Peer Review History: Compliance of Nutrient Claims with Nutrition Labelling Standards in Packaged Bakery Products

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Nguyen Van Toan, School of Biotechnology, Vietnam National University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.

Reviewers:

(1) B. Neeharika, ICAR-CTRI, India.

(2) Ateya Fathy Ateya Morsy, Al Azhar University, Egypt.

(3) Manal M. E. M. Shehata, Zagazig University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (B. Neeharika, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ateya Fathy Ateya Morsy, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Manal M. E. M. Shehata, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Antimicrobial Resistance Profile of Salmonella Enterica Isolated from Improved Poultry Breed Farming Chain, Maharashtra, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Konate Ibrahim, Jean University Lorougnon Guédé, Côte d’Ivoire.

Reviewers:

(1) Muhammad Tariq Zeb, Veterinary Research Institute, Pakistan.

(2) Matsyagandha Kishanrao Patil, COVAS, MAFSU, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Hadaf Hashem Mohammed, University of Baghdad – College of Veterinary Medicine, Iraq.

(2) Mohamad Reza Razavi, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Iran.

(3) Nchawa Yangkam Yhiler, Biaka University Institute of Buea, Cameroon.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Muhammad Tariq Zeb, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Matsyagandha Kishanrao Patil, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Epidemiological Studies on Various Weather Parameters for Development of Brown Spot Disease in Sugarcane

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iqtidar Hussain, Assistant Professor, Gomal University, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Hardik Jayswal, Charotar University of Science and Technology, India.

(2) S. Sudhasha, Tamilnadu Agricultural University, India.

(3) T. M. Hemalatha, Acharya N G Ranga Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.34/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hardik Jayswal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (S. Sudhasha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (T. M. Hemalatha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: An Evaluation of the Systemic Impact and Clinical Efficacy of Sequential Vincristine Sulfate Versus Doxorubicin in the Post-operative Management of Canine Mammary Tumours (CMT)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Tzasna Hernandez Delgado, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Shireen Rashid Mohammed, University of Zakho, Iraq.

(2) Gilberto Bastidas, Venezuela.

(3) Deepak Kumar Kashyap, Dau Shri Vashudev Chandrakar Kamdhenu Vishwavidyalya, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abdul Hafeez, M., M, Animal Health Research Institute, ARC, Egypt.

(2) Abubaker Ahmed Mohamed Ahmed Elayis, University of Bahri, Sudan.

(3) Hadaf Hashem Mohammed, University of Baghdad, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iraq.

(4) Le Huy Hai, Ho Chi Minh City Industry and Trade College (HITU), Vietnam.

(5) Matsyagandha Kishanrao Patil, COVAS, Udgir, MAFSU, India.

(6) Sukma Aditya Sitepu, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shireen Rashid Mohammed, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Gilberto Bastidas, Venezuela) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Deepak Kumar Kashyap, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Psychosocial Impacts of COVID-19 and 2014-16 Ebola Virus Disease Outbreaks on Australian – based West Africans: A Narrative Summary of Systematic Reviews

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Francisco Cruz-Sosa, Autonomous Metropolitan University, Mexico.

(2) Dr. Talha Bin Emran, Associate Professor, BGC Trust University Bangladesh, Chittagong, Bangladesh.

Reviewers:

(1) Chandramathy K, KMCT Medical College, India.

(2) Jyoti Prakash Sahoo, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

(3) Sandhya Basnet, Manmohan Memorial Institute of Health Sciences, Nepal.

(4) Tariq Mehmood, Central University of Kerala, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.62/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Chandramathy K, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jyoti Prakash Sahoo, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sandhya Basnet, Nepal) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Tariq Mehmood, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Challenges in Construction Technology Encountered by the Construction Consultancy Company in the Kingdom Bahrain

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Guang Yih Sheu, Associate Professor, Chang-Jung Christian University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Bukola Aluko-Olokun, Nigeria.

(2) Cristiams Yonel Diaz, “San Luis Gonzaga University”, Peru.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mohamed Shaban, AL-Baath University, Syria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bukola Aluko-Olokun, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Cristiams Yonel Diaz, Peru) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparative Effects of Organic Nutrient Sources on Green Gram (Vigna radiata L.) Quality and Soil Properties

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Lixiang Cao, Sun Yat-sen University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Rakesh K. Singh, University of Florida, United States of America.

(2) Sunil Kumar Prajapati, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Sunil Kumar, ICAR-IARI, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rakesh K. Singh, United States of America) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sunil Kumar Prajapati, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Genetic Profiling of Raoultella spp. in Pediatric Clinical Samples: Insights from Bauchi, North East Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Claudia Correia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Lavanya Balaji, Saveetha University, India.

(2) Madeeha Arshad, University of Education, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Lavanya Balaji, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Madeeha Arshad, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Unveiling T-Cell Prolymphocytic Leukaemia: A Comprehensive Case Study on Diagnostic Markers and Challenges

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Lomas Kumar Tomar, Galway University Hospital, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.

Reviewers:

(1) Nibras Saleam Al-Ammar, University of Basrah, College of Medicine, Iraq.

(2) May Mohammed Ali Hussen, Sudan University of Science and Technology, Sudan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abhilash Venunathan, Kerala University of Health Sciences, India.

(2) K.V.Sreedhara Babu, Sri Venkateswara Institute Of Medical Sciences, India.

(3) Marvis Ayoola Arowolo, University of Missouri, Usa.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nibras Saleam Al-Ammar, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (May Mohammed Ali Hussen, Sudan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Different Nitrogen Levels and Nano Urea on Yield and Economics of Wheat under Mid Hills of Himachal Pradesh, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Francisco Cruz-Sosa, Autonomous Metropolitan University, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Salih Kadhum Alwan Alsharifi, AlQasim Green University, Iraq.

(2) Merve Bayhan, Dicle University, Turkiye.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Garima Pathak, B.D. College, Patliputra University, India.

(2) Harmanpreet Singh, Punjab Agricultural University, India.

(3) Md. Shahadat Hossain Khan, Hajee Md. Danesh Science and Technology University, Bangladesh.

(4) Midde Sai Kumar, School of agricultural sciences, Malla Reddy university, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Salih Kadhum Alwan Alsharifi, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Merve Bayhan, Turkiye) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA