Peer Review History: Management of Intra-Cavernous Foreign Bodies: Case Report

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Giuseppe Murdaca, University of Genoa, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Okeke Chike John, Alex-Ekwueme Federal University Teaching Hospital, Nigeria.

(2) Farhad Abbasi, Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Okeke Chike John, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Farhad Abbasi, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of Accentuated Pre-loved Dress using Apayao Woven Textiles

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Atila Yildirim, Associate Professor, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Shatrajit Goswami, Institute of Advanced Education and Research, India.

(2) Md. Eanamul Haque Nizam, University of Zagreb, Bangladesh.

(3) Xinwang Cao, Wuhan Textile University, China.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Shatrajit Goswami, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Md. Eanamul Haque Nizam, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Xinwang Cao, China) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Verification of Fascial Fissure Direction at the Port-site: the Search for a Reliable Closure Method

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ashish Anand, Assistant Professor, GV Montgomery Veteran Affairs Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi, USA, and William Carey School of Osteopathic Medicine,  Hattiesburg, Mississippi, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Oluwafemi Olasupo Awe, Ambrose Alli University, Nigeria.

(2) S. Kamatchi, Jeppiaar Institute of Technology, Anna University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Oluwafemi Olasupo Awe, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (S. Kamatchi, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of Cosmobiological Factors on Chromosomal Anomalies Rates – Ethical Consideration

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dean Markic, Assistant Professor, University Hospital Rijeka, Croatia.

Reviewers:

(1) Mubashir Zafar, Ziauddin University, Pakistan.

(2) Basil A. Abbas, University of Basrah, Iraq.

(3) Amol Kalyanrao Joshi, Government Medical College, India.

(4) Selvi Radhakrishnan, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research (SRIHER), Deemed University, India.

(5) Akhileshwar Kumar Srivastava, CFTRI, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Mubashir Zafar, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Basil A. Abbas, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Amol Kalyanrao Joshi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_4 (Selvi Radhakrishnan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_5 (Akhileshwar Kumar Srivastava, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Morphopathological Study on Ovine Pulmonary Adenocarcinoma in Libya

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Mostafa Abbas Shalaby, Cairo University, Egypt.

(2) Thaís Van Den Broek Campanelli, University of São Paulo (USP), Brazil.

(3) Luca Iasmina, Banat University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Romania.

(4) Ioana Grozea, Banat’s University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Mostafa Abbas Shalaby, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Thaís Van Den Broek Campanelli, Brazil) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Luca Iasmina, Romania) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_4 (Ioana Grozea, Romania) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Performance Evaluation of Coccinia (Coccinia grandis L. Voigt) under Different Training Systems and Growing Environments

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Al-kazafy Hassan Sabry, Professor, National Research Centre, Cairo, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Ravi Ranjan Kumar, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

(2) Mohammad Quamrul Islam Matin, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute (BARI), Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ravi Ranjan Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Mohammad Quamrul Islam Matin, Bangladesh) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Balanced Fertilization in Rice-maize Cropping System to Enhance Productivity, Economics and Soil Fertility Status in North Coastal Zone, Andhra Pradesh

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Muhammad Shehzad, The University of Poonch Rawalakot, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Abhisek Shrestha, Agriculture and Forestry University, Nepal.

(2) Muayed Fadhil Abbas, Basrah University College of Agriculture, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Evy Latifah, Indonesia.

(2) Hudhaifa Maan AL-Hamandi, Tikrit University, Iraq.

(3) Iqtidar Hussain, Gomal University, Pakistan.

(4) Juan José Aparicio Porres, Universidad Mayor de San Andrés, Bolivia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Abhisek Shrestha, Nepal) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Muayed Fadhil Abbas, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Research Review of Agricultural Product Traceability System Based on Blockchain Technology

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ivan Markovic, University of Nis, Serbia.

(2) Dr. A. K. M. Ahasanul Haque, Professor, Kuliyyah of Economics and Management Sciences, International Islamic University, Malaysia.

(3) Dr. Chun-Chien Kuo, Associate Professor, National Taipei University of Business, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Slim Chtioui, FSEG SFAX, Tunisia.

(2) Rupesh Rastogi, Dr. A. P.J. Abdul Kalam Technical University, India.

(3) Randhir Kumar, Indian Institute of Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ashok Chopra, Amity University Dubai, United Arab Emirates.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Slim Chtioui, Tunisia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Rupesh Rastogi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Randhir Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA