Peer Review History: Exploring Regenerative Mechanisms: Comparative Analysis of Callus Induction and Shoot Regeneration in Valeriana jatamansi Jones through In-vitro and In-vivo Cultivation

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Valarmathi, Scientist, ICAR- Central Institute for Cotton Research, Coimbatore, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Rebeca Menchaca, Universidad Veracruzana, México.

(2) Beadaa Abdalqader Mahdii, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Hira Singh, Punjab Agricultural University, India.

(2) Nweze Basil Obasi, Ebonyi State University, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Rebeca Menchaca, México) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Beadaa Abdalqader Mahdii, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Analysis of Parent Offspring Regression of Selected Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata [L]. Walp.) Agronomic Traits in Phosphorus Limiting Soil

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iqtidar Hussain, Assistant Professor, Gomal University, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Nerbéwendé Sawadogo, Université Joseph KI-ZERBO, Burkina Faso.

(2) Harshal E. Patil, Navsari Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Nerbéwendé Sawadogo, Burkina Faso) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Harshal E. Patil, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Rhizobium Coating on Physical and Engineering Properties of Chickpea Seed

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Assistant Professor, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College, Vidyagiri, Bantwal, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Satyavani Godavarthi, India.

(2) Akeel M. Kadim, College of Science, Al Karkh University of Science, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Satyavani Godavarthi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Akeel M. Kadim, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Maize Crop Evapotranspiration Using Eddy Covariance Flux Tower Weather Data

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. C. S. Kapoor, Pacific Academy of Higher Education and Research University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Deepak Kumar, School of Agriculture, GIET University, India.

(2) Amaury de Souza, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Deepak Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Amaury de Souza, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Proposed Buys-Ballot Estimates for Multiplicative Model with the Error Variances

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Bharatish A, Assistant Professor, RV College of Engineering, Bengaluru, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Anggreini D. N. Rupidara, Artha Wacana Christian University, Indonesia.

(2) Mihai Caramihai, University Politehnica, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Anggreini D. N. Rupidara, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Mihai Caramihai, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Genetic Diversity and Fingerprinting of Sugarcane Varieties Using Simple Sequence Repeat (SSR) Markers

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Nebi Bilir, Professor, Isparta University of Applied Sciences, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Ir. Yayan Apriyana, Indonesia.

(2) Victor Manuel de Jesús Canché Ek, México.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ir. Yayan Apriyana, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Victor Manuel de Jesús Canché Ek, México) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Application of Machine Learning to Air Pollution Studies: A Systematic Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Huan-Liang Tsai, Professor, Da-Yeh University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Arun Kumar Yadav, Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam Technical University, India.

(2) Era Upadhyay, Amity Institute of Biotechnology, Amity University, India.

(3) Julio Cesar Bastos Fernandes, Institute of Science Education, Federal University of Western Pará, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Julio Cesar Bastos Fernandes, Federal University of Western Pará, Brazil.

(2) Nabil Majd Alawi, University of Technology, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Arun Kumar Yadav, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Era Upadhyay, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Julio Cesar Bastos Fernandes, Brazil) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Buys-Ballot Estimates for Overall Sample Variances and Their Statistical Properties: A Mixed Model Case

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Muhammad Mujtaba Shaikh, Assistant Professor, Mehran University of Engineering and Technology, Jamshoro, Pakistan.

(2) Dr. Rachid Masrour, Professor, Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University, Morocco.

(3) Dr. Chunhua Zhou, Professor, College of Horticulture and Plant Protection, Yangzhou University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Jacob Otieno Ong’ala, Namibia University of Science and Technology, Namibia.

(2) Tapati Basak, Jahangirnagar University, Bangladesh.

(3) Sulayman Muhammad Kabeer, University Putra Malaysia, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Onyedikachi O. John, Rhema University Nigeria, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Jacob Otieno Ong’ala, Namibia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Tapati Basak, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Sulayman Muhammad Kabeer, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v3_and_Feedback_v3 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Experimental Evaluation of Optimization in Cr and Dr Digital Radiography Systems: A Study with Anthropomorphic Phantom

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Orlando Manuel da Costa Gomes, Professor, Lisbon Accounting and Business School (ISCAL), Lisbon Polytechnic Institute, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Nilima Patil, SRTRGMC, MUHS University, India.

(2) Mahmoud Imad Mousa, Al Azhar University, Palestine.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Nilima Patil, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Mahmoud Imad Mousa, Palestine) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of Suitability of Tomato Solids as a Preservative in Flavoured Paneer

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Aleksey Aleksandrovich Hlopitskiy, Associate Professor, Ukrainian State University of Chemical Technology, Dnepropetrovsk, Ukraine.

Reviewers:

(1) Nguemouo Nguegang Igor, International Medical Corps, Cameroon.

(2) Anil Savji Kotiya, Fisheries Research & Training Center, Kamdhenu University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Ramesh Subramani, PSGR Krishnammal College for Women, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.77/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Nguemouo Nguegang Igor, Cameroon) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Anil Savji Kotiya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA