Peer Review History: Breeding for Pest and Disease Tolerance High Yielding Variety (DHLM-36-3-1) in Little Millet (Panicum sumetrense. L)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Mohammed Jard Kadhim, Assistant Professor, Al- Furat Al- Awsat Technical University, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Asad Rajput, Sindh Agriculture University, Pakistan.

(2) Sunita Rawat, Government Degree College, C.S.J.M. University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) D.Sheema, Sathyabama Institute of Science and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Asad Rajput, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sunita Rawat, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Optimizing Nutrient Management for Enhanced Performance in Kadiri Lepakshi Groundnut

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hayder Ali Mohammed, Assistant Professor, Veterinary Medicine College, University of Kerbala, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Guillermo Martín Caille, National University of Patagonia San Juan Bosco (UNPSJB), Argentina.

(2) Prashant Shrivastava, Jawaharlal Nehru Agriculture University, Indian.

(3) Che Jane Nchangnwi, University of Buea, Cameroon.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Nabeel Kh. Al-Ani, Al-Nahrain University, Iraq.

(2) Seyyed Akbar Sadaty, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Guillermo Martín Caille, Argentina) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Prashant Shrivastava, Indian) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Che Jane Nchangnwi, Cameroon) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Chemical Quality Parameters of Mandarin (Citrus reticulata Blanco.) Fruits Influenced by different Organic Sources

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Maria Serrano, University Miguel Hernandez, Orihuela, Spain.

Reviewers:

(1) Ahmed El-Sayed Ismail, National Research Center, Egypt.

(2) Kumari Karuna, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

(3) Amandeep Ranjan, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ahmed El-Sayed Ismail, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kumari Karuna, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Amandeep Ranjan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Haematological Profiles in Apparently Healthy Male Kombai Dogs in Theni District, Tamil Nadu

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iram Liaqat, Associate Professor, Govt. College University, Lahore, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Razvan Nicolae Malancus, “Ion Ionescu de la Brad” Iasi University of Life Sciences, Romania.

(2) Avinash K. Bilwal, College of Veterinary Science & Animal Husbandry, Kamdhenu University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Basima Abdulfatah Albadrani, University of Mosul, Iraq.

(2) Raguvaran R, ICAR-IVRI, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Razvan Nicolae Malancus, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Avinash K. Bilwal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Natural Feed Options for Sumatran Elephants at the Seblat Elephant Training Center North Bengkulu Regency, Indonesia

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Anil Kumar, Head (Retired), School of Biotechnology, Devi Ahilya University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Tulishree Pradhan, KIIT School of Law, KIIT Deemed University, India.

(2) Dharmendra Chharang, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ruchira Nigam, University of Lucknow, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Tulishree Pradhan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Dharmendra Chharang, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Rice Production in Water-Scarce Environments: A Review of Conservation Agriculture Techniques

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Tsygankova Victoria Anatolyivna, Senior Staff Scientist & Principal researcher, Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry and Petrochemistry, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine.

Reviewers:

(1) Damte Balcha Gadana, Wolaita Sodo University –Dawro Tarcha Campus, Ethiopia.

(2) M.Sekhar, BESTIU, India.

(3) C J Jagdeesha, Karunya University – Karunya Institute of Technology and Sciences, India.

(4) Satrio Budi Prakoso, Ehime University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.37/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Damte Balcha Gadana, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (M.Sekhar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (C J Jagdeesha, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Satrio Budi Prakoso, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effects of KNO3 Seed Priming and Fertilizer Management on Growth and Yield of Green Gram (Vigna radiata L.) in a Temperate Agro-climate

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Mohammed Jard Kadhim, Assistant Professor, Al- Furat  Al- Awsat Technical University, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Abdul Ahad Qureshi, PMAS Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi, Pakistan.

(2) Rakesh K. Singh, University of Florida, United States of America.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ch.Ramakrishna, PVNRT Veterinary University, India.

(2) Rakesh Kumar, SKUAST, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Abdul Ahad Qureshi, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rakesh K. Singh, United States of America) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of Polyploidy on Crop Improvement and Plant Breeding Strategies: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Assistant Professor, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Ravindra K N, Karnataka State Open University, India.

(2) Pankaj  Kumar Maurya, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ravindra K N, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pankaj Kumar Maurya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Distribution and Implications of Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Genotypes in Animals: A Comprehensive Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Assistant Professor, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Getahun Asebe, Gambella University, Ethiopia.

(2) Tasawar Iqbal, Institute of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Getahun Asebe, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Tasawar Iqbal, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Role of Herbivore-Induced Plant Volatiles in Tri-trophic Interactions and Pest Management

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Maria Serrano, University Miguel Hernández, Spain.

(2) Dr. Hayder Ali Mohammed Al-Keraway, University of Kerbala, Iraq.

(3) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Arup Khakhlari, Assam Don Bosco University, India.

(2) Pushan Chakraborty, Jogamaya Devi College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Arup Khakhlari, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pushan Chakraborty, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA