Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Paola Angelini, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Yuko Harada, Kawasaki Municipal Ida Hospital, Japan.

(2) Prasad Mamidi, R. B. Ayurvedic Medical College & Hospital, India.

(3) Estela Cuevas-Romero, Universidad Autónoma De Tlaxcala, México.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.03/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Yuko Harada, Japan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Prasad Mamidi, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Estela Cuevas-Romero, México) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vasudevan Mani, Associate Professor, College of Pharmacy, Qassim University, Buraidah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Reviewers:

(1) Vishal Banewar, Dr. Homi Bhabha State University, India.

(2) R. Elancheran, Annamalai University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Vishal Banewar, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (R. Elancheran, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. R. Deveswaran, Associate Professor& Head, Drug Design and Development Centre, M. S. Ramaiah University of Applied Sciences, India

Reviewers:

(1) Neeraj Shetty, Hinduhrudaysamrat Balasaheb Thackarey Medical College (HBTMC) and Dr. Rustom Narsi Cooper Municipal General Hospital, India.

(2) Deepti Dewan, Government Homoeopathic Medical College & Hospital, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Neeraj Shetty, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Deepti Dewan, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Paola Angelini, University of Perugia, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Kazuo Higa, Fukuoka University, Japan.

(2) Nazia Shuaib, Rawal Institute of Health Sciences, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Kazuo Higa, Japan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Nazia Shuaib, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Koteshwara Mudigonda, Director of Novel Drug Delivery Systems Propharmex Company, India

Reviewers:

(1) Basavaraj  J Bhagawati, Surendera Dental College and Research institute,  Rajashan University, India.

(2) Manish Anand, Meenakshi Ammal Dental College and Hospital, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Basavaraj J Bhagawati, India) | File 1 |NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Manish Anand, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Paola Angelini, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) James McKivigan, Touro University Nevada, USA.

(2) Irena Malinowska, Institute of Chemical Sciences, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University, Poland.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (James Mckivigan, USA) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Irena Malinowska, Poland) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ahmed Medhat Mohamed Al-Naggar, Professor, Cairo University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Vinod Kumar Dudhyan, Maharana Pratap Horticultural University, India.

(2) Teodora Mihova, Bulgaria.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Vinod Kumar Dudhyan, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Teodora Mihova, Bulgaria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ashish Anand, Assistance Profressor, GV Montgomery Veteran Affairs Medical Center, University of Mississippi Medical Center, and William Carey School of Osteopathic Medicine, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Muthuka John Kyalo, Kenya Medical Training College, Kenya.

(2) Rupak BK Ghimire, Kathmandu University, Nepal.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Sushmitha E S, RGUHS, India.

(2) Iman Tajer Abdullah, University of Kirkuk, Iraq.

(3) Mutaz Sabah Ahmeid, Ibnsina University of Medical and Pharmaceutical Science, Iraq.

(4) Suman Babu, Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Muthuka John Kyalo, Kenya) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Rupak BK Ghimire, Nepal) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Madogni Vianou Irenee, Universite d’Abomey-Calavi (UAC), Benin.

Reviewers:

(1) I. Afşin Kariper, Erciyes University, Turkey.

(2) Yuan-Tsung Chen, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, Taiwan.

(3) Wael Abdalla Aziz Elhelece, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Albert Kazadi Mukenga Bantu, University of Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo.

(2) Larbah Youssef, Algeria.

(3) Mirza Humaun Kabir Rubel, University of Rajshahi, Bangladesh.

(4) Spoiala Angela, University Politehnica of Bucharest, Romania.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (I. Afşin Kariper, Turkey) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Yuan-Tsung Chen, Taiwan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Wael Abdalla Aziz Elhelece, Egypt) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Marco Trevisan, Professor, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Nain Peralta Antonio, Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Mexico.

(2) Champa Lal Khatik, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mitos D. Delco, Sultan Kudarat State University, Philippines.

(2) Rakiya Abdullahi, University of Maiduguri, Nigeria.

(3) Ryan Mark A. Ambong, Occidental Mindoro State College, Philippines.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Nain Peralta Antonio, Mexico) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Champa Lal Khatik, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA