Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, New York, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Ranbir Singh, SKUAST, India.

(2) Aman Sharma, Punjab Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ranbir Singh, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Aman Sharma, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Daniele De Wrachien, State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) M. A. Barote, Azad Mahavidyalaya, India.

(2) S. Baskar, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.35/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (M. A. Barote, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (S. Baskar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Simone Aquino, Instituto de Pesquisas Energéticas e Nucleares (IPEN), Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Priyadarshini  P A, Bengaluru City University, India.

(2) G. Gayathry, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Marbe Alexandra Cardona Arengas, Corporación Universitaria Lasallista, Colombia.

(2) Suresh Raghunathrao Kagne, Badrinarayan Barwale College, India.

(3) V.Priya, PSG College of Arts & Science, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Priyadarshini P A, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (G. Gayathry, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Bojan Durin, Associate Professor, University North, Varaždin, Croatia.

Reviewers:

(1) Akeel M. Kadim, College of Science, Al Karkh University of Science, Iraq.

(2) Reem Razzaq Abdulhussein, University of Information Technology and Communications, Iraq.

(3) Kadhim Fadhil Nasir, AL Furat Alawsat Technical University, AL Mussaib Technical College, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Hanan Mohamed Aly Hasan, Cairo University, Egypt.

(2) Khandaker D Islam, Royal University of Bhutan, Kingdom of Bhutan.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Akeel M. Kadim, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Reem Razzaq Abdulhussein, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Kadhim Fadhil Nasir, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Valarmathi, Scientist, ICAR- Central Institute for Cotton Research, Coimbatore, India.

Reviewers:

(1) N. Geetha, Sugar Research Institute of Fiji, Fiji.

(2) Aruna Sri Pinagari, Acharya N. G. Ranga Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Pixley K. Kipsumbai, University of Eldoret, Kenya.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (N. Geetha, Fiji) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Aruna Sri Pinagari, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Chandra Shekhar Kapoor, Pacific Academy of Higher Education and Research University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Anang Susanto, Merdeka University, Indonesia.

(2) Ali Hussein Jasim, Al-Qasim Green University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abanda Well Victorien Bienvenu, Cameroon.

(2) Kerrouche Ibrahim, University of Constantine 1, Algeria.

(4) Salisu Audu Baba, College of Education, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.45/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Anang Susanto, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Ali Hussein Jasim, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Wen-Cheng Liu, National United University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Imtiaz Ali, Regional Agricultural Research Institute, Pakistan.

(2) Alabi Olusoji David, Durban University of Technology, South Africa.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Imtiaz Ali, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Alabi Olusoji David, South Africa) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. (Dr.) Ioana Grozea, King Michael I of Romania” in University of Life Sciences Timisoara, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Annelise Aila Gomes Lobom, University of Sao Paulo, Brazil.

(2) V. N. Meena Devi, Noorul Islam Centre for Higher Education, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ana Maria Arambarri, Universidad Nacional De La Plata (UNLP), La Plata National University, Argentina.

(2) Fatemeh Ahmadnia, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Iran.

(3) Giovanni Guimarães Landa, Centro Universitário Vale do Cricaré (UNIVC), Brazil.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Annelise Aila Gomes Lobo, Brazil) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (V. N. Meena Devi, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Anthony R. Lupo, University of Missouri, Columbia, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Ogunrinola Olabisi Olufunmilayo, lagos State University, Nigeria.

(2) Pablo Huerta Fernández, La Molina National Agrarian University, Perú.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) B N Hazarika, Central Agricultural University, India.

(2) Jyotiba Shivaji Kumbhar, India.

(3) T.Amose, The American College Afflicted to Madurai Kamaraj University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ogunrinola Olabisi Olufunmilayo, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Pablo Huerta Fernández, Perú) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Daniele De Wrachien, State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Carpinelli Assunta, CNR-IBFM, Italy.

(2) Shahnaz Majeed, Universiti Kuala Lumpur, Royal College of Medicine, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ir. Ida Nur Istina, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Khalida Ali Thejeel, Al-Karkh University of Science, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Carpinelli Assunta, Italy) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Shahnaz Majeed, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA