Peer Review History: Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Various Ameliorant Sources in Increasing NP Absorption and Sweet Corn Productivity on Sandy Soil

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ioana Grozea, University of Life Sciences “King Mihai I” from Timisoara, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Khale Mohamed Abd El-Rheem, National Research Centre, Egypt.

(2) Apahidean Alexandru, University of Agricultural Science and Veterinary Medicine, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Khale Mohamed Abd El-Rheem, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Apahidean Alexandru, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Influence of Plant Spacing and NPK Fertilizers on Growth and Yield of Broccoli

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Champa Lal Khatik, Assistant Professor, Agricultural Research Station, Sri Karan Narendra Agriculture University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Mrutyunjay Padhiary, Assam University, India.

(2) Abdel-Monnem Sadalaha Kahlel, Technical Agricultural College, North Technical University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mrutyunjay Padhiary, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Abdel-Monnem Sadalaha Kahlel, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Extraction and Characterization of Pectin from Ripe Mango (Mangifera indica) Peel

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Nelson Pérez Guerra, Ourense Campus, University of Vigo, Spain.

Reviewers:

(1) M. Kumaresan, Vels Institutes of Science, Technology and Advanced Studies, India.

(2) Hridyesh Pandey, College of Food Processing Technology and Bio-Energy, Anand Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (M. Kumaresan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hridyesh Pandey, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Isolation and Characterization of Naga King Chilli Rhizobacteria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Laleh Naraghi, Iranian Research Institute of Plant Protection, Tehran, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Bahran Knfe Yakob, Rudn University, Eritrea.

(2) Nadeem Ahmed Ramadan, Al-Hadba University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bahran Knfe Yakob, Eritrea) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nadeem Ahmed Ramadan, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Vermicomposting and Its Role in Soil Health: A Comprehensive Review

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Levent Son, School of Silifke, Mersin University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) M. Mohan, Mahendra Engineering College, India.

(2) Vikash Kumar, BPSAC, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (M. Mohan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Vikash Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Bee Forage Tree Resources for Wild Honeybees: A Case Study from Kodagu’s Sacred Groves and Coffee Agroecosystems

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Surendra Singh Bargali, DSB Campus, Kumaun University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Gireesh Tripathi, Shri Krishna University, India.

(2) Praveenkumar C, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Gireesh Tripathi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Praveenkumar C, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Effect of Subcutaneous Wound Irrigation with Betadine Versus Normal Saline in Preventing Surgical Site Infections in Elective Surgeries: A Cross-sectional Comparative Study

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Abdelmonem Awad M. Hegazy, Zarqa University, Jordan.

Reviewers:

(1) Mehrangiz Ghabimi, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

(2) Javeria Usman, University College of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Lahore, Pakistan.

(3) Jayanth Nagendranath Chilkund, Pt Madan Mohan Malviya Shatabdi Hospital, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mehrangiz Ghabimi, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Javeria Usman, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Jayanth Nagendranath Chilkund, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 2 | NA


Peer Review History: Innovative Approaches to Bengal gram Yield Mapping: Integration of Sentinel-1 SAR and Crop Simulation Models for Precision Agriculture

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iqtidar Hussain, Assistant Professor, Gomal University, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Mrutyunjay Padhiary, Assam University, India.

(2) Suraj Mishra, Banda University of Agriculture & Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mrutyunjay Padhiary, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Suraj Mishra, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evolving Trends in Haryana’s Food Processing Sector: Growth, Structure, and Linkages

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ridzwan Che Rus, Associate Professor, Sultan Idris Education University, Malaysia.

Reviewers:

(1) Meduri Swapna Sree, Professor Jayashankar Telangana Agricultural University, India.

(2) Gagan Pal, School of Management and Labour Studies, Tata Institute of Social Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Meduri Swapna Sree, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Gagan Pal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Stress Management Techniques and Coping Strategies Mechanism of Teachers in the New Normal Education

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vlasta Hus, Associate Professor, University of Maribor, Koroška Cesta 160, Slovenia.

Reviewers:

(1) Sri Wahyuni, Universitas YPIB Majalengka, Indonesia.

(2) Ruth G. Luciano, Nueva Ecija University of Science and Technology, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sri Wahyuni, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ruth G. Luciano, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA