakistan.

(2) Atri Ghosh, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anuradha, Military Hospital Ahmedabad, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sana Nadeem, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Atri Ghosh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: An Unusual Incidental Finding of Drusen in a 32-year-old Woman: A Case Report and Brief Review of Literature

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Panagiotis Tsikripis, University of Athens, Greece.

Reviewers:

(1) Sunil Chaudhry, India.

(2) Mayakalyani Srivathsan, DR D Y Patil Medical College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Vladimir Ryabtsev, Cherkassy Branch of the European University, Ukraine.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.65/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sunil Chaudhry, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mayakalyani Srivathsan, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Challenges Facing Secondary School Teachers in Achieving Effective Job Performance: A Case Study of Meru District Council, Arusha Region

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Dennis Gamad Caballes, School of Teacher Education, Graduate Program School of Teacher Education, The National Teachers College, Philippines.

Reviewers:

(1) Syed Saeed, GHSS, Pakistan.

(2) Onesme Niyibizi, University of Rwanda, College of Education, Rwanda.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) John Amaoge Wordu, Rivers State University, Nigeria.

(2) Hendri Pratama, Malaysia.

(3) Jeremiah Mulinge Kawinzi, South Eastern Kenya University, Kenya.

(4) John Gathage Kunga, Kirinyage University, Kenya.

(5) Novi Yarmanetti, Yogyakarta State University, Indonesia.

(6) Rose May Cora P. Lagon, West Visayas State University Calinog Campus, Philippines.

(7) Waqas Mahmood, The Islamia University Bahawalpur, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Hareesol Khun-Inkeeree, Prince of Songkla University, Thailand.

(2) Ibrahim Arhyel, Abubakar Tafawa Balewa University, Nigeria.

(3) Drs. Sutrisno, Universitas PGRI Semarang, Indonesia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Syed Saeed, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Onesme Niyibizi, Rwanda) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Proposed Integration of Career Orientation as a Separate Subject in Secondary Curriculum

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hiroko Kanoh, Associate Professor, Institute of Arts and Sciences, National University Corporation, Yamagata University, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Julius Martunas Sihite, HKBP Nommensen Pematang Siantar University, Indonesia.

(2) Betcy George, Mosc College of Nursing, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Dewi Yana, Universitas Riau Kepulauan, Indonesia.

(2) Hlaing Htake Khaung Tin, University of Information Technology, Myanmar.

(3) Ndah Divine Selorm, Seventh Day Adventist College of Education, Ghana.

(4) Sharon.S, St.Stephen’s College, India.

(5) Singye Wangchuk, Royal University of Bhutan, Bhutan.

(6) Sunil Kumar Baskey, Rabindra Bharati University, India.

(7) Tehzeeb, University of Education, Lahore, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Priya Adwani, SDJ International College, Veer South Narmad Gujarat University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Julius Martunas Sihite, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Betcy George, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Path Co-efficient Analysis for Yield and Yield Attributing Traits in Sponge Gourd [Luffa cylindrica (L.) Roem.]

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Justin R Nayagam, Union Christian College, India.

(2) Víctor Manuel de Jesús Canché Ek, México.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ana Maria Arambarri, La Plata National University, Argentina.

(2) Emel Ozer, Konya Bahri Dagdas International Agricultural Research Institute, Turkiye.

(3) Khairiah, Universitas Muhammadiyah Bandung, Indonesia.

(4) Kou Hayakawa, Japan.

(5) Leonardo Ornella, Argentina.

(6) Marwan Noori Ramadhan, University of Basrah, Iraq.

(7) M. Manimaran, College of Agricultural Technology, Theni, India.

(8) Noosheen Zahid, University of Poonch Rawalakot, Pakistan.

(9) Sakka Samudin, Tadulako University, Indonesia.

(10) Suchit Kumar, Bihar Veterinary College, Bihar Animal Sciences University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Alaa Mohammed Mohammed El – Shoura, Agriculture Research Center, Giza, Egypt.

(2) Cocan Ileana, University of Life Sciences “King Mihai I ” from Timisoara, Romania.

(3) Jeverson Santiago Quishpe Gaibor, Salesian Polytechnic University, Ecuador.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Justin R Nayagam, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Víctor Manuel de Jesús Canché Ek, México) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Comparative Diagnosis of Urinary Schistosomiasis in Patients from Primary Healthcare Centers in Keffi, North Central Nigeria, Using Microscopy and PCR

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Damtew Bekele Eressi, Assistant Professor, College of Natural and Computational Sciences, Ambo University, Ethiopia.

Reviewers:

(1) Takalani Girly Nemungadi, University of Kwa Zulu-Natal, South Africa.

(2) Dewi Andriani, Adi Husada College of Health Sciences, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Felix Nyatigo Nyang’wechi, Kenya.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Rohit Kumar Verma, Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Takalani Girly Nemungadi, South Africa) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Dewi Andriani, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Plants and Traditional Contraceptive Practices: An Ethnobotanical Study among the Anyi Ndenye in Eastern Côte d’Ivoire

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Francisco Cruz-Sosa, Autonomous Metropolitan University, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Grace Pam, University of Jos, Nigeria.

(2) Jdaidi Nouri, Sylvo-Pastoral Institute of Tabarka, University of Jendouba, Tunisia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Nveikoueing Francis, University of Ngaoundere, Cameroon.

(2) Tchapda Charly, University of Yaoundé 1, Cameroon.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Mahsa Kamali, Islamic Azad University Science and Research Branch, Iran.

(2) Ngwatshipane Madonna Mashabela, South Africa.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Grace Pam, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jdaidi Nouri, Tunisia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Current Rehabilitative Concepts in Ear Nose and Throat Department, University of Medical Sciences Teaching Hospital (UNIMEDTH): Challenges Encountered

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sung-Kun Kim, Northeastern State University, USA.

(2) Prof. Jong-Wuu Wu, National Chiayi University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Vinod M Choudhari, Shri Ayurved College, India.

(2) Raeed M. Abdullah, Northern Technical University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bhavik R Jani, RK University, India.

(2) Gulmira Derbissalina, Astana Medical University, Kazakhstan.

(3) Luana de Oliveira Hernandes, Brazil.

(4) Olena Grechana, Zaporizhzhya State Medical and Pharmacy University, Ukraine.

(5) Salman Zahir, Northwest General Hospital and Research Centre, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Fattma A.Ali, Hawler Medical University, Iraq.

(2) Henry Ogbonna, University of Alabama at Birmingham, USA.

(3) Mamatha B Patil, RRMCH, India.

(4) Olena Yelizarova, State Institution O.M. Marzіeiev Institute for Public Health of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine.

(5) Paul Andrew Bourne, Vocational Training Development Institute (VTDI), Jamaica.

(6) Rusul Hashem Hamza, Middle Technical University, Iraq.

(7) Tejeshwari B V, Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences (RGUHS), Rajarajeswari College of Nursing, India.

(8) Vinod Choudhari, Shri Ayurved Mahavidyalaya, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.95/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Vinod M Choudhari, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Raeed M. Abdullah, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of Botanicals against Rice Case Worm Parapoynx stagnalis Zeller. (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Daniele De Wrachien, Retired Professor, The State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Amarasinghe, University of Kelamiya, Sri Lanka.

(2) Tibebu Mamuye, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Amarasinghe, Sri Lanka) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Tibebu Mamuye, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA