Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Aleksey Khlopytskyi, Associate Professor, Ukrainian State University of Chemical Technology, Ukraine.

Reviewers:

(1) Amit Yadav, AKTU, India.

(2) Kotha Kalyan Kumar, Teegala Krishna Reddy Engineering College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Amit Yadav, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kotha Kalyan Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chun-Chien Kuo, National Taipei University of Business, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Emmanuel Joel, Federal University Wukari, Nigeria.

(2) Niti goyal, IGN college, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Emmanuel Joel, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Niti goyal, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Daniele De Wrachien, Retired Professor, The State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Ashish Anand, Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

(2) G. K. Bhabhor, Anand Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ashish Anand, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (G. K. Bhabhor, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Chan-Min Liu, School of Life Science, Xuzhou Normal University, Xuzhou City, PR China.

Reviewers:

(1) Bilal Ahmad, Islamia University, Pakistan.

(2) Aditi Goyal, SNDT Women’s University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bilal Ahmad, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Aditi Goyal, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinoth Prabhu Veeramani, Assistant Professor, University of Tabuk, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Reviewers:

(1) Mohamed Elsadeg Ahmed Hussein, University of Khartoum, Sudan.

(2) Emmanuela Tochukwu Chukwuma, Steduron College of Health Technology, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bora Ekinci, Mugla Sitki Kocman University, Turkey.

(2) Abdelrazak Mansour Ali, Al-Azhar University, Egypt.

(3) Magda A. Ali, Wasit University, Iraq.

(4) Jude E. Enoh, Institute of Medical Research and Medicinal Plants Studies, Cameroon.

(5) Lakshmi Prasanthi Nori, Shri Vishnu College of Pharmacy, India.

(6) Gerardo Arroyo Catalán, Universidad de San Carlos de Guatemala, Guatemala.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mohamed Elsadeg Ahmed Hussein, Sudan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Emmanuela Tochukwu Chukwuma, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Rameshwari Thakur, Muzaffarnagar Medical College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Josue Eduardo Betancourth- Alvarenga, Consorci Corporacio Sanitaria Parc Tauli Sabadell, Spain.

(2) Muhammad Amir Hanif Khan, The Children Hospital, The Institute of Child health, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Josue Eduardo Betancourth- Alvarenga, Spain) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Muhammad Amir Hanif Khan, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Jacek Dziok, Institute of Mathematics, University of Rzeszow, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Elvir Čajić, University Tuzla, European University Kallos, Bosnia and Herzegovina.

(2) Pragnesh Kumar R. Makwana, P. D. Patel Institute of Applied Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) M. Sumathi, N.M.S.S.Vellaichamy Nadar College, India.

(2) Tahereh Jabbari Khanbehbin, Gonbad Kavous University, Iran.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Elvir Čajić, Bosnia and Herzegovina) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pragnesh Kumar R. Makwana, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Claudia Correia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Mehmet Veysi Cetiz, Harran University, Turkey.

(2) Muhammad Waseem, University College of Medicine and Dentistry, University of the Lahore, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Borozan Aurica, University of Life Sciences “King Mihai I”, Romania.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mehmet Veysi Cetiz, Turkey) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Muhammad Waseem, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Niranjalie Perera, Wayamba University of Sri Lanka, Sri Lanka.

Reviewers:

(1) Khaled Hassan Mohammed Mohammed Abdel-Rheim, Plant Protection Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Egypt.

(2) Ram Krishna Neupane, Nepal.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Khaled Hassan Mohammed Mohammed Abdel-Rheim, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ram Krishna Neupane, Nepal) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Maria Serrano, University Miguel Hernandez, Orihuela, Alicante, Spain.

Reviewers:

(1) Vinay Verma, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, India.

(2) Sturzeanu Monica, RIFG, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Vinay Verma, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sturzeanu Monica, Romania) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA