Peer Review History: Formulation and Evaluation of Paracetamol Tablet Using Konjac Glucomannan as Natural Halal Binder

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Aurora Martinez Romero, Juarez University, Durango, Mexico.

(2) Prof. John Yahya I. Elshimali, Adjunct Professor, UCLA School of Medicine & Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science, California, USA.

(3) Prof. Bu Lang Gao, Shijiazhuang First Hospital, Hebei Medical University, China and Shanghai Jiaotong University Renji Hospital, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Vedamurthy Joshi, Adichunchanagiri University, India.

(2) Lakshmi Usha Ayalasomayajula, Maharajah’s College of Pharmacy, India.

(3) Harish, VIT University, India.

(4) Rajeshwari Satish Patil, R. C. Patel Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Hemant H. Gangurde, Savitribai Phule Pune University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Vedamurthy Joshi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Lakshmi Usha Ayalasomayajula, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Harish, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Rajeshwari Satish Patil, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Lassa Fever Insights: Epidemiology, Metabolism, Pharmacokinetics of Ribavirin, Mechanisms against Arenaviruses and its Novel Application in the Future

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Aurora Martínez, RomeroJuarez University, Durango, Mexico.

(2) Dr. Giuseppe Murdaca, University of Genoa, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Salauddin Al Azad, School of Biotechnology, Jiangnan University, China.

(2) Mehvish Saleem Shah, Sher-I-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

(3) Kalyana Ramu Buridi, Visakha Government Degree College (A) For Women, India.

(4) Sapna Singh, Teerthanker Mahaveer University, India.

(5) Ehimen Ferguson, Ose-Care Consultancy Services and Research Centre, United Kingdom.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Fatemeh Farshadpour, Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

(2) C. Shobana, Vels Institute of Science, India.

(3) Omar Hussein Ahmed, Tikrit University College of Pharmacy, Iraq.

(4) M.Senthilraja, The TN Dr MGR Medical University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.42/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Salauddin Al Azad, China) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mehvish Saleem Shah, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Kalyana Ramu Buridi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Sapna Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_5 (Ehimen Ferguson, United Kingdom) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Machine Learning-enabled Smart Sensors for Real-time Industrial Monitoring: Revolutionizing Predictive Analytics and Decision-making in Diverse Sector

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Francisco Welington de Sousa Lima, Natural Sciences Center, Federal University of Piaui, Brazil Minister Petrônio Portella University Campus, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Ankur Jain, National Institute of Technology, India.

(2) Sibo Cheng, Imperial College London, United Kingdom.

(3) Dhaval Ramanlal Kher, Dr.V.R.Godhaniya I.T.College, India.

(4) S Poorna Chander Rao, Dr.V.R.Godhaniya I.T.College, Porbandar, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mehdi Jelo Marie Al-Shimmary, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ankur Jain, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sibo Cheng, United Kingdom) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Dhaval Ramanlal Kher, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (S Poorna Chander Rao, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Cheetah Reintroduction in India: Review of Eco-restoration Policy Gaps

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Osama Anwer Saeed, Assistant Professor, College of Agriculture, University of Anbar, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Aouadj Sid Ahmed, Relizane University & LEGEN 13 Tlemcen, Algeria.

(2) Taye Lemma Geleta, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Aouadj Sid Ahmed, Algeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Taye Lemma Geleta, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: New Therapeutic Approaches in the Management and Outcomes of Pediatric Asthma

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Nicolás Padilla-Raygoza, Institute of Public Health from Guanajuato State, México.

Reviewers:

(1) Bharat W Tekade, University of Mumbai, India.

(2) Swapnil Bodke, University of Mumbai, India.

(3) Deepak Raj Paudel, Rapti Academy of Health Science, Nepal.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Vishal Sharad Bodke, University of Mumbai, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bharat W Tekade, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Swapnil Bodke, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Deepak Raj Paudel, Nepal) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: English Language Proficiency and Communicative Competence among Graduate Students in Bicol Region, Philippines: A Foundation for English Language Enhancement Program Development

Editor(s):

(1) Prof.  Dennis Gamad Caballes, De La Salle-College Of Saint Benilde, Philippines.

Reviewers:

(1) Nirumala Rothinam, India.

(2) Princess L. Varona, Saint Michael College of Caraga, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nirumala Rothinam, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Princess L. Varona, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Peer Review History: Perceptions of First Language Usage and its Effect on Student Achievement in English Language Learning

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Dennis Gamad Caballes, De La Salle-College of Saint Benilde, Philippines.

Reviewers:

(1) David Sandeman, University of Portsmouth, England.

(2) Pham Ngoc Truong Linh, Hoa Sen University, Vietnam.

(3) Md. Obaidullah, Northern University of Business and Technology, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) B. Anita Virgin, Karunya Institute of Technology and Sciences, India.

(2) Imran Nazeer, University of Gujrat, Pakistan.

(3) Thompson O. Ewata, University of Africa, Toru-Orua, Nigeria.

(4) Yousuf Taresh Hilal Jabur Al Amaya, University of Gezira, College of Arts and Human Sciences, Sudan.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (David Sandeman, England) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pham Ngoc Truong Linh, Vietnam) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Md. Obaidullah, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Survey and Analysis of Implementation Status of Science and Technology Mini Projects Course in Middle School

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Akbar Azizifar, Associate Professor, School of Medicine, Ilam University of Medical Sciences, Ilam, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Joel B. Faustino, College of Education, Bulacan State University, Philippines.

(2) Frederick F. Patcsil, Pangasinan State University, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Joel B. Faustino, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Frederick F. Patcsil, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Fluctuations in India’s GDP and Manufacturing Output: An Analytical Approach

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Meryem Altun Ekiz, Associate Professor, Hatay Mustafa Kemal University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Waqar Khalid, National University of Sciences and Technology, Pakistan.

(2) Imran Ali, National Research University, Higher School of Economics, Russia.

(3) Abubakar El-Sidig Ali Ahmed Mahdi, Sudan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Doan Van Dinh, Industrial University of Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Waqar Khalid, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Imran Ali, Russia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Abubakar El-Sidig Ali Ahmed Mahdi, Sudan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Customer Relationship Management on Customer Retention in the SACCO Sector in Kenya

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rakesh Verma, Associate Professor, GNIOT MBA Institute, UP, AKTU Lucknow (AICTE), India.

Reviewers:

(1) Saleh Md Arman, Poznan University of Economics and Business, Poland.

(2) Jagjot Bhardwaj, USA.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Previledge G. Madhovi, Tshwane University of Technology (TUT), South Africa.

(2) Dipti Baghel, Dr. K.C. Baghel Govt PG College, India.

(3) Sudhinder Singh Chowhan, IIHMR University, India.

(4) Roya Anvari, The University of Georgia, Georgia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Saleh Md Arman, Poland) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jagjot Bhardwaj, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA