Peer Review History: The Impact of Antimicrobial Resistance on Co-INFECTIONS: Management Strategies for HIV, TB and Malaria

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. John Yahya I. Elshimali, UCLA School of Medicine, Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Ahmed Elsaid Ali Mostafa, Delta University for Science and Technology, Egypt.

(2) Osvaldo Antonio Franze, Argentina.

(3) Paushali Pal, Sri Shakthi Institute of Engineering and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ahmed Elsaid Ali Mostafa, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Osvaldo Antonio Franze, Argentina) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Paushali Pal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Study of Some Physico-chemical Parameters of Water Treated by Activated Carbon Based on Rhonier Fiber

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Assistant Professor, Al-Quds Open University, Hebron Branch, Abu Ktellah St., Hebron, Hebron, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Anatolii Semenov, Poltava State Agrarian University, Ukraine.

(2) A. Revathi, Kongu Engineering College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Khebizi Hafidha, National Higher School of Hydraulics (ENSH), Algeria.

(2) Jayaprakash M C, Mangalore Institute of Technology and Engineering, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Anatolii Semenov, Ukraine) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (A. Revathi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Potentials of Organic Cotton Farming to Smallholder Farmers’ Resilience Enhancement to Climate Change Adaptation in Semi-Arid Areas of Tanzania: A case of Meatu District

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Assistant Professor and HOD, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College, Karnataka, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Satya Narayan Satapathy, SOADU, India.

(2) S. Verma, National Institute of Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Satya Narayan Satapathy, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (S. Verma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of Nutritional Value and Sensory Analysis of a Composite Flour for Porridge and Biscuits Formulated by Four-Factor Mixing Plan

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. K.V. Ramanath, Principal, Rajeev College of Pharmacy, (Affiliated to RGUHS, Bangalore), India.

Reviewers:

(1) Majid Majeed, Pakistan.

(2) Ofoedum, Arinze Francis, School of Engineering & Engineering Technology, Federal University of Technology, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Majid Majeed, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ofoedum, Arinze Francis, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessing Abo and Kell Blood Group Phenotypes and Antigens in Donated Blood Units at University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Juan Carlos Troiano, University of Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Reviewers:

(1) Rakesh Sharma, Florida University, USA.

(2) K V Sreedhara Babu, Sri Venkateswara Institute Of Medical Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rakesh Sharma, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (K V Sreedhara Babu, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Mathematical Modelling of the Drying Kinetics of Clupea harengus from Congo

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Pradip K Bhowmik, University of Nevada Las Vegas, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Tigabu Mekonnen Belay, Addis Ababa Science and Technology University, Ethiopia.

(2) Thomas Aondofa Nyijime, Joseph Sarwuan Tarka University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Tigabu Mekonnen Belay, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Thomas Aondofa Nyijime, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Phytochemical Profile and Antibacterial Activity of Solid Residues from Hydrodistillation of Cymbopogon nardus from Burkina Faso

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Pradip K Bhowmik, University of Nevada Las Vegas, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Sanjeet Kumar, Ambika Prasad Research Foundation, India.

(2) Honey Jajo, Himalayan Pharmacy Institute, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ahmed Vandy, College of Medicine and Allied Health Sciences, University of Sierra Leone, Sierra Leone.

(2) A. Chandramohan, JCT College of Engineering and Technology, India.

(3) B.Bharathi, MMM College of Health Sciences, India.

(4) Chama Zouaouia, Djillali Liabes, Algeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sanjeet Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Honey Jajo, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Removal of Residual Phosphorus and Nitrates from Sewage Treatment Plants by a Fine Sand Filter

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. A.V. Raghu, Coordinator, BLDE Deemed-to-be University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Arnold Rafiq, Elizabeth School of London, United Kingdom.

(2) Matthew Adah Onu, University of Johannesburg, South Africa.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Arnold Rafiq, United Kingdom) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Matthew Adah Onu, South Africa) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Health Status and Demographic Characteristics of Patients Attending a Primary Care Unit in Mexico City: A Descriptive Study

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ashish Anand, William Carey School of Osteopathic Medicine, USA And University of Mississipi Medical Center, Mississipi, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) T. Tamilselvan, Nehru College of Pharmacy, India.

(2) David Otieno Odongo, Masinde Muliro University of  Science and Technology, Kenya.

(3) Sara Shahid, Lahore University of Biological & Applied Sciences, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Asma Ejaz, Australia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (T. Tamilselvan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (David Otieno Odongo, Kenya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sara Shahid, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effects of Compost Biomass Using Mango (Mangifera indica) Combined with Popularized Mineral Manure on Soil Chemical Parameters and Maize (Zea mays L.) Yield in Western Burkina Faso

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jakub Kostecki, Assistant Professor, University of Zielona Góra, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Abraham E. Sunday, Akwa Ibom State University, Nigeria.

(2) Karel Iaroslav Lato, University of Life Sciences “King Mihai I” from Timişoara, Romania.

(3) Salahaddin Abdulqadir Aziz, University of Sulaimani, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Abraham E. Sunday, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Karel Iaroslav Lato, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Salahaddin Abdulqadir Aziz, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA