Editor(s):

(1) Prof. José Alberto Duarte Moller, University of Sonora, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) J.Uma Maheswari, Kamaraj College of Engineering and Technology, India.

(2) Neeraj Gupta, Amity University Haryana, India.

(3) Banka.Sujatha, Bvrit Hyderabad College of Engineering for Women, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) M. Ranga Rao, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.34/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (J.Uma Maheswari, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Neeraj Gupta, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Banka.Sujatha, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Dilip Kumar Darjee, Indira Gandhi National Open University, India.

(2) Frank Yeboah Adusei, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, U.S.A.

(3) Karthik Reddy, University of Mysore, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Dilip Kumar Darjee, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Frank Yeboah Adusei, U.S.A.) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Karthik Reddy, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Benjapon Kunlanit, Mahasarakham University, Thailand.

(2) Endang Noerhartati, Universitas Wijaya Kusuma Surabaya, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Geeta Singh, JNKVV Jabalpur, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Benjapon Kunlanit, Thailand) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Endang Noerhartati, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Manal Abdel Rahman Sorour, Food Technology Research Institute, Agriculture Research Center, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) R. Ninija Merina, University College of Engineering, India.

(2) Ram Krishna Neupane, Nepal.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (R. Ninija Merina, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ram Krishna Neupane, Nepal) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Francisco Cruz-Sosa, Autonomous Metropolitan University, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Tatini Debnath, MAKAUT, India.

(2) Nesma Ibraheim El-naseery, Zagazig University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Tatini Debnath, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nesma Ibraheim El-naseery, Egypt) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Biswajit Dash, School of Health and Medical Sciences, Adamas University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Shital Chaukhande, Sant Gadge Baba Amravati University, India.

(2) Eunice Reis Batista, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shital Chaukhande, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Eunice Reis Batista, Brazil) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Gustavo Henrique Silva de Souza, Federal Institute of The North of Minas Gerais, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Bbaale Benjamin, Makerere University, Uganda.

(2) Ahmad Idris, Universitas Islam Kadiri, Indonesia.

(3) Armando P. Delfino, College of Education, Westcliff University, USA.

(4) Sreeja. K, NSB Academy, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bbaale Benjamin, Uganda) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ahmad Idris, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Armando P. Delfino, USA) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Sreeja. K, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s): 

(1) Prof. Vlasta Hus, University of Maribor, Slovenia.

Reviewers:

(1) Millicent Adanne Eze, University of Abuja, Nigeria.

(2) Randa Hariri, Dar Al-Hekma University, Saudi Arabia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Millicent Adanne Eze, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Randa Hariri, Saudi Arabia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s): 

(1) Dr. Ravi Kumar Kotturi, Assistant Professor, Vidya Jyothi Institute of Technology (Autonomous), Hyderabad, India.

Reviewers:

(1) James O. Toyin, Auburn University, USA.

(2) Bhupinder Kaur Srao, CU / PTU, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mário Lucio Pereira, Pontifical Catholic University of Minas Gerais, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.55/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (James O. Toyin, USA) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bhupinder Kaur Srao, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Abdel-Raheem, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Arun Kumar, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

(2) Yogesh Kumar Kosariya, Indira Gandhi Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Pritam Prakash Patil, Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.15/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Arun Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Yogesh Kumar Kosariya, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA