Peer Review History: Pedunculated Focal Nodular Hyperplasia Adherent to the Gall Bladder: A Case Report

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ramesh Gurunathan, Sunway Medical Center, Malaysia.

Reviewers:

(1) Samir Ranjan Nayak, DR Y S R University, India.

(2) Sawsan M. Jabbar AL-Hasnawi, College of Medicine, University of Kerbala, Iraq.

(3) S. C. Ahila, SRM University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Astrida Velena, Latvian Institute of Organic Synthesis, Latvia.

(2) Zachariah Chowdhury, Mahamana Pandit Madan Mohan Malaviya Cancer Centre, Homi Bhabha Cancer Hospital, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Samir Ranjan Nayak, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Sawsan M. Jabbar AL-Hasnawi, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (S. C. Ahila, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparison of Prevalence of Oxis Contact in Primary Maxillary and Mandibular Teeth: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. David E. Martin, Martin Pharma Consulting, LLC, Shawnee, OK, USA and Chief Development Officer, Director and Founder, Gaithersburg, MD, Maryland, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Ratheesh M. S., Sree Anjaneya Institute of Dental Sciences, India.

(2) Noor A. Sulaiman, Mosul University, Iraq.

(3) Rajashekar Reddy Vundela, Sri Siddhartha Dental College and Hospital, India.

(4) Tayfun Alaçam, Lokman Hekim University, Türkiye.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aruna Sharma, Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth University, India.

(2) Kola.Srikanth Reddy, DRYSRUHS, India.

(3) M. Kaviya, GenOmm Medical Centre, India.

(4) Mônica Barbosa de Sousa Freitas, Florida Christian University – FCU, USA.

(5) Raian Alzoaabi, Arab University For Science And Technology, Syria.

(6) R. S. Pavithra, Dr. MGR Medical University, India.

(7) Safae El Abkari, Mohammed V University, Morocco.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Hassanain Jwad Abidalhussein, Kerbala University, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ratheesh M. S., India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Noor A. Sulaiman, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Rajashekar Reddy Vundela, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Tayfun Alaçam, Türkiye) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Geo-Electric Survey of Potential Aquifer Inome Parts of Amaigbo, in Imo State, Using Vertical Electrical Sounding and Well Log Data

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Natt Makul, Assistant Professor, Phranakhon Rajabhat University, Thailand.

Reviewers:

(1) Victor Ofori Agyemang, Ghana.

(2) Oluwaseun Joseph Akomolafe, Kansas State University, United States.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Kadhim Naief Kadhim, University of Babylon, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Homayoun Moghimi, Payame Noor University, Iran.

(2) Jean Daniel Ngoh, University of Yaounde 1, Cameroon.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Victor Ofori Agyemang, Ghana) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Oluwaseun Joseph Akomolafe, United States) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Problem Analysis of Garlic Cultivation in Major Production Areas in Luzon, Philippines

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Afroz Alam, Banasthali University, Rajasthan, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Taghreed  El Sayed Eissa, Horticulture Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Egypt.

(2) B. K. Sikka, College of Agribusiness Management, G B Pant University of Agriculture & Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Jaime Thissen, I2S6 Institute, United States.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Hanaa  A. Abokoura, Soils, Water and Environment Research Institute (SWERI), Egypt.

(2) J. Vasanthakumar, Annamalai University, India.

(3) Mohammed Nuru Yakubu, Abubakar Tafawa Balewa University, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Taghreed El Sayed Eissa, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (B. K. Sikka, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparison of Some In-vitro Antioxidant Properties of Cola acuminata and Cola nitida Fruit Testas

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. M. Yuvaraj, Assistant Professor, Agricultural College and Research Institute, India.

Reviewers:

(1) G. Krishnaveni, KBN College, India.

(2) Amal Abdulilah Alkshab, University of Mosul, Iraq.

(3) Muharni, University of Sriwijaya, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Assumani Zabo Idrissa, National Pedagogical University, Congo.

(2) Susi Desminarti, Indonesia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (G. Krishnaveni, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Amal Abdulilah Alkshab, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Muharni, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Response of Sugarcane Cultivars to Different Irrigation Regime under Peninsular Zone of Maharashtra, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Isidro Alberto Perez Bartolome, Associate Professor, University of Valladolid, Spain.

Reviewers:

(1) Chandra Kant Saxena, ICAR-Central Institute of Agricultural Engineering, India.

(2) Kotb Amer Farghali Omran, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.65/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Chandra Kant Saxena, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Kotb Amer Farghali Omran, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Performance of Gladiolus Genotypes for Growth and Flowering under Gangetic Region of Bihar, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Assistant Professor, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College, Vidyagiri, Bantwal, India

Reviewers:

(1) D. R. Mehta, Junagadh Agricultural University, India.

(2) Hafiz  Basheer Ahmad, Sugarcane Research Institute, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Essam Samir Soliman, Suez Canal University, Egypt.

(2) Pankaj Kumar Ray, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Promila Krishna Chahal, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (D. R. Mehta, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Hafiz Basheer Ahmad, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Regression Equation Model for Brinjal Pests (Solanum melongena L.) in Maharashtra Plain Zone

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Rasmia Sayed Sayed Darwesh, Central Laboratory for Date Palm Research and Development, Agriculture Research Center, Giza, Egypt.

(2) Dr. Afroz Alam, Associate Professor, Banasthali University (accredited A grade by NAAC), P.O. Banasthali Vidyapith, India.

Reviewers:

(1) D. M. Damasia, College of Agriculture, Navsari Agricultural University, India.

(2) Suprakash Pal, Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Manuel Emilio Milla Pino, National University of Jaen, Peru.

(2) Ntambo, University of Lubumbashi, Congo.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Ibrahim E. Shehata, Egypt.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (D. M. Damasia, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Suprakash Pal, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparison of Canonical and Generalized Canonical Correlation Analysis Using Some Continuous Distributions

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dariusz Jacek Jakóbczak, Assistant Professor, Koszalin University of Technology, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Eric David Cohen, University of Campinas, Brazil.

(2) Eshetu Dadi Gurmu, Samara University, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Pavitha N, Vishwakarma University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Eric David Cohen, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Eshetu Dadi Gurmu, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Journal change | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Collection and Marketing of Tendu Leaves in Rajasthan, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Wang Guangjun, Pearl River Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, China.

Reviewers:

(1) R Ramakrishnan, India.

(2) Prem Kumar, Garden City University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Krishnamoorthi M, Kristu Jayanti College, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Renjith Kumar. R, University of Technology and Applied Sciences, Oman.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (R Ramakrishnan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Prem Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA