Peer Review History: Impact of the Interaction between Meloidogyne javanica and Fusarium oxysporum on the Okra Plantation

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hakan Sevik, Kastamonu University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Aba-Toumnou Lucie, University of Bangui, Central African Republic.

(2) Mohamed Ahmed Gesraha, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) D. J. Patel, Anand Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Aba-Toumnou Lucie, Central African Republic) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Mohamed Ahmed Gesraha, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Unleashing the Potential of Millets Promoting Nutritious Grains as Vital Cereal Staples during the International Year of Millets: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Afroz Alam, Associate Professor, Banasthali University (accredited A grade by NAAC), P.O. Banasthali Vidyapith- 304 022 (Rajasthan), India.

(2) Dr. Ahmed Medhat Mohamed Al-Naggar, Professor of Plant Breeding, Cairo University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Lawrence Olusegun Ajala, Akanu Ibiam Federal Polytechnic, Nigeria.

(2) Tusneem Kausar, University of Sargodha, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) S. Sarvade, Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) José Carlos Fialho de Resende, Brazil.

(2) Kasahun Gudeta, Shoolini University, Ethiopia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Lawrence Olusegun Ajala, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Tusneem Kausar, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Response of Vermicompost and Neem Cake on Soil Health and Yield Attributes of Cluster Bean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba L.) var. Pusa Naubahar

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Afroz Alam, Associate Professor, Banasthali University (accredited A grade by NAAC), P.O. Banasthali Vidyapith- 304 022 (Rajasthan), India.

Reviewers:

(1) Udokang Anietie Edem, The Federal Polytechnic, Nigeria.

(2) Ignacio Carranza Cerda, Colegio de Postgraduados, México.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Imran Arshad, SAA Technical & Specialized Services Establishment, UAE.

(2) Shahira H. EL-Moslamy, Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology Research Institute (GEBRI), Egypt.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Udokang Anietie Edem, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Ignacio Carranza Cerda, México) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Bio-efficacy of Sulfentrazone 39.6% SC against Weed Flora of Soybean

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Valarmathi, Scientist, ICAR- Central Institute for Cotton Research, Coimbatore, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Lamin K M Fatty, University of The Gambia, School of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, The Gambia.

(2) Amilcar Isidro Servín Niz, Universidad Nacional de Concepción, Paraguay.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Lamin K M Fatty, The Gambia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Amilcar Isidro Servín Niz, Paraguay) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Influence of Row Ratio on Assessment of Yield and Economics of Wheat (Triticum aestivum) and Mustard (Brassica nigra) Intercropping System

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Pravallika Sree Rayanoothala, Assistant Professor, CV Raman Global University, Bubaneswar, Odisha, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Leonardo Ornella, Argentine.

(2) Ambreen Nabi, SKUAST-K, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Leonardo Ornella, Argentine) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Ambreen Nabi, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Aphrodisiac Potentials of Methanol Extract of Homalium letestui Root in Male Rats

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. K.V. Ramanath, Professor, Dayanand Sagar College of Pharmacy, Dayanand Sagar University( DSU), India.

Reviewers:

(1) Patrick Martin, Artois University, France.

(2) Monika Laxman Jadhav, SNDT Women’s University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Evelyn Sharon Sukumaran, Dr. MGR Educational and Research Institute, India.

(2) Rezza Ruzuqi, Marine and Fisheries Polytechnic of Sorong, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Patrick Martin, France) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Monika Laxman Jadhav, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Omental Cysts a Rare Intra-Abdominal Pathology: Two Case Reports

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ramesh Gurunathan, Sunway Medical Center, Malaysia.

Reviewers:

(1) Bogdan Ioan Stefanescu, “Dunarea De Jos” University of Galati, Romania.

(2) Surendra Ugale, Kirloskar Hospital, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Wajid Ali Chatha, Northern Border University, Pakistan.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Bogdan Ioan Stefanescu, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Surendra Ugale, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Nutritional Composition, Phytochemistry, and In vivo Potentials of Thaumatococcus daniellii (Benn.) Rhizome Extracts

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. S. Prabhu, Sri Venkateswara College of Engineering, Sriperumbudur, India.

Reviewers:

(1) T. AnithaHorticultural College and Research Institute, India.

(2) Mohini Chetan Kuchekar, Modern College of Pharmacy, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Amit Gupta, I B S, Dr. B R Ambedkar University, India.

(2) Farah Farhanah Haron, Malaysian Agricultural Research and Development Institute (MARDI), Malaysia.

(3) Lourdes Zumalacárregui de Cárdenas, Technological University of Havana, Cuba.

(4) Majid Mohammed Mahmood, Mustansiriyah University, Iraq.

(5) Rawa K. Ibrahim, Ministry of Science and Technology, Iraq.

(6) R. Saravanan, Dr. Ambedkar Government Arts College, India.

(7) Sonam Bhutia, Government Pharmacy College Sajong, Sikkim University, India.

(8) Vijay Singh, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Rajiv Dutta, Shobhit Institute of Engineering & Technology, Deemed University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (T. Anitha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Mohini Chetan Kuchekar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Pollution Assessment of Two Urban Soils in the City of Ngaoundere, Cameroon

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Wen-Cheng Liu, National United University, Miaoli, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Burcu Yeşilbudak, Çukurova University, Turkey.

(2) Ibtihaj Abdulwahhab Abdulrazzak, Al-Iraqia University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Dafil, Raymond Panshak, University of Jos, Nigeria.

(2) Simon Stephen Mshelia, Federal University Gashua, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) A. Agus Tjahjono, Semarang Merchant Marine Polytechnic, Indonesia.

(2) A. Kistan, Panimalar Engineering College, India.

(3) Albert Leandro Zeppelin Herrera, Universidad de Chile, Chile.

(4) G Anusha, KPR Institute of Engineering and Technology, India.

(5) Ivaní Souza Mello, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso, Cuiabá.

(6) Miguel Guzman-Rivero, Universidad Mayor de San Simón, Bolivia.

(7) Sugrive Reddy Adlagunvan, Rajiv Gandhi National Ground Water Training Institute, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Burcu Yeşilbudak, Turkey) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Ibtihaj Abdulwahhab Abdulrazzak, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Augmented Reality Instructional Strategy on Students’ Performance in ICT in Education Course, University of Calabar

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Veronica Mîndrescu, Transylvania University of Brasov, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Olufunmilayo D. Ayodele, Osun State University, Nigeria.

(2) John Janowiak, Appalachian State University, U.S.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ümit Özkanal, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Türkiye.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) S. Rajkumar, Institute of Technology, Hawassa University, Ethiopia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Olufunmilayo D. Ayodele, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (John Janowiak, U.S) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA