Peer Review History: Study on Promotional Strategy of Syngenta Product Amistar in Hoshiarpur District of Punjab, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Roxana Plesa, Senior Lecturer, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Raj Kumar Yogi, India.

(2) Moataz Eliw, Al-Azhar University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Habiba Usman Aliyu, Federal University of Kashere, Nigeria.

(2) Udokang Anietie Edem, The Federal Polytechnic Offa, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Hussein Ali Salim, Iraq.

(2) Sandeep Bhardwaj, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, India.

(3) Sarhan Ahmed Soliman, Egypt.

(4) Timothy A. Okeowo, Lagos State University of Science and Technology, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Raj Kumar Yogi, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Moataz Eliw, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Marketing Efficiency of Cocoon in Salem District of Tamil Nadu, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Shakeel-Ul-Rehman, Assistant Professor, Islamic University of Science and Technology, India.

(2) Dr. Mevlut Gul, Associate Professor, Isparta Applied Science University, Turkey.

(3) Dr. Roxana Plesa, Senior Lecturer, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Lavjit Kaur, Punjab Agricultural University, India.

(2) Mohammad Reza Zargaran Khouzani, Khuzestan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bharti, ICAR-IASRI, India.

(2) C. Tholkappian, Government Arts and Science College Mettur Dam Tamil Nadu, India.

(3) Khaled Abdel-Moneim Hammam, Horticulture Research Institute, Agriculture Research Center (ARC), Egypt.

(4) L.M.A.Shamila, Eastern University, Sri Lanka.

(5) Olha Shapoval, Kharkiv National Medical University, Ukraine.

(6) R. Mahalakshmi, India.

(7) Sajad A. Saraf, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir (SKUAST-K), India.

(8) Shahram Gilaninia, IAURASHT.AC.IR, Iran.

(9) T. Amose, The American College, Madurai Kamaraj University, India.

(10) Wardis Girsang, Pattimura University, Indonesia.

(11) Yudha Trinoegraha Adiputra, University of Lampung, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Yan Yunxian, Jilin Agricultural University, China.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Lavjit Kaur, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Mohammad Reza Zargaran Khouzani, Iran) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Resource Use Efficiency and Constraints in the Production of Direct Seeded Rice in Haryana, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fang Xiang, International Business School, University of International and Business Economics, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Anjali Tomar, RVSKVV, India.

(2) Aparna Jaiswal, College of Agriculture, JNKVV, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Anjali Tomar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Aparna Jaiswal, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Business Plan and Implementation Report on Star-Egg: Omega-3-Enriched Egg in Sleman, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Chun-Chien Kuo, Associate Professor, National Taipei University of Business, Taiwan.

(2) Dr. Rakesh Verma, Associate Professor, AKTU Lucknow University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Usry Abdullah, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia.

(2) Vyomkesh Bhatt, G.L. Bajaj College of Technology and Management,  India.

(3) Rakesh Pandit, IMT,  India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.76/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Usry Abdullah, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Vyomkesh Bhatt, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Rakesh Pandit, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effects of Aloe vera Gel on the Homeopoietic, Biochemical and Histological Parameters and Bone Marrow of Wistar Rats

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Tapanee Hongratanaworakit, Associate Professor, Srinakharinwirot University, Thailand.

Reviewers:

(1) Dipali Shantaram Pingale, Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj College of Nursing, India.

(2) Vibha Singh, KGMU, India.

(3) Qaiser Jabeen, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Camilla Scanlan, University of Sydney, Australia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Dipali Shantaram Pingale, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Vibha Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Qaiser Jabeen, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Hydatid Cyst of the Psoas: A Report of 3 Cases

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Pandiaraja. J, Shree Devi Hospital, India.

Reviewers:

(1) S. Jayagandhi, Pondicherry Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

(2) Nemanja Rancic, University of Defence, Serbia.

(3) Tahrir N. Aldelaimi, University of Anbar, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abha Rani Kujur, St Johns Medical College Hospital, India.

(2) Cherrybansal, DR S. S. Tantia Medical College, Hospital and Research Center, India.

(3) Chishti Tanhar Bakth Choudhury, Shaheed Monsur Ali Medical College, Bangladesh.

(4) Janice Jaison, Maeer Mit Pune’s MIMER Medical College & Dr BSTR Hospital, India.

(5) Julian E. Losanoff Md Facs, University of Nevada Las Vegas and VA Southern Nevada Healthcare System, USA.

(6) Marcel Cerqueira Cesar Machado, University of São Paulo, Brazil.

(7) Nalisson Marques Pereira, UNIFAP, Brazil.

(8) Stan Florin Gheorghe, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Romania.

(9) Sunny Doodu Mante, Ghana.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Aliyu Umar Farinyaro, Federal Teaching Hospital Katsina, Nigeria.

(2) Altina Xhaferi, Medicine University, Albania.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (S.Jayagandhi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Nemanja Rancic, Serbia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Tahrir N. Aldelaimi, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Progression of Powdery Mildew of Indian Mustard (Brassica juncea L.) in Relation to Weather Parameters

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Wen-Cheng Liu, National United University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Afifa Jahan, Professor Jayashankar Telangana State Agricultural University, India.

(2) Theeranat Suwanaruang, Kalasin University, Thailand.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) V. Guhan, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

(2) Yogesh Ashok Garde, Navsari Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Abd El-Rahman  Abd El-Raouf Ahmed, Agricultural Engineering Research Institute, Egypt.

(2) Jamal Abdul Rahman Tawfeeq, College of Agricultural Engineering Sciences, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

(3) Mukesh Kumar, Government College Bahadurgarh, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.65/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Afifa Jahan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Theeranat Suwanaruang, Thailand) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Growth Promoting Trait of Yeasts Isolated from Tomato in Relation to IAA Production

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Afroz Alam, Associate Professor, Banasthali University (accredited A grade by NAAC), P.O. Banasthali Vidyapith, India.

(2) Dr. Imran Shabbir, Assistant Professor, Bahauddin Zakariya University (BZU), Multan, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Samiran Patra, West Bengal University of Animal and Fishery Sciences, India.

(2) George Timothy Opande, Kaimosi Friends University, Kenya.

(3) Mohamed Khamar, Mohammed V University, Morocco.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bello Olunike Adedoyin, Osun State College of Education, Nigeria.

(2) Nazila Biglari, Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM), Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Samiran Patra, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (George Timothy Opande, Kenya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Mohamed Khamar, Morocco) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Mitigation of Salinity Stress by Application of Plant Growth Promoting Substances in Rice

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Wen-Cheng Liu, National United University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Lalit M. Patil, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, India.

(2) Anang Susanto, Merdeka University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Shahla Hashemi-Shahraki, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Iran.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Abdelmonnem S. Kahlel, Northern Technical University, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.55/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Lalit M. Patil, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Anang Susanto, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Nutrio – Hormonal Consortia on Growth and Yield in Groundnut

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Afroz Alam, Associate Professor, Banasthali University (accredited A grade by NAAC), P.O. Banasthali Vidyapith, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Tsekwi Gracious Rinwi, South China University of Technology, China.

(2) Ali Hussein Jasim, Al-Qasim Green University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Tsekwi Gracious Rinwi, China) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Ali Hussein Jasim, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA