Peer Review History: Influence of Nutrient and Weed Management on Growth, Yield and Energetics of Maize

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Kwong Fai Andrew Lo, Professor & Dean, Institute of Earth Science, College of Science Chinese Culture University, Taipei, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Rose Mayoli, Kenya Agricultural & Livestock Organization, Kenya.

(2) Irfan Martiansyah, National Research and Innovation Agency, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Dennis Owusu Boateng, Cocoa Health & Extension Division, Ghana.

(2) Bilter A. Sirait, Indonesia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Rose Mayoli, Kenya) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Irfan Martiansyah, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Rigorous Analysis of a 26-GHz hybrid SIW coupler with Mode Matching Technique

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Guang Yih Sheu, Associate Professor, Chang-Jung Christian University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Mekala Harinath Reddy, Printech Circuit Laboratories, United Kingdom.

(2) Gabriel Gomes De Oliveira, UNICAMP/FEEC, Brazil.

(3) Rajashree Narendra, Dayananda Sagar University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Amara Yasmine, University Saad Dahleb of Blida, Algeria.

(2) André Felippe Vieira da Cunha, Federal University of Pernambuco (UFPE), Brazil.

(3) Archana Dattatray Jadhav, S. P. P. University Pune, India.

(4) Alexander G. Yushchenko, National Technical University, Ukraine.

(5) Vinícius José Oliveira Werneck de Carvalho, UFRJ, Brazil.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Mekala Harinath Reddy, United Kingdom) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Gabriel Gomes De Oliveira, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Rajashree Narendra, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Energy and Spectral Efficiency Optimization Methods in 5G Massive Mimo Systems

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohd Zuki Salleh, Professor, Centre for Mathematical Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Pahang, Malaysia.

Reviewers:

(1) Gabriel Gomes De Oliveira, UNICAMP, Brazil.

(2) Amara Yasmine, Saad Dahleb of BLIDA, Algeria.

(3) Hui Yang, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications (BUPT), China.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Gabriel Gomes De Oliveira, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Amara Yasmine, Algeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Hui Yang, China) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised MS v2 and Feedback v2 | File 1 | File 2


Peer Review History: Is Defibrotide Prophylaxis Effective on Graft Versus Host Disease in Patients with Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation?

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Davina Hijam, Regional Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Nidhi Dikshit, School of Tropical Medicine, India.

(2) Amit Gupta, Dr. B R Ambedkar University, India.

(3) Woldeteklehaymanot Kassahun, Woldia University, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Amged Hussien Abdelrahman, Omdurman Islamic University, Republic of Sudan.

(2) Jamila Elhoudzi, CHUMohmaed VI Marrakech, Morocco.

(3) Meera Sikka, Delhi University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.50/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Nidhi Dikshit, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Amit Gupta, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Woldeteklehaymanot Kassahun, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Response of Integrated Nutrient Management on Irrigated Wheat

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Francisco Cruz-Sosa, Metropolitan Autonomous University Iztapalapa Campus, Av. San Rafael Atlixco 186 México City, México.

Reviewers:

(1) Alireza Ala, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

(2) Hammad Ahmad Jan, University of Buner, Pakistan.

(3) Trần Thị Ngọc Lan, Forest Science Institute of Central Highlands and South of Central Vietnam, Vietnam.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Alireza Ala, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Hammad Ahmad Jan, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Trần Thị Ngọc Lan, Vietnam) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Studies on Genetic Association and Path Coefficient Analysis for Yield and Yield Attributing Characters in Maize (Zea mays L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ahmed Medhat Mohamed Al-Naggar, Professor, Cairo University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Justin R Nayagam, Union Christian College, India.

(2) K. Selvam, Mahendra Arts and Science College (Autonomous), India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Justin R Nayagam, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (K. Selvam, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Weed Management Practices and Bio- fertilizers with and without FYM on Weed Flora, Growth and Yield of Blackgram (Vigna mungo L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ahmed Medhat Mohamed Al-Naggar, Professor, Cairo University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) G. Kranthi Kumar, Maris Stella College, India.

(2) Joseph Kipkorir Cheruiyot, University of Kabianga, Kenya.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (G. Kranthi Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Joseph Kipkorir Cheruiyot, Kenya) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Neurological and Molecular Interactions of Phytoconstituents from Ricinus communis Root Extract- A Pharmacological and Computational Approach

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Rotaru Luciana Teodora, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Romania.

(2) Cirimbei Ciprian, Bucharest Institute of Oncology, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Enrico Pessina, ASL CN2, Italy.

(2) Long Niu, Dalian Medical University, China.

(3) Sina Dindarian, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Iran

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Rotaru Luciana Teodora, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Cirimbei Ciprian, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Bisphenol A Disrupt Endogenous Estrone, Estriol and Estradiol Levels in Female Albino Wistar Rats

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Halit Demir, Professor, Yil University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Hasanain Abdulhameed Odhar, Al-Zahrawi University College, Iraq.

(2) Anup S Hendre, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences Deemed To Be University, India.

(3) Hayder H. Abed, Al Muthanna University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Hasanain Abdulhameed Odhar, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Anup S Hendre, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Hayder H. Abed, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Moisture Content on Physical Properties of Groundnut Seed for Planter Development

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Wen-Cheng Liu, Professor, National United University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Dharmendra Sapariya, Indus University, India.

(2) Vijay Kumar, Abes Institute of Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Idowu Olugbenga Adewumi, Federal College of Agriculture, Nigeria.

(2) Raheel Muzzammel, University of Lahore, Pakistan.

(3) Salih Kadhum Alwan Alsharifi, AlQasim Green University, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Dharmendra Sapariya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Vijay Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA