Peer Review History: Effect of Date of Sowing on Yield, Yield Attributes and Heat Use Efficiency of Brinjal in the Western Region of Haryana, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Afroz Alam, Associate Professor, Banasthali Vidyapith, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Pritam Prakash Patil, Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, India.

(2) Noluthabo Wawa, University of Limpopo, South Africa.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Pritam Prakash Patil, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Noluthabo Wawa, South Africa) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Application of Extreme Value Theory in Predicting Floods in Region 3, Zimbabwe

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Assistant Professor, Al-Quds Open University, Hebron Branch, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Ishtiak Mahmud, Center for Environmental and Geographic Information Services (CEGIS), Bangladesh.

(2) David Flores Vidriales, Institute of Engineering, UNAM, Mexico.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ishtiak Mahmud, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (David Flores Vidriales, Mexico) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Prevalence of Food Insecurity and the Principal Determinants in Tubah Health District, North West Cameron

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ghulam Khaliq, Associate Professor, Lasbela University of Agriculture, Water & Marine Sciences, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Gudisa Bereda, Ethiopia.

(2) Firew Hailemariam Mamo, Oda Bultum University, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Gudisa Bereda, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Firew Hailemariam Mamo, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Design, Development and Optimization of Polyherbal Powder Shampoo Using 32 Factorial Design

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Francisco Cruz-Sosa, Autonomous Metropolitan University, Mexico.

(2) Prof. Marcello Iriti, Milan State University, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Maheshvari Patel, India.

(2) Jaini K Patel, Sharda School of Pharmacy, India.

(3) V. Vaibhav, L.A.D. and Smt. R.P. College for Women, India.

(4) Bodepudi Sudhee Chowdary, Bapatla College of Pharmacy, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.87/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Maheshvari Patel, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jaini K Patel, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (V. Vaibhav, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Bodepudi Sudhee Chowdary, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Spatial Assessment of Soil Erosion and Aridity in Somalia Using the CORINE Model

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Wen-Cheng Liu, Distinguished Professor/Vice President, National United University (NUU), Taiwan, President of Taiwan Group on Earth Observations (TGEO), Taiwan.

(2) Dr. Alessandro Buccolieri, University of Salento, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) B. Lalmuanzuala, Agro Climate Research Centre, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

(2) Munir Hayet Khan, INTI International University, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (B. Lalmuanzuala, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Munir Hayet Khan, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Journal Change | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Thrips (Megalurothrips usitatus Bagnall) Infestation in Mung Bean: Integrated Control with Chemical and Neem-based Insecticides

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Gonzalo Emiliano Aranda Abreu, Veracruzana University, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Hamdi Shaaban  Abd El-Karim, Agricultural Research Center, Egypt.

(2) Kolli Bharghavi, Professor Jayashankar Telanagan Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hamdi Shaaban Abd El-Karim, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kolli Bharghavi, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparison of Femoral and Tibial Tunnel Widening after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Biostable and Bioabsorbable Interference Screws: A Radiographic Evaluation

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Midhun Krishnan, Associate Consultant, SK Hospital, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Sivakumar Singanallur Palanivelayutham, Ganga Medical Centre, India.

(2) Pradeep Choudhary, Dr SN Medical College, India.

(3) Asif Ali Shaikh, SMBB Medical University Larkana, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sivakumar Singanallur Palanivelayutham, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pradeep Choudhary, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Asif Ali Shaikh, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparative Assessment of Physicochemical and Bacteriological Parameters in Water Sources Near Major Dumpsites and Control Areas in Karu-Abuja and Parts of Nasarawa State

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohamed M. El Nady, Professor, Egyptian Petroleum Research Institute, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Yogita Ninama, GGTU, India.

(2) Bibi A. Bakari, Kenyatta University, Kenya.

(3) Abhijeet Das, C.V. Raman Global University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.26/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Yogita Ninama, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bibi A. Bakari, Kenya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Abhijeet Das, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of Occurrences of Low Back Pain among Health Care Workers in University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Erich Cosmi, Associate Professor, University of Padua, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Venkata Satyanarayana Nanduri, Yoga Prana Vidya Ashram, India.

(2) Nebert Mchidi, Kenyatta National Hospital, Kenya.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Venkata Satyanarayana Nanduri, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nebert Mchidi, Kenya) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Efficacy of High Dose Pulse Methylprednsiolone (Somidex) vs Oral Prednisolone for Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura in Rajavithi Hospital: Open Labelled Randomized Controlled Trial

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ashish Anand, William Carey School of Osteopathic Medicine, USA And Associate Professor, University of Mississipi Medical Center, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) D Raghunadharao, MNJ Institute of Oncology, India.

(2) Anju Prasad, Siksha O Anusandhan Ims & Sum Ii, India.

(3) Tahir Jameel, King Abdulaziz University Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.53/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (D Raghunadharao, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anju Prasad, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Tahir Jameel, Saudi Arabia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA