Peer Review History: Application of SEM and XRD in the Microstructure Analysis of Fiber-Reinforced Concrete Corroded by Salt Solution

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Pradip K Bhowmik, University of Nevada Las Vegas, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Ajit Nivrutti Patil, D Y Patil University, India.

(2) Devi Muthu, Vivekanandha College of Technology for Women, India.

(3) Latefa Sail, Aboubekr Belkaid University, Algeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.67/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ajit Nivrutti Patil, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Devi Muthu, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Latefa Sail, Algeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Socio-economic Analysis on Shrimp Culture (Litopenaeus vannamei) in Godavari Districts of Andhra Pradesh, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Gonzalo Emiliano Aranda Abreu, Veracruzana University, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Angelica Dobre, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Bucharest, Romania.

(2) Shahid Gul, ICAR – Central Institute of Fisheries Education, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Angelica Dobre, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shahid Gul, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Estimation of Genetic Diversity for Yield and Yield Components in Pearl Millet

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mariusz Cycoń, M. University of Silesia, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) B K Athoni, University of Agricultural Sciences Dharwad, India.

(2) Bishal Subedi, Amrit Science College (Tribhuban University), Nepal.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (B K Athoni, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bishal Subedi, Nepal) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Classroom-based Learning of Teachers in Relation to Curriculum Procedure of Teachers in Public Elementary Schools

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Der-Jang Chi, Chinese Culture University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Suvendu Ray, University of Kalyani, India.

(2) Nimish H. Vasoya, Children’s Research University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Suvendu Ray, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nimish H. Vasoya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Internet Usage on the Academic Achievement of Secondary School Students

Editor(s):

(1) Prof.  Dennis Gamad Caballes, De La Salle-College Of Saint Benilde, Philippines.

Reviewers:

(1) B Sridevi, Saveetha Engineering College (Autonomous), India.

(2) Saroj Nayyar, Kalinga University, India.

(3) Shahzadi, University of Balochistan, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (B Sridevi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Saroj Nayyar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Shahzadi, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Performance Evaluation of a Finned Solar Air Collector: Numerical and Experimental Investigation

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Natt Makul, Assistant Professor, Phranakhon Rajabhat University, Thailand.

Reviewers:

(1) Mandar Sumant, Drs Kiran & Pallavi Patel Global University, India.

(2) Ahmed H Yousif, Al-Furat Al-Awsat Technical University, Iraq.

(3) Faris Aissaoui, University of Ghardaia, Algeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.26/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mandar Sumant, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ahmed H Yousif, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Faris Aissaoui, Algeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: CRISPR/Cas9 Construct Development for Knock-out of Root Architecture Associated 1 Gene in Rice (Oryza sativa L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iram Liaqat, Associate Professor, Govt. College University, Lahore, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Yadla Hari, Professor Jayashankar Telangana Agricultural University (PJTAU), India.

(2) Itishree Nayak, ICAR-National Rice Research Institute, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Yadla Hari, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Itishree Nayak, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Effect of Foliar Application of Zinc, Potassium, and Boron on Fruit Set and Retention in Kinnow Mandarin

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Rajendra P. Maurya, Suresh Gyan Vihar University, India.

(2) Subrata Mahato, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rajendra P. Maurya, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Subrata Mahato, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Exploring the Horticultural Sector in Arunachal Pradesh, India: Status and Prospects

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, Tainan University of Technology, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Isela Quintero Zapata, Instituto De Biotecnología, Universidad Autónoma De Nuevo León, México.

(2) Md Ilias Hossain, Bangladesh Wheat and Maize Research Institute, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Isela Quintero Zapata, México) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Md Ilias Hossain, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v3_and_Feedback_v3 | File 1 | NA