Peer Review History: Ultrasonographic Findings in Pre-operative Cataract Patients in A Private Eye Clinic in South East, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Erich Cosmi, Associate Professor, University of Padua, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Prasad K N, Arunai Medical College and Hospital, India.

(2) Abha Vermam, School of Excellence for Eye, M.G.M. Medical College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Gustavo Tamayo, Bogota Laser Ocular Surgery Center, Colombia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.75/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Prasad K N, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Abha Verma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Attitude of Rural Youth towards Agriculture as a Source of Livelihood in Rajasthan, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fang Xiang, International Business School, University of International and Business Economics, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Marlia Musa, Mara Technological University, Malaysia.

(2) Fatemeh Javanbakht Sheikhahmad, Tabriz University, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Intan Maizura Abdul Rashid, UiTM, Malaysia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Marlia Musa, Malaysia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Fatemeh Javanbakht Sheikhahmad, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Millet and Its Significance on the Eve of International Year of Millets 2023: Culture, Consumption and Conservation Karnataka, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Shao-I Chiu, Associate Professor, Da-Yeh University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Bindu V.S, M.S.M College, Kerala University, India.

(2) Maureen Akazue, Delta State University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bindu V.S, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Maureen Akazue, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Taxonomical Approach on Different Soil Types of Kalyana Karnataka, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, New York, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Alejandro Villalobos-Aragon, Universidad Autonoma De Chihuahua, Mexico.

(2) Essam Samir Soliman, Suez Canal University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Jacob Pitti, University of Panama, Panama.

(2) James Peaches Phiri, Malawi.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Harshit Pant Jugran, G. B. Pant National Institute of Himalayan Environment, Kosi-Katarmal, India.

(2) Jorge Octavio Virues Delgadillo, Universidad Veracruzana, México.

(3) Lazaro Raymundo Reyes Gutierrez, Universidad Autonoma Metropolitana Unidad Lerma (UAML), Mexico.

(4) Nedjah  Nawel, National Higher School of Technology and Engineering –  Annaba, Algeria.

(5) Poonam Jaiswal, JDB Govt Girls College, University of Kota. Rajasthan, India.

(6) Ratan Lal Solanki, KVK,  Chittorgarh, MPUAT, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Alejandro Villalobos-Aragon, Mexico) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Essam Samir Soliman, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Studies on the Effect of Chemical Weed Management on Growth Indices, Yield and Quality of Irrigated Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, New York, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Olagunju Johnson Adetuwo, Adekunle Ajasin University, Nigeria.

(2) Zakaria Abdulkarim Al Naser, Damascus University, Syria.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Olagunju Johnson Adetuwo, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Zakaria Abdulkarim Al Naser, Syria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Enhancing Sustainable Crop Production through Innovations in Precision Agriculture Technologies

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ahmed Mohammed Abu-Dief Mohammed, Assistant Professor, Sohag University, Sohag, Egypt and Taibah University, Saudi Arabia.

Reviewers:

(1) Hafiz Muhammad Bilawal Akram, University of Agriculture, Pakistan.

(2) Khalid El Moutaouakil, Sultan Moulay Slimane University, Morocco.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Alan Joel Servin Prieto, Instituto Tecnologico Superior De Lerdo, Mexico.

(2) Shah Kamal Khan, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Nader Jandaghi, Gonbad Kavous University, Iran.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hafiz Muhammad Bilawal Akram, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Khalid El Moutaouakil, Morocco) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Phenological Variation in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Varieties through Foliar Application of Cytokinin Analogs and Nutrients under Water Deficit Stress

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Daniele De Wrachien (Retired), The State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Ratna Dewi Eskundari, Universitas Veteran Bangun Nusantara, Indonesia.

(2) Jamile Nazari, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Nor Hairul Bin Palal, Politeknik Tun Syed Nasir Syed Ismail, Malaysia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.45/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ratna Dewi Eskundari, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jamile Nazari, Iran) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Beyond Community Health Service Provision: Assessing the Knowledge Attitude and Practice of Eye Care among Beneficiaries of an Intervention in an Inner-City Community in Lagos Metropolis

Editor(s):.

(1) Dr. P. Veeramuthumari, Assistant Professor, V.V.Vanniaperumal College for Women, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Mehak Mufti, University of Kashmir, India.

(2) Pankaj Ray Adhikari, National Academy of Medical Sciences, Biratnagar Eye Hospital, Nepal.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Ashutosh Dayal, Subodh Agarwal Memorial Eye Hospital, India.

(2) Soheila Damiri, Tehran University of Medical Science, Iran.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mehak Mufti, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pankaj Ray Adhikari, Nepal) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comprehensive Assessment of Aphid (Lipaphis erysimi (Kalt.) Resistance in Mustard Cultivars

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Afroz Alam, Associate Professor, Banasthali Vidyapith, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Mukhtar Iderawumi Abdulraheem, Henan Agricultural University, China.

(2) Iosob Gabriel-Alin, Vegetable Research and Development Station, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Tahar Chaouche Souad, Centre for Scientific and Technical Research on Arid Regions, Algeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mukhtar Iderawumi Abdulraheem, China) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Iosob Gabriel-Alin, Romania) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparative Effects of Garcinia kola and Garlic Extracts on Some Liver and Haematological Functions in High Salt Diet-Induced Hypertensive Wistar Rats

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Muhammad Abdul Rehman Rashid, Assistant Professor, Government College University Faisalabad, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Mukti Anilkumar Jadav, Gandhinagar Institute of Pharmacy, Gandhinagar University, India.

(2) M Sivakumar, Sree Balaji Medical College and Hospital, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1)  Arun Raj GR, Parul Institute of Ayurved and Research, Parul University, India.

(2)  Avra Pratim Chowdhury, Gauhati University, Bangladesh.

(3)  Hossam Khaled Saad El-Deen, Animal Production Research Institute, Egypt.

(4) Neena Nair, University of Rajasthan, India.

(5)  Nilesh Bhagvat Chaudhari, SES Arunamai College of Pharmacy, India.

(6)  Sarwar Mohammed Sadq, University of Sulaimani, Iraq.

(7)  Sowmya M.N, SS Ayurveda Medical College & Hospital, India.

(8)  Thaer Abdulqader Salih , University of Anbar, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) M. David, Karnatak University Dharwad, India.

(2) Omkarswamy Maradimath, Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mukti Anilkumar Jadav, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (M Sivakumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v3_and_Feedback_v3 | File 1 | NA