Author Archive: Managing Editor

Peer Review History: A Comprehensive Analysis of Stability and Data Dependency for a Novel Jungck-type Iterative Algorithm

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dariusz Jacek Jakóbczak, Assistant Professor, Koszalin University of Technology, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Kiranbhai Dodiya, Gujarat University, India.

(2) A. B. Sviridenko, Kuban State University, Russia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kiranbhai Dodiya, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (A. B. Sviridenko, Russia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Impact of Temporal Variability of Rainfall on Groundwater Quality of Dindigul District, India

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Daniele De Wrachien (Retired), The State University of Milan, Italy.

(2) Dr. Nitin Mishra, Assistant Professor, Graphic Era University, Dehradun, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Mahamat Nour Abdallah, University of N’Djamena, Chad.

(2) Kafando Halidou, School of Agriculture & Environmental Sciences, University of the Gambia, The Gambia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mahamat Nour Abdallah, Chad) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kafando Halidou, The Gambia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: The Interplay between Quasi-Matroid and Connectivity Systems

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Palle E. T. Jorgensen, The University of Iowa, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Lim Eng Aik, Institute of Engineering Mathematics, Universiti Malaysia Perlis, Malaysia.

(2) Karthiksankar. P, G. Venkataswamy Naidu College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Lim Eng Aik, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Karthiksankar. P, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Factors Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination among Pregnant Women in the Health District of Thies, Senegal

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Win Myint Oo, Associate Professor, Sibu Clinical Campus, SEGi University, Malaysia.

Reviewers:

(1) R. K. Saran, Government Agriculture College, Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

(2) Darlington David Faijue, Institute for Infection and Immunity, University of London, United Kingdom.

(3) Bahman Aghcheli, Gonabad University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (R. K. Saran, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Darlington David Faijue, United Kingdom) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Bahman Aghcheli, Iran) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Cost Benefit Analysis of Bale Mangrove Agroecotourism in East Lombok Regency

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Nebi Bilir, Isparta University of Applied Sciences, Turkey.

(2) Dr. Lucia Bortolini, Associate Professor, University of Padova, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) M. Adli Mohd Sidi, University of Malaya, Malaysia.

(2) August Daulat, Indonesia.

(3) Anubis Jorge Luis Vélez Mendoza, Institute of Marine Science Studies, National University of Colombia, Colombia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (M. Adli Mohd Sidi, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (August Daulat, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Anubis Jorge Luis Vélez Mendoza, Colombia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Intellectual Capital and the Performance of Public Listed State-owned Enterprises in the Digital Society Era

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Arzu Alvan Bozdereli, Associate Professor, Cyprus Science University, Cyprus.

Reviewers:

(1) Abhay Singh Chauhan, SVKM’s Narsee Monjee Institute of Management Studies, India.

(2) Bamidele Vincent Olawale, Federal College of Education, Nigeria.

(3) Md. Ashraful Alam, University of Rajshahi, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Abhay Singh Chauhan, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bamidele Vincent Olawale, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Md. Ashraful Alam, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Iron Status of Pregnant Women at Nsukka, Enugu State, South East Nigeria

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Anup Subhash Hendre, Assistant Professor, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Beenu Prajapati, ASMC, India.

(2) Sadaf Afzal, Riphah International University, Pakistan.

(3) Adegoke Olugbenga Adebayo, Madonna University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Beenu Prajapati, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sadaf Afzal, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Adegoke Olugbenga Adebayo, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Soil Organic Carbon Dynamics Across Various Land Use Systems Along Elevational Gradients in the North-eastern Himalayas

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sudip Sengupta, Assistant Professor, School of Agriculture, Swami Vivekananda University, West Bengal, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Mu’minah, Pangkep State of Agricultural Polytechnic, Indonesia.

(2) Dheerendra Singh, RNTU, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mu’minah, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Dheerendra Singh, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Identification of Potential Candida albicans Inhibitors Through Pharmacophore Modeling and Virtual Screening Techniques

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Farzaneh Mohamadpour, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) C. Naresh Babu, Raghavendra Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, India.

(2) Jyoti Prakash, Darbhanga Medical College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (C. Naresh Babu, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jyoti Prakash, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Enhancing Academic Performance in a Rural Private Primary School: Addressing COVID-19 Disruptions and Long-Term Challenges

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ridzwan Che Rus, Associate Professor, Sultan Idris Education University, Malaysia.

Reviewers:

(1) Ayesha Afzal, University of Management and Technology, Pakistan.

(2) Suvendu Ray, University of Kalyani, India.

(3) Elizer M. Rebucas, Tagum City College of Science and Technology Foundation Inc., Philippines.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ayesha Afzal, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Suvendu Ray, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Elizer M. Rebucas, Philippines) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA