Peer Review History: Integrating Technology Platform with User Intention: How Binimoy Holds its Ground

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Chun-Chien Kuo, Associate Professor, National Taipei University of Business, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Debasis Patnaik, Birla Institute of Technology and Science, India.

(2) Vipin H, APJ Abdul Kalam Technological University, India.

(3) Maad M. Mijwil, Baghdad College of Economic Sciences University, Iraq.

(4) Hafiz Imtiaz Ahmad, Higher Colleges of Technology, UAE.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Hellena Mohamedy Mushi, Mzumbe University, Tanzania.

(2) Aymen Mudheher Badr, Diyala University, Iraq.

(3) Dimple, Aggarwal College Ballabgarh, India.

(4) Haitham Mohsin Kareem, Southern Technical University, Iraq.

(5) Matei Adrian Ducu, Athenaeum University, Romania.

(6) Praveen Bobby Binjha, Ravenshaw University, India.

(7) Sushma Malik, Institute of Innovation in Technology and Management, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.38/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Debasis Patnaik, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Vipin H, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Maad M. Mijwil, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_4 (Hafiz Imtiaz Ahmad, UAE) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Biofertilizers and Inorganic Fertilizers Application Impact on Available Nutrients in Soil of Kharif Maize

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Daniele De Wrachien, State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Essam Samir Soliman, Suez Canal University, Egypt.

(2) Zahid Anwar, University of Gujrat, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Khairy Abdel-Maksoud Mohamed Abada, Cairo University, Egypt.

(2) Mahfut, Lampung University, Indonesia.

(3) Muhamad Sabran, Indonesia.

(4) Munawar Fazal, College of Commerce, Arts & Science, Patliputra University, India.

(5) Nitin Misal, School of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, NMIMS, India.

(6) Paul Benyamin Timotiwu, University of Lampung, Indonesia.

(7) Sakka Samudin, Tadulako University, Indonesia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Essam Samir Soliman, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Zahid Anwar, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Genetic Variability and Path Analysis for Yield and Grain Yield Component Characters in Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Genotypes

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Daniele De Wrachien, State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Ratan Kumar Ganapati, Bangladesh Sugarcrop Research Institute, Bangladesh.

(2) Ghassen Abid, Centre of Biotechnology of Borj-Cedria, Tunisia.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ratan Kumar Ganapati, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Ghassen Abid, Tunisia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Emerging Weed Problems under Changing Climatic Condition: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Wen-Cheng Liu, National United University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Bryan Okoth Omondi, University of Eldoret, Kenya.

(2) Hermes Ulises Ramirez Sanchez, Universidad De Guadalajara, Mexico.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Bryan Okoth Omondi, Kenya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Hermes Ulises Ramirez Sanchez, Mexico) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Nano and Non-Nano Nutrients on Content, Uptake and NUE of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Muhammad Shehzad, Associate Professor, The University of Poonch Rawalakot AJK, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Nedjah Nawel, Annaba Higher School of Industrial Technology, Algeria.

(2) Hayder Azeez Ali Al-Shebly, Al-Furat Al-Awsat Technical, Iraq.

(3) Cicilia Novi Primiani, PGRI Madiun University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.67/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Nedjah Nawel, Algeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Hayder Azeez Ali Al-Shebly, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Cicilia Novi Primiani, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparison between DS, DSS and Triaxial Resistance Tests in Compacted Tropical Soils in the State of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Alessandro Buccolieri, University of Salento, Italy.

Reviewers: 

(1) Muhammad Syamsul Imran Zaini, College of Engineering, Universiti Malaysia Pahang, Malaysia.

(2) S. Suppiah, PMIST, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Atanaska Bosakova-Ardenska, University of Food Technologies, Bulgaria.

(2) Jianhui Yang, Henan Polytechnic University, P. R. China.

(3) Jiří Vala, Brno University of Technology, Czech Republic.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Muhammad Syamsul Imran Zaini, Malaysia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (S. Suppiah, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Study of Customer’s Preference towards Carbonated/ Non-Carbonated Beverages in India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Roxana Plesa, Senior Lecturer, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Asomaning Rudolph, Cape Coast Technical University, Ghana.

(2) Batrancea Larissa Margareta, Babes-Bolyai University, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) C.K.Gomathy, Sri Chandrasekharendra Saraswathi Viswa Mahavidyalaya, India.

(2) Oyerinde Oluyinka Moses, Nigeria.

(3) Umbas Krisnanto, Perbanas Institute, Indonesia.

(4) Upasana Gupta, Christ Deemed to be University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Asomaning Rudolph, Ghana) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Batrancea Larissa Margareta, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Sinusoidal PWM vs SVPWM for NPC Multilevel Inverter with Proportional Control Based Neutral Point Voltage Controller for Induction Motor Drive

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Guang Yih Sheu, Associate Professor, Chang-Jung Christian University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) N. Kalaiarasi, College of Engineering and Technology, SRMIST, India.

(2) Monaem Elmnifi, Bright Star University, Libya.

(3) Ezekiel Nnamere Aneke, Enugu State University of Science and Technology, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mona N. Eskander, Egypt.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (N. Kalaiarasi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Monaem Elmnifi, Libya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Ezekiel Nnamere Aneke, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Serum Ferritin as an Indicator of Neonatal Anaemia

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Juan Carlos Troiano, Professor, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Reviewers:

(1) Pradip Rameshbhai Chauhan, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

(2) Martha Orendu Oche Attah, Cyprus International University, Cyprus.

(3) Indranil Sen, Apollo Multispeciality Hospital, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Jonali Devi, SKUAST-J, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Pradip Rameshbhai Chauhan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Martha Orendu Oche Attah, Cyprus) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Indranil Sen, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Research on Equation 𝜑 (x)+2 = 𝜑 (x+2)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Doina Bein, Associate Professor, California State University Fullerton, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) S. Vidhya, Cauvery College for Women, India.

(2) Jalil Manafian, University of Tabriz, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (S. Vidhya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Jalil Manafian, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA