Peer Review History: Knowledge and Practice of Antimicrobial use for Treatment of Urinary Tract Infections among Female Medical Students in Enugu, Nigeria: A Cross-sectional Study

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Shankar Srinivasan, Rutgers – School of Health Professions, USA.

(2) Prof. Arthur V.M. Kwena, Associate Dean, School of Medicine, Moi University, Kenya.

Reviewers:

(1) Monika Sultana, Primeasia University, Bangladesh.

(2) Farah Amir Ali, Aziz Fatimah Medical & Dental College, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Farman Ali, Abbottabad University of Science & Technology, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Monika Sultana, Bangladesh) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Farah Amir Ali, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Prevalence of Hyperuricemia and Associated Factors in Gout Patients in Lebdosari Health Center, Semarang: A Cross-sectional Survey

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Juan Carlos Troiano, University of Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Reviewers:

(1) Noman-ul-Haq, University of Balochistan, Pakistan.

(2) Syam Sundar Junapudi, GMC, Mahabubabad, India.

(3) Alea Farhan Salman, Mustansiriyah   University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Tarek Hanfy Mahmoud, Deraya University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Noman-ul-Haq, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Syam Sundar Junapudi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Alea Farhan Salman, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: In vitro Study on Fungicide Sensitivity of Alternaria brassicicola for Managing Leaf Blight in Mustard (Brassica juncea)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Levent Son,  School of Silifke, Mersin University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Dhia Ahmed Taain, College of Agriculture, University of Basrah, Iraq.

(2) V. Madhuri, ANGRAU, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Dhia Ahmed Taain, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (V. Madhuri, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) Based Intercropping System under Varying Planting Patterns

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Afroz Alam, Associate Professor, Banasthali Vidyapith, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Gangadhar K, University of Agricultural Sciences, India.

(2) Yirsaw Hunegnaw Asres, Debre Markos University, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Gangadhar K, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Yirsaw Hunegnaw Asres, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Sustainable Use of Recycled Plastic and Coal Bottom Ash in the Development of Construction Material

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Wen-Cheng Liu, Distinguished Professor/Vice President, National United University (NUU), Taiwan, President of Taiwan Group on Earth Observations (TGEO), Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Yogeshwari B. Sonawane, COEP Technological University, India.

(2) Ghassan Khudhair Ismael, The University of Al-Qadisiyah, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Alinda Dey, Calcutta Institute of Technology, India.

(2) Aman Patidar, Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam University Institute of Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Yogeshwari B. Sonawane, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ghassan Khudhair Ismael, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Integrated Crop Management Practices for Maximizing the Productivity of Horse Gram

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, Tainan University of Technology, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Mukesh Chand Goyal, Agriculture University, India.

(2) Usman Muhammad Tukur, School of Metallurgy and Environment, Central South University, China.

(3) Polycarpe Feussi, College of Science, Engineering & Technology, University of South Africa, South Africa.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mukesh Chand Goyal, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Usman Muhammad Tukur, China) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Polycarpe Feussi, South Africa) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Therapeutic Applications and Multifaceted Benefits of Peppermint Oil in Medicine: A Mini-Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Saleha Sadeeqa, Head of Pharmacy, Lahore College for Women University, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Parin Salim Sidat, Gujarat Technological University, India.

(2) Shweta Ramakant Patil, MUHS, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Murtadha Ali Saleh Harz AL-Bakhati, Iraq.

(2) Ümmügülsüm Kaya, Sivas Cumhuriyet University, Türkiye.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Parin Salim Sidat, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shweta Ramakant Patil, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of Antibiotic Usage Patterns, Patient Factors, and Economic Implications in ICU

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Giuseppe Murdaca, University of Genoa, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Nure Ishrat Nazme, Combined Military Hospital, Bangladesh.

(2) Rachmad Syah, Andalas University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nure Ishrat Nazme, Bangladesh) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rachmad Syah, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Identification of Duplicates in Mulberry Germplasm Using Morphological Descriptors and SSR Markers

Editor(s):

(1) Department of Applied Technology and Management, School of Silifke, The University of Mersin, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Md. Masudur Rahman, Sylhet Agricultural University, Bangladesh.

(2) Sofia S, Fatima Mata National College (Autonomous), India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Md. Masudur Rahman, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sofia S, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Artificial Intelligence and Information Governance: Strengthening Global Security, through Compliance Frameworks, and Data Security

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Francisco Welington de Sousa Lima, Natural Sciences Center, Federal University of Piaui, Brazil Minister Petrônio Portella University Campus, Brazil.

(2) Dr. Dariusz Jacek Jakóbczak, Assistant Professor, Koszalin University of Technology, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Vamshi Bharath Munagandla, Northeastern University, USA.

(2) M. K. Ganeshan, Anna University, India.

(3) Morgan Nwaiku, Teesside University, United Kingdom.

(4) Adebimpe Ige, Canada.

(5) Pushkar Mehendale, United States.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Keyur Patel, IEEE – EMBS, USA.

(2) Olaide Awwal-Bolanta, Ekiti State University, Nigeria.

(3) Samreen Rizvi, India.

(4) Shankha Shubhra Goswami, Abacus Institute of Engineering and Management, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Vamshi Bharath Munagandla, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (M. K. Ganeshan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Morgan Nwaiku, United Kingdom) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Adebimpe Ige, Canada) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_5 (Pushkar Mehendale, United States) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA