Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Dalong Guo, Henan University of Science and Technology, China.

Reviewers:

(1) V. Ragamalika, KL University, India.

(2) Nwoko Ijeoma C., National Biotechnology Research and Development Agency, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (V. Ragamalika, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nwoko Ijeoma C, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohamed Fadel, National Research Center, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Sudesh Devi, CCS HAU, India.

(2) Cristina Mihaela Marinciu, National Agricultural Research and Development Institute Fundulea, Romania.

(3) R VijayKumar, Acharya Nagarjuna University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sudesh Devi, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Cristina Mihaela Marinciu, Romania) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (R VijayKumar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Lixiang Cao, Sun Yat-sen University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Mohamed Mohamed El-Komi, National Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries Alexandria, Egypt.

(2) Junir Antonio Lutinski, Universidade Comunitaria da Regiao de Chapeco, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mohamed Mohamed El-Komi, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Junir Antonio Lutinski, Brazil) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mariusz Cycoń, M.University of Silesia, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Hamdi Shaaban Abd El-Karim, Agricultural Research Center, Egypt.

(2) Sajida Mushtaq, Government College Women University Sialkot, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hamdi Shaaban  Abd El-Karim, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sajida Mushtaq, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Nicolás Padilla-Raygoza, Institute of Public Health from Guanajuato State, México.

Reviewers:

(1) Paul C, University of Nigeria, Nsukka (UNN), Nigeria

(2) Chijioke Noris Ezinwa, University of Nigeria, Nigeria

(3) Omagha Rachel, University of Lagos, Nigeria

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Paul C, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Chijioke Noris Ezinwa, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Omagha Rachel, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Chan-Min Liu, Xuzhou Normal University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) George Julius Babune, Tanzania Institute of Accountancy, Tanzania.

(2) Ebrahim Abbasi, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

(3) Ilham Zaidi, International Society For Chronic Illnesses, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.34/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (George Julius Babune, Tanzania) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ebrahim Abbasi, Iran) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ilham Zaidi, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dariusz Jacek Jakóbczak, Assistant Professor, Koszalin University of Technology, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Aqib Zafar, Xinjiang University Urumqi, China.

(2) Nurul Raihen, Fontbonne University, USA.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Aqib Zafar, China) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nurul Raihen, USA) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dariusz Jacek Jakóbczak, Assistant Professor, Koszalin University of Technology, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Buvana M, PSNA College of Engineering and Technology, India.

(2) Nihal Yapage, University of Ruhuna, Sri Lanka.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Buvana M, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nihal Yapage, Sri Lanka) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Chandra Shekhar Kapoor, Assistant Professor, Govind Guru Tribal University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Makaza Kasirayi, Great Zimbabwe University, Zimbabwe.

(2) Sanjay Saha Sonet, Noakhali Science and Technology University, Bangladesh.

(3) Kukuh Setiawan, University of Lampung, Bandar Lampung, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Makaza Kasirayi, Zimbabwe) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sanjay Saha Sonet, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Kukuh Setiawan, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Daniele De Wrachien, Retired Professor, The State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Mohamed Khamar, Mohammed V University, Morocco.

(2) M. Ananthi, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

(3) Amina Tariq, Lahore College for Women University, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mohamed Khamar, Morocco) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (M. Ananthi, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Amina Tariq, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA