Peer Review History: Foreign Direct Investment and Growth in ECOWAS: An ARDL Panel Analysis

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Alfredo Jimenez Palmero, Kedge Business School, France.

(2) Prof. Choi Sang Long, Raffles University Iskandar, Malaysia.

(3) Prof. Chun-Chien Kuo, National Taipei University of Business, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) David Umoru, Edo State University, Nigeria.

(2) Fidlizan Muhammad, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ndivhuho Eunice Ratombo, University of Limpopo, South Africa.

(2) Dennis Amponsah Baidoo, Atlantic International University, Ghana.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (David Umoru, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Fidlizan Muhammad, Malaysia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Morphological Characterization of Cytoplasmic Male Sterile Lines with their Respective Maintainers in Cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Lixiang Cao, Sun Yat-sen University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Niraj Kumar Prajapati, Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University, India.

(2) P. Ranchana, Karunya Institute of Technology and Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Solanki Bal, Adamas University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Niraj Kumar Prajapati, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (P. Ranchana, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Narrative Review on Emerging Technologies in Medicine: Opportunities and Challenges in Modern Healthcare

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Erich Cosmi, Chair & Director, University of Padua, School of Medicine, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Jayendra Jadhav, Vishwakarma University, India.

(2) Jyoti Sunil More, Fr. C. Rodrigues Institute of Technology, India.

(3) Muhammad Umer Farooq Mujahid, University of Health Sciences, Pakistan.

(4) Gaurav Kumar, United State.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jayendra Jadhav, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jyoti Sunil More, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Muhammad Umer Farooq Mujahid, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Gaurav Kumar, United State) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Screening of Mango Varieties against Anthracnose Diseases Caused by Colletotrichum gloeosporioides and Its In vitro Management through Biocontrol Agents and Fungicides

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohammed Jard Kadhim, Assistant Professor, Al- Furat Al- Awsat Technical University, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Bhagyashree Bhatt, Shoolini University, India.

(2) Ranapratap Anaji Raut, Dr. BSKKV., India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bhagyashree Bhatt, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ranapratap Anaji Raut, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Integrated Nutrient Management for Improving the Soil Sustainability and Crop Productivity: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, Tainan University of Technology, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Jay Nath Patel, Abhilashi University, India.

(2) Indra Raj Yadav, College of Agriculture, Rajmata Vijayaraje Sciendia Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Akanchha Singh, GLA University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jay Nath Patel, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Indra Raj Yadav, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Study of Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohammed Jard Kadhim, Assistant Professor, Al- Furat Al- Awsat Technical University, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Hayyawi Wewa Attia Al-Juthery, Unervetsity of Al-Qadisiyah, Iraq.

(2) Mandeep Kumar Diwakar, Chandra Shekhar Azad University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hayyawi Wewa Attia Al-Juthery, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mandeep Kumar Diwakar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessing Different Rice Genotypes Tolerance against the Major Pests and Identifying the Biochemical Basis of Tolerance

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Tsygankova Victoria Anatolyivna, Senior Staff Scientist & Principal Researcher, Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry and Petrochemistry, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine.

Reviewers:

(1) Mihir Rabha, Central Sericultural Research and Training Institute, India.

(2) Vipin Kumar Pandey, Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mihir Rabha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Vipin Kumar Pandey, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Maternal Mortality and Contributing Factors in Some Rural Communities of Bayelsa State, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sevgul Donmez, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Qasim Abbas Khyoosh Al-Eqabi, Kut Technical Institute, Middle Technical University, Iraq.

(2) Mohammed Talib Abed, University of Babylon, College of Nursing, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Qasim Abbas Khyoosh Al-Eqabi, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mohammed Talib Abed, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of the Alterations in Haematological Parameters of Cervical Cancer Subjects in Port Harcourt

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Armel Hervé Nwabo Kamdje, Assistant Professor, University of Ngaoundere, Cameroon.

Reviewers:

(1) Nicolae Bacalbasa, Carol Davila Univeristy of Medicine and Pharmacy, Romania.

(2) T.M.Vijayalakshmi, University of Madras, India.

(3) Dumitru Gabriela, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Kamdev Sethy, OUAT, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nicolae Bacalbasa, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (T.M.Vijayalakshmi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Dumitru Gabriela, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Enhancing Growth and Nutrient Use Efficiency in Potato (cv. Kufri Pushkar) through Nano Urea and Zinc Sulfate Application in Haryana, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Al-Quds Open University, Hebron Branch, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Husam Mohammed Muhi, University of Diyala, Iraq.

(2) Suhail Quyoom Wani, SKUAST-Kashmir, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Husam Mohammed Muhi, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Suhail Quyoom Wani, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA